THE
r
BEAUTIES
MODERN ARCHITECTURE
ILLUSTRATED BT
FORTY-EIGHT ORIGINAL PLATES,
DESIGNED EXPRESSLY FOR THIS WORK.
BY MINARD LAFEVER, ARCHITECT.
THIRD EDITION.
N E \V - Y O R K :
D. APPLETON &CO., 200, BROADWAY.
18 3 9.
\ '
Entered, according to the Act of Congress, by
D. APPLETON & CO.
In the Cle.k's Office of the 1 istrict Court of the Southern Distiict of New-York.
H. LfDwK:, PRINT en,
7i2,Veieyst.,N V.
PREFACE
Notwithstanding tlie many works which have heretofore been pub-
lished on (he subject of Architecture, there has none yet appeared, intended
exclusively for the operative workman. It is therefore thought proper, to
present to the industrious and ingenious, a book of original designs, with
plans, elevations, sections, and technical terms associated therewith, which
will enable him to become a complete master of his business, more systema-
ticallj' than by any other plan yet adopted, and more particularly so, when
studied in connection with liis practical pursuits.
It has, on all occasions, been admitted that experience enables the genius
of man to advance and improve the subjects of his pursuits. And if such
favour these ertbrts, the patrons of former late works may, with propriety,
expect to be perfected by the perusal of this, which is the result of experience
and study, in the various departments of the science, the practice of building,
and Architecture in general.
At this era it would be an insurmountable task to enter into all the parti-
culars necessary to gratify many who may have occasion to peruse this work.
Yet it is due to the labour bestowed in designing a work which requires all
the intellectual powers possible, not to prejudice the public mind previous to
examining the whole matter " fairly and justly."
Believing those into whose hands this work may fall, to be that part of
the community that will discreetly examine, and give credit where it is due, I
with satisfaction submit to ihem the result of my labour, for their prudent
and careful examination. And after which, if their approval be the result,
it will follow that their patronage will be enlisted in behalf of The Beauties
of Modern Architecture.
MINAKD LAFEVER.
J
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
EXTRACTS FROM ELMES DICTIONARY.
At the commenceiiient of this publication, historical matter was deemed
unimportant ; but, after a more mature consideration, it is estimated as being
of utility to the practical workman, in giving him more magnified and
pleasing ideas of his profession, as well as to discover that architecture is
more than a mere mechanical art or profession, and to prove to him that the
art of design requires an exclusive and thorough study. And for the use
and iDenefit of the patrons, the following admirable historical account and de-
scription is selected :
"Architecture. [»^p^it£ktohcc. Greek; architectural Latin.] The art
or science of devising or di awing designs for buildings. The name of this
branch of the fine arts is derived from «fxo?, chief, and t£xtok«, and is
the art of building according to rules and proportions. Among all the arts,
the progeny of pleasure and necessity, which men have invented to alle-
viate the pains of life, and to transmit their names to posterity, a very high
and distinguished situation must be assigned to aichitecture, whether for
its antiquity, utility, or beauty. It is both a fine art and a science, and will
be considered as such in this dictionary ; referring to distinct treatises for
details of its mechanical and scientific parts of building and construction.
The distinguishing characteristics of a good style are, order, convenience
of interior clistribution, leauty of form, revdarity, and a good taste
in the intention, selection, or application of ornaments. Architecture is
again divisible into three branches, civil, military, and naval ; the former
of which only will be treated of in this work. The style of ci\dl archi-
tecture differs among different people, and among the same people of a dif-
ferent era. Among the people who have given names to styles in archi-
tecture, are the iJgyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Indian, Phmnician,
Hebraic or Jeunsh, Greek, Roman, E'rnscan, Moorish, Arabian, Saxon,
English, Gothic, Chinese, Saracenic, Turkish, Aud among the charao
6 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
teristics resulting from different er£E are the best ages of the antique, of the
lower empire, and modern architecture.
" Architecture is both a science and an art, and has been cultivated in
either way with great but doubtful success ; the aimer at mere science often
degenerating into a skilful artizan, and the boaster of picturesque skill into
a pictorial theorist.
"Without science, architecture is an effeminate and useless pastime;
and without the higher feelings of art, a mere constructor of huts and
cabins.
'• The scientific part of the art embraces and requires geometry, arithmetic,
and every branch of the mathematics, mechanics, chemistry, mineralogy,
ptactical philosophy in general ; which aie to be applied with judgment to
composition, construction, design, and execution.
" Tlie artist-like part of architecture soars to the sublimest heaven of
human invention. To tlie skill of the practical mathematician, mechanic,
chymist, philosopher, must be added the genius and feelings of the artist, to
go towards the composition of a Palladio or a Wren.
" Architecture, as an art, stands entirely alone and distinctive from every
other art, and is essentially the most original of them all. It is not imitative
of originality, Uke painting and sculpture, nor imitative of imitations, like
engraving ; but if it resembles either in its mechanical part, it is in its theo-
retical resemblance to music. Architecture is fundamentally original, and
shows the power of man's invention more than any art, and equally with
any science. It calls in the aid of all the other arts, uses and rejects them
by turns, and has been in every age the fosterer, protector, and promulgator
of them all.
" Architecture will, therefore, be considered both as an art and as a science
in this work, which is addressed more immediately to the amateur and
student than to the professor, and also to the inc^uiring cognoscenti and per-
sons of taste, whose prospects or situations in life may render them patrons
of the arts.
" Architecture, being the first and earliest of the arts, embraces of necessity
in itself a general Icnowledge of the critical or philosophical part of fine art
in general, which, thus forming the taste on the purest models, is best fitted to
enlarge the mind and prepare it for the reception of the laws and governing
principles of the whole circle of the fine arts. It is an art wliich has ' un-
doubtedly a dignity that no other art possesses, whether we consider it in
its rudest state, occupied in raising a hut, or as practised in a cultivated
nation, in the erection of a magnificent and .ornamented temple.'
A UCr-IITECTURAL HISTORY. 7
" A recent critic* beautifully says, that ' nothing, certainly, can be more
destructive to the hopes of an enlightened age of fame among remote pos-
terity, than the decay of an art whose monuments are so lasting, and whose
triumphs are so sure of continuance. Its venerable relics convey to us all
we know of the mighty nations long sunk into oblivion. Among piles which
seem only to have partaken of the decay and shared in the revolutions of
nature, we feel transported through long vistas of the short-lived generations
of man, into the glories of the earliest nations of the world ; we catch the
mysterious spirit of patriarchal times, and image to ourselves among these
romantic solitudes shepherd-kings propounding their pure ordinances, simple
tribes adoring the God of heaven, and untutored bards catching inspiration
in all its wildness from the skies. ' We must leave such memorials of our
glory beliind us, as can be shaken only with the pyramids of Egypt and the
pillars of the universe.' But what a contrast do the frail memorials of
our times present to those immortal structures ! and how is the art patronized
now in comparison with those of our Charleses and Annes, which produced a
Jones and a Wien, a Whitehall, a St. Paul's, and the solid churches of Lon-
don after the fire !
" ' AO who feel interested by the substantial progress of the fine arts, all
who have feelings to admire the sacred solemnity and the awful grandeur of
those venerable piles which the genius of Egypt, of Greece, of Rome, and
of the middle ages, have left us, must be deeply interested by a discussion of
the means by which that spirit maybe revived, which raised these works of
unfading enchantment, and which now seems slumbering beneath them.'
The season is most apt foV a proper awakening ; and we may indulge the
hope that both our patrons and our architects may exert themselves
with effect to give dignity and stability to our national structures.
" Architecture, considered as the art of building or construction, has three
principal characters or primary divisions, namely : civil, military, and naval.
The former, civil architecture, is the subject of the present article, and may be
subdivided into three principal classes or orders, as monumental, sacred,
and domestic.
"I. Monumental Architecture may be almost called the primitive
branch of the art, for the rude stone erected in the simplest manner is a pruni-
tive monument.
" In making a sketch of the history of architecture among the most ancient
nations of the world, we find them almost invariably alike. The primitive
* In Vaipy's new Review.
g ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
town, or incipient city, was a number of low straggling iuits, scattered about
irregularly according to the caprice of each proprietor, built with turf and
rude stones, and thatched with straw or reeds, without any light l^ut what
they received by a door so low that it could not be entered upright. The
suburban architecture of the best towns in our unhappy siste^- country, Ire-
land, is a type of the origin of the art in the most ancient times.
" Monumental architecture, in its most ancient practice, is scarcely sepa-
rated from sacred ; the monumental stone became an altai, and it is easy to
conceive the rapid progress from this rude and simple place of adoration to
the deity to the more solemn temple. First we find the single monumental
stone, reared on end, commemorative of some event, or testimonial of a treaty
or boundary of property, used also as an altar of sacrifice or offering to the
deity. This becomes surrounded by a pavement, to prevent the earth from
being sodden by the blood of the animals and the moisture from the wetofler-
ings trodden about ])y the feet of the primeval priests. The next step is to
surround the sacred precinct with a row of rude upright stones, such as are
seen at the present day in various parts of Ireland, wiiich, being covered
over to protect the sacrifices, priests, and offerings, from the sun and rain,
becomes a primeval temple with its roof, its ceU, and its altar.
"Such examples of monumental architecture have l)een found in all coun-
tries, have been consecrated to every religious creed, and are used to com-
memorate all sorts of actions ; and to this day, in Ireland, the memory of a
murder is always preser\'ed by a rude heap of stones, every passer-by con-
tributing one. These monuments, such as altar-stones, cromlechs, druidical
circles, cairns, &c., bear the genuine characters of simplicity which infant
societies and primitive rehgion impress at their origin on every thing connect-
ed with them. An able French antiquary, M. Mazois, says, ' a few stones,
either naturally rising above the soil, or placed without art in solitary spots in
the depth of forests or on the summits of hills, were the first altars.' Such
are common in every part of our island, except where the demon innovation
has swept them away. These piimitive monuments soon became sanctified
by the veneration of the people, and were received as emblems of the divinity.
Such rustic monuments are found in every country in the world. The
Arabs and other nations of the East represented their gods by rough un-
hewn stones. It was even considered as sacrilegious by the Persians to give
them the human form.
" The Greeks themselves who were so well accjuainted with the art of
embellishing every thing, originally represented their divinities under the
form of simple stones. In the time of Pausanias, there were still to be seen,
ARCHITECTURALHISTORY. 9
near Pherae, thirty blocks of stone consecrated to tlie thirty gods who were
the earliest objects of Greciaa adoration. Even Love and the Graces had at
first no other images. In the time of Titus, Venus was still at Paphos but a
simple pyramidal stone.
"Thus Greece, the country of the fine arts, presents us, even in the
epoch of her splendour, with a number of these primitive monuments.
We find that they were equally venerated by almost every other peo-
ple. The Romans, in the time of Numa, entertained the same notions
as the Persians with regard to the manner of representing the deit)\
It was by them also deemed an impiety to impart to their gods a mortal
shape ; simple boundary stones were their images, and the name of
Jupiter Terminus is a proof of the existence of that ancient usage.
Egypt was formerly covered with those sacred stones, the original type
of which is still manifest in the pyramids ; those haughty and too silent
depositories of Egyptian mythology are only — so to speak — the ennobled
descendants of primitive monuments. In short, those symbolical stones are
to be seen in the heart of Asia, as shall be hereafter shown. Kempfer
declares that at Japan, they are even yet the objects of the veneration of
the multitude.
" Among the most ancient people whose history has reached our times,
are those inhabitants of the globe who lived before the flood, and whose
deeds and occupations are recorded in the books of Bloses. The history
of architecture, considered philosophically and as connected with the other
arts of design, with science, and with legislature, is a history of the human
mind. It bears so strong an impression of the character of the people by
whom it has been cultivated, that an attentive examination of its origin
and progress is the most eflfectual way to discover the genius, and manners,
and the mental characteristics of the various nations of the world. 'Art,'
says Wieland, ' is the half of our nature ; and without art man is the
most miserable of animals.'
"Among the antediluvians, architecture could not have made much
progress as a fine art. The principal objects of these ancient heroes were
the chase and other modes of providing food and clothing without the
labour of cultivating the soil. Sanconiatho says, (apud Euseb. Prjep.
Evang. 1. i., c. 9 , p. 35.) that 'fishing was one of the earliest inventions
which the ancients attributed to their heroes.' The Bible and Homer
are full of the manners of our earliest ancestors. Fishing, hunting, the
care of their flocks, and, in later times, agriculture, were the employments
of their monarchs and heroes, their shepherd-kings. Cookery, washing,
2
10 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
making garments, and other domestic business, were those of their women
of rank, their princesses, and their queens.
"The history of architecture before the flood, although it forms a
large portion in the history of the art by a French author, (Milan,) fur-
nishes but few authentic facts. The great historian and legislator of the
Jews, Moses, has only related those leading events which were neces-
sary to his history, and omitted those details which are only requisite for the
gratification of curiosity.
" Our great philosopher, Sir William Jones, in discoursing of this great
event, the deluge, says, ' the sketch of antediluvian history, as given by
most ancient historians of the race of Adam, in which we find many dark
passages, is followed by the narrative of a deluge which destroyed the whole
race of man except four pairs ; an historical fact, admitted as true by every
nation to whose literature we have access, and particularly by the ancient
Hindus, who have allotted a whole piirnna to the detail of that event,
which they relate as usual in symbols or allegories. I concur most hearti-
ly, says this learned philosopher, ' with those who insist that in proportion
as any fact mentioned in history seems repugnant to the course of nature,
or, in one word, miraculous, the stronger evidence is required to induce a
rational belief of it ; but we hear that cities have been overwhelmed
by eruptions from burning mountains, territories laid waste by hurri-
canes, and whole islands depopulated by earthquakes : if then we look
at the firmament sprinkled with innumerable stars, we conclude by a fair
analogy that every star is a sun, attracting like ours a system of inhabited
planets ; and if our ardent fancy, soaring hand in hand with sound rea-
son, waft us beyond our visible diurnal sphere into regions of immensity,
disclosing other celestial expanses, and other systems of suns and worlds on
all sides without number or end, we cannot but consider the submersion of
our little spheroid as an infinitely less event in respect of the immeasura-
ble universe, than the destruction of a city or an isle, in respect of this
habitable globe. Let a general flood, however, be supposed improbable,
in proportion to the magnitude of so ruinous an event, yet the concur-
rent evidences of it are completely adequate to the supposed improba-
bility.'
" The state of mankind immediately after this general deluge, is shown
in the Mosaic history. The families of Noah which emerged from the ark,
after paying their grateful adoration to the Deity who had preserved them,
in order to perpetuate their race, erected an altar of unhewn stones, and
offered sacrifice thereon. This is one of the most ancient examples of post-
diluvian monumental architecture on record.
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 11
" The descendants of Noah remained no longer united in one society
than was necessary for their increase and security. As soon as they
were sufficiently numerous, they dispersed themselves into the different re-
gions of the earth, about a century and a half after the flood. It does
not, however, appear that it was their intention at first to separate perma-
nently, though they were often obliged to separate in search of subsistence.
' With this view they formed the design of building a city, and of raising
a tower of a great height in the centre of it, as a signal and as a point of
union.' It was for this purpose that the French antiquary, De Goguet,
in his Origine dcs Loii; attributes the erection of that vast structure,
called the tower of Babel ; wliile the best translators of the Hebrew Bible
render the fourth verse of the eleventh chapter of Genesis, 'let us build
us a city and a tower whose top may reach unto heaven ; and let us make
us a name, lest we be scattered abroad ;' giving the desire of perpetuat-
ing their fame by an indestructible monument, as their motive for this
undertaking.
'= We learn the simple manners and customs of the ancient Israelites
and the nations in their immediate vicinity, from their ancient writers.
And Homer, in describing the manners of the Cyclops, gives a cor-
roborating idea of the uncultivated state of many of the ancient nations.
' The Cyclops,' says the poet," ' know no laws ; each governs his family,
and rules over his wife and children. They trouble not themselves
with the affairs of their neighbours, and think not themselves inter-
ested in them. According!}^, they have no assemblies to deliberate on
public afiairs. They are governed by no general laws to regulate
their manners and their actions. They neither plant nor sow. They
are fed by ihe fruit which the earth produces spontaneously. Their
abode is on the summits of mountains, and caverns serve them for
retreats.
" This unsocial, uncultivated mode of living could not be of long con-
tinuance with regard to a great part of mankind. So many motives
must have concurred to induce families to associate and mingle with each
other, that several must have united early.
" The connexion of architecture and the rest of the arts and sciences,
with the laws, government, and manners of a people, are curious and use-
ful subjects of inquiry. Their relation with the history of the human
mind is clear and indisputable.
" Architecture takes its style, its varieties, its colouring, if it may be so
* Odyssey, 1, ix., v. 106. et seq.
J2 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
called, from the people who successively invented or introduced it ; and
their moral characters as a people may be deduced from their national styles
of architecture, as will be hereafter shown.
" Among the earliest specimens of monumental architecture of which
we read, Josephus acquaints us that the children of Seth erected two pil-
lars, one of brick and the other stone, on which they engraved the princi-
ples of astronomy. The making of bricks, the building with hewn
stone, and the art of sculpture here shown, are proofs of a high degree of
civilization and a knowledge of the arts and sciences by no means con-
temptible.
" In the second age of the world, which is calculated from the building
of the tower of Babel by the posterity of Noah to the foundation of Athens
by Cecrops in the year before Christ 155(5, many large cities were founded.
Early in this period, Nimrod laid the foundation of the Assyrian empire,
and buUt Ninevah, the celebrated metropolis of Assyria. Nearly at the
same time Troy was founded by Scamander ; Mizraim, the son of Ham, led a
colony into Egypt, and laid the foundation of a kingdom ; and Cadmus,
the reputed inventor of letters, with Moses, the Jewish legislator, and Aaron,
his brother, flourished.
" In this early period of history, the Assyrians cultivated the arts, and
excelled in that of architecture. This second epoch, or age, is distinguish-
ed by the building of the tower of Babel, and by the design formed by the
posterity of Noah, and in part executed, of building a city in the plains of
Shinai.* According to some historians, Belus, known in the Scriptures by
the name of Nimrod, the first king of Assyria, was the reputed projector
of this structure. He built, afterwards, in the same place, the celebrated
city of Babylon, where he arrogated to himself the honours of divinity. Ni-
nus, his son, erected to him the first known temple, consecrated a statue to his
memory, and ordered it to be worshipped, which is the first recorded instance
of idolatry.
" Babylon was a large and beautiful city. Pliny relates (lib. vi., c. 26.)
that it was sixty miles in circumference, that its walls were two hundred
feet high and fifty thick, and that the magnificent temple of Jupiter Belus
was standing there in his time. Herodotus says it was four hundred
and eighty furlongs in circumference ; that it w^as full of magnificent
structures, and celeljrated for the temple of Belus ; that it had a hun-
dred gates of brass, which proves that the fusion and mixture of metals
were known ; and that other arts dependent on design were then prac-
tised.
* Qeoesii, xi. 4.
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 13
" 111 less than two centuries after the flood, architecture was cultivated
in Chaldea, China, Egypt, and Pha?nicia. Moses* has preserved the names
of several cities which Nimrod built in Chaldea. The Chinese, say the
Fohi, enclosed cities and towns with walls, (Martini, 1. i., p. 28 ;) and
Semiraniis, the wife of Ninus, finished the stupendous walls of Babylon,
W'hich were reckoned among the seven wonders of the world, and her
palace, which is celebrated by historians for the historical and emblema-
tical sculptures with which the walls were covered, and for the colossal
statues of bronze and gold of Jupiter Belus, Kinus, Semiramis, and of her
principal warriors and officers of state.
" Architecture, having thus been successfully practised among the Assy-
rians, was carried by them into Egypt, the most ancient country of which
we have any autlientic monuments existing, and also into other countries,
the people of which they subjugated. The Egyptian style of architecture
is characterized by a solidity of construction, by an originality of conception,
and by a boldness of form. Tlie civilization of this people and the conse-
quent cultivation of the arts, commenced in Upper Egypt. The architectu-
ral monuments of this portion of Egypt are more numerous, more character-
istic, and more ancient, than those of Lower Egypt, whose inhabitants for a
long period after the knowledge of architecture in Upper Egypt lived in
natural caves and excavations in the mountains. The excavations nov/
remaining and mentioned by travellers, are possibly of this period; but the
hieroglyphics and otiier figures with which they are sculptured are of a
later period than that of their first reputed inhabitants.
"Before entering on the details of the Egyptian monuments, I will first
briefly analyze and describe the character of their architecture. The char-
acteristics or elementary principles of Egyptian architecture are, walls of
great thickness, roofs generally of a single block of stone which reached
from wall to wall, a multitude of columns of various forms, proportions, and
ornaments, seldom with bases, and when with that addition they are mostly
simple plinths. The capitals vary considerably, as may be seen in the
works of Denon, Dr. Pococke, Belzoni, and other travellers. In some in-
stances they are ornamented witii foliage, in others they resemble a vase,
and again in others a bell reversed. In Egyptian architecture there is no
frieze, nor, correctly speaking, any cornice or architrave, and their substitutes
may be called by either name ; for something resembling them may be
traced in the epistylia, or beams of stone, which reach from column to
column.
• Genesis, x. 10.
14 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
"Another characteristic of Egyptian arcliitecture is a peculiar narrowness
of intercolumniaiion, being often not more than three feet and a half in
width. The absence of arches, whicli are supphed by epistyha, or stone
beams, or hntels, is also another and peculiar characteristic of this original
and singular style.
" Dr. Pococke thinks that the ancient Egyptians were not ignorant of the
construction of the arch, but does not give satisfactory proofs of the cause
of his conviction. And the president De Goguet, in his learned disserta-
tion on the origin of laws, arts, and sciences, assumes from their not using
it, that they did not understand it. The proofs which he gives of this igno-
rance might with as great propriety be adduced of their contempt of this
mechanical means of covering apertures. Tlie nearest approach to the
principle is to be seen in the entrance of the great pyramid at Memphis, of
which an engraving is given in that work.
"Belzoni agrees in opinion of their knowledge of the arch, and found
specimens at Thebes and at Gournon, under the rocks which separate that
place from tiie valley Babel el Malook.
" However conjectural the origin of the Egyptian style may be, thus far
at least is certain, that it is the fountain whence all succeeding people
have drawn their most copious draughts, and is deserving of minute investi-
gation. Tliis style bears all the marks of freshness of invention drawn
from native materials and national symbols. It is in the country of its
origin that those colossal wonders, those arcliitectural monsters, the pyramids,
are situated. It is needless to dwell upon a long description of these struc-
tures. They have been the theme of literati and travellers for centuries, and
bear authentic testimony to the truth of history.
" The largest of the three pyramids said to have been built by Cheops,
or Chemnis, forms a square whose base is six hundred feet and its height
nearly five hundred feet, or an area the size of Lincoln's Inn Fields, which
have been said to have been constructed of this specific size by Inigo Jones
for the purpose of illustration, and its apex nearly a third higher than the
summit of the cross of St. Paul's.
" This mountain of masonry is constructed with stones of an extraordinary
size, many of them being thirty feet long, four in height, and three in
thickness. Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, and Pliny, say, that the stones
employed in building the pyramids were brought from Ethiopia and Arabia.
This fact De Goguet affects to doubt, for he says it is not likely that the
kings of Egypt, having excellent materials at hand, would have unnecessa-
rily expended immense sums to have fetched them from afar. And that
the stones of the pyramids bear too great a resemblance to those which are
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 15
found in tlie neighbourhood, for him to imagine that they were not taken
thence. Yet it is no less probable that the stones referred to by these
ancient historians, may have been the marble with which they were coated,
and may have been fetched from the neighbourhood of the Red Sea and
from Upper Egypt.
" The origin of the pyramids, the causes of their erection, and by whom,
are diflerenlly related ; but Belzoni has in some measure set the question at
rest by his recent discoveries, and proved that they were the tombs of their
founders.
" Herodotus, the father of pagan history, records with an interesting accu-
racy the methods used in constructing the greater pyramid, that leaves
nothing to doubt. He relates that a hundred thousand workmen were em-
ployed at the same time in the construction of this pyramid. They were
relieved by an equal number every three months. Ten years, he reports,
on the authority of the Egyptian priests, were employed in hewing and
conveying the stones, and twenty more in finishing this enormous structure,
which contained galleries, chambers, and a well.
" An eminent writer in the Asiatic Researches (Captain Wilford,) in a
very curious dissertation on this subject, translated from the ancient books
of the Hindus, says, the pyramids are there called three stupendous moun-
tains, of gold, silver, and of precious stones. They might be so named in
the hyperbolical style of the eastern nations, but he conjectured they were
so used from the coating with which they were covered, and that the first
was said to be of gold, because it was covered with yellow marble; the
second of silvei; being coated with while marble; and the third of jewels
and precious stones, because it excelled the others in magnificence, being
coated with beautiful variegated marbles of a fine grain and exquisite
lustre.
" If these pyramids were entirely faced with marble and ornamented by
sculpture, if these tremendous masses of eternal masonry were but cores
to ornamental structures, such as have been described, they may, nay, they
must have been, particularly, if their summits were surmounted by the sky-
piercing obelisk, the grandest architectural monuments ever produced by the
little builder, man.
" Near to these pyramids is the colossal head called the Sphinx of
Ghiza, the face of which resembles a woman, and the body that of a lion.
This extraordinary figure is said to have been the sepulchre of the Egyp-
tian king Amasis, and is one entire stone, being sculptured out of a solid
rock.
" Count Cabillia, who investigated this spot a short time previous to the
Ig ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
enterprizing Belzoni, succeeded, after much labour and difficulty, in uncov-
ering the front of this colossus, and found a small temple between its front
paws, and a large tablet of granite on its breast inscribed with figures and
hieroglyphics.
"Among other celebrated examples of monumental architecture among the
Egyptians, are their obelisks, which have been considered not only purely
Egyptian in use, but also in origin. But if what Herodotus says be true,
it must have been in Asia, and not in Egypt, that they had their origin.
" This ancient author speaks of a pyramidal spire erected by command
of Semiramis on the road to Babylon, which was a single stone, one hun-
dred and thirty feet in height, and twenty-five broad at its base. Pliny,
however, insists on their Egyptian origin, and that a king of Heliopolis,
called Mestres, was the first who caused one to be raised. Be this as it may,
the monarchs and people of Egypt appear always to have had a great taste
for obelisks, and the names of those who erected such may be found in the
works of the elder Pliny.
"Two of the principal of tliese grand monuments of art were erected by
Sesostris, with the design of informing posterity of the extent of his power and
the number of the nations which he had conquered. They are each of a
single piece of granite one hundred and eighty feet high.
" Augustus, according to Pliny, transported one of these obelisks to Rome,
and raised it in the Campus Martins. Of the three now in Rome, doubts
have been raised whether either of them are of those raised by Sesostris, on
account of their want of heiglit. That now by the fountain of the Piazzo
del Popolo, is seventy-four feet without its modern pedestal ; that of the
Vatican, in front of St. Peter's, seventy-eight feet ; and that on Triiiita de
Monte, forty-five feet without their pedestals ; while those of Sesostris were
of the enormous height of one hundred and eighty feet.
" The oljelisk of the Piazza del Popolo is that which was brought to
Rome by Augustus, after being spared from the ravages of Cambyses, from
respect to its origin, wiien that furious conqueror put all to fire and sword in
Egypt, sparing neither palaces nor temples, nor those superb monuments
which, ruined as they are, are still the admiration of travellers.
" From the place where it was originally elevated by Augustus, it was
removed to its present situation by Pope Sextus V., in 1589, under the direc-
tion of the Cavalier Fontana, who also designed its pedestal and the conti-
guous fountain. The one now so great an ornament in the front of St.
Peter's, is also said to have been one of those erected by Sesostris at Heliopo-
lis, the city of the sun, and was brought to Rome, by Caligula, in a vessel
then the largest that had ever been seen at sea, and was afterwards sunk
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 17
to fonii the port of Ostia. Caligula erected it in liis circus at the Vatican,
which was destroyed by Constantine the Great, to build the first basilica of
St. Peter; but he left the obelisk standing on the spot now occupied by the
sacristy. It was removed at an expense of nearly £10,000 sterling, in 1586,
by Sextus V. to its present situation, nearly a century before the construction
of the fine colonnade which now surrounds it.
"Of the great and beautiful temple of Dendera, or Tentyra, it is difficult
to say whether it be monumental or sacred, but it may class with the former.
The inhabitants of this place were great worshippers of Isis and Venus.
From the ruins, it appears that the temples of this city were more beautiful
and splendid and in a better style of art and workmanship than any other
now remaining in Egypt. Dr. Pococke, Captain Norden, Paul Lucas,
Granger, Maillett, Cassas, and Denon, have been diffuse and enthusiastic
in their descriptions of Tentyra. Denon was so enraptured when he stood
beneath the portico of the great temple at Tentyra, that he exclaimed, 'I
thought myself, nay, I really was, in the sanctuary of I he arts and sciences.
I was agitated by the multiplicitj' of objects, amazed by their novelty, and
tormented by the fear that I should never behold them again.' The extent
of this temple was such, that the Arabs had formerly a village on its roof,
the ruins of which are still to be seen.
" Belzoni, in his travels in Egypt, speaking of this temple, says, ' on the
19th, early in the morning, my curiosity w'as at a high pitch, the noted
temple of Tentyra being the only thougbt I had in my head. On arriving
before it, I was for some time at a loss where I should begin my examina-
tion. The numerous objects before me, all e(jUally attractive, left me for a
while in a state of suspense and astonishment.' The enormous masses of
stone employed in the edifice are so well disposed, that the eye discovers the
most just proportion everj'where. The majestic appear ince of its construc-
tion, the variety of its ornaments, and, above all, the singularity of its pre-
servation, had such an effect on Belzoni, that he seated himself on the
ground, and was for a considerable time lost in admiration. It is the first
Egyptian temple the traveller sees on ascending the Nile, and is certainly
the most magnificent. It has an advantage over most others, from the good
state of preservation it is in. It is the cabinet of Egyptian art, the product
of study for many centuries, and deserves all the praise that has been given
to it. It was in this grand monument of tbe art that t'le celebrated Zodiac
of Tentyra was found, which MM. Saulnier and Leloraine have recently
carried away to Paris.
" There are few subjects on which men of learning and taste have differed
more than upon the art of the Egyptians. Some raising it to the skies,
3
IQ ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
others scouting it as the barbarous of barbarism. De Goguet and his follow-
ers treated it with the utmost contempt. Denon and Belzoni overflow with
praises of its beauties, and find no defects. Sonnini describes his sensations
at the sight of their temples as difficult to define, so grand, so majestic did
he find them. It was not a simple admiration merely, but an ecstasy which
suspended the use of all his faculties. He remained for some time immovable
■with rapture, and felt himself more than once inclined to prostrate himself
in token of veneration before monuments, the rearing which appeared to
transcend the strength and genius of man.
"Yet after all, the Egyptian style is monotonous, sombre, heavy, and
unfit for our use ; and, if studied exclusively, till regard for antiquity engen-
ders love for ugliness, is destructive of a pure taste. What made probably a
delightful parlour in Egypt, would make an excellent coal cellar in England.
Yet, from its antiquity and excellence of construction, there are few styles
more interesting to the antiquary, more delightful to the traveller, or bearing
greater testimony to the truth of ancient history.
"Although the lively Frenchman, Sonnini, says, that before it the so
much boasted fabrics of Greece and Rome must come and bow down ; yet,
when it is calmly investigated and brought to the standard of judgment, it
will not bear a momentary comparison with either for chasteness, real beauty,
and true sublimity.
" Architecture among the ancient Jews, is a much darker and more inex-
plicable subject. The Hebrews, Israelites, or Jews, by a residence in Egypt
of nearly four hundred years, had attained a considerable degree of civiliza-
tion. After their deliverance from captivity in that country, they led a wan-
dering life for forty years. The temples which they had seen in Egypt
dedicated to Egyptian idols, led them to consecrate a temple where they
might assemble in public worship of the true God. As it was necessary,
from their mode of hfe during their sojournment in the wilderness, that it
should be portable, they constructed it in the form of a spacious tent. In the
plan and arrangement of this temporary erection, known by the name of the
tabernacle, they took the form, it has been conjectured, of the Egyptian tem-
ples for their guide ; ihey adopted in the details and ornaments a peculiar
and national style. Conjecture and written description is all that is left us
of the architecture of the Hebrews.
" The architectural ruins of the monuments of the old inhabitants of that
great empire improperly called by Europeans Persia — the name of a single
province being applied to the whole empire of Iran, as it is correctly deno-
minated by the natives and by the learned Mussulmans who resided in
British India — are conclusive proofs of the grandeur of this ancient people.
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 19
Tliey differ in style both from the Egyptian and the Hindu, yet possess
a general affinity. Sir William Jones, after due investigation, — and who
was ever a more ardent and laborious investigator than he? — concludes,
from the most unexceptionable evidence, that the Iranian or Persian mon-
archy must have been the most ancient in the world ; but he was doubtful
to which of the three stocks, Hindu, Arabian, or Tartarian, the first kings
of Iran belonged. He also, after a most learned and interesting disquisition,
h'jlds this proposition firmly established : that Iran, or Persia, was the true
centre of population, of knowledge, of languages, and of arls. Of such a
people, an account of their architecture cannot but be of consequence ; and
it is therefore lamentable that so few faithful delineations of their monuments
have been taken.
"The ruins of Persepolis are the principal existing remains of Persian
architecture. This city was taken by Alexander, misnamed the Great, who
was persuaded by Thais, a shameless courtesan, during a drunken revel, to
set it on fire, at the place now called by the natives Kilmanac or Ischilma-
nar, the forty columns, from the circumstance of there having been that
number standing when the Mahometans invaded that part of Iran ; but at
present there are not above nineteen left. The splendid edifice of which
these ruins are the remains, is supposed to have been erected by their king
Huished, or Schemscheddin.
" The style of the architecture and sculpture proves their antiquity. From
the fact of every column being surmounted by a figure of some animal, and
the well known circumstance of the ancient Persians performing their reli-
gious duties in the open air, proves, in opposition to Millin, — for the building
could never have had architraves or a roof, — that it was a temple. These
singular columnar ruins are formed of a beautiful white marble, which is
found in the mountain Rachmed near the spot.
'•Count Caylus thought he perceived, and endeavoured to draw, an ana-
logy between the Persepolitan and the Egyptian styles ; but we have not
sufllcient authority of the former to examine these claims.
" The Hindu style of architecture, as exemplified in their monuments,
appears to have been drawn from their original dwellings, caves and exca-
vations. Man is by nature a burrowing animal, and mostly carries his
original propensities into states of refinement.
" The period of authentic iiistory in India, as in other countries, is com-
paratively of recent date. It is scarcely more than three thousand years
since the most ancient and only genuine historical records of the ancient
world, ascribed to Musah, or, as we call him after the Greeks and Romans,
Moses, were composed. Herodotus, the most ancient heathen historian whose
20 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
works have reached our times, flourished a tliousand years later ; and Homer,
the third ancient autlior who speaks of our art, is of too doubtful a period
to establish dates.
" The remains of architectural monuments in India, from style and con-
struction, seem to prove an early connexion between that country and
Egypt. The pyramids, the colossal statues, the obelisks, the sphinx, the
mummy pits and subterranean temples with colossal figures, and the lion-
headed sphinxes, recently discovered by Belzoni in Egypt, indicate the style
and system of mythology to be akin to those of the indefatigable workmen
who formed the vast excavations of Ganarah, Elephanta, and EUora, as
well as the various immense pagodas, pillars, and colossal images of Buddha
and other Indian idols. These subjects will be farther discussed in the
article Sacred Architecture.
"Another proof of a similarity of style between the ancient Egyptians
and Hindus, is their mutually using lofty spires, or obelisks, like the pillar
of Allahabad ; a striking resemlDlance to which is seen in the ancient round
towers of Ireland ; and also between the pyramids of Egypt and the colossal
brick building in the Hadjipore district, near the Gunduc river. This im-
mense pile of brick is about two days journey up the Gunduc, one of the
tributary streams of the Ganges near Kessereah.
" Mr. Burrows, who visited it about the year 1785, and took its diinen-
sions, conceives it to be evidently intended for the well known image of the
god Maha Deo; having originally been a cylinder placed upon the frustrum
of a cone, for the purpose of being seen at a distance. It is at present very
much decayed, and it is not very easy to tell whether the upper part of the
cylinder has been circular or conical. A considerable quantity of the outside
has fallen down, but it is still seen at a great distance up and down the
river.
"The dimensions of this colossal edifice, as given by Mr. Burrows, in the
Asiatic Researches, are the diameter of the column at the base, three hun-
dred and sixty-three feet; height of the conic frustrum on which the cylin-
der is placed, ninety-three feet ; diameter of the cylinder, sixty-four feet,
which is nearly two-thirds of the size of the diameter of the base of the
cupola of St. Pauls cathedral; height of the present remains of the cylinder
or round tower, sixty-five feet ; entire height, one hiuidred and fifty-eight
feet, or nearly the height of the monument near London Bridge without its
pedestal. Both the cylinder and the cone are constructed of well burnt
bricks, many of them two spans long and one broad, and others of the com-
mon size but thinner.
" The pillar of Allahabad, as described by the late Captain Hoare, is a
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 21
lofty conical structure, coveretl with inscriptions, which are given in the
second volume of tiie Transactions of the Asiatic Society, with an engraving
of its elevation ; but neither Captain Hoarc, Mr. Colebrooke, nor Moonshee
Mohamnied Morad, who accompanied the Captain to Allahabad, could
obtain any information respecting it.
"Architecture is of too much importance in the affairs of nations lobe
neglected or despised by the political economist; being the art by which we
can best distinguisii man in a civihzed state from that of simple barbarity,
and forms a scale of comparative cultivation and of the progress of intellect
between nation and nation.
" Plato acknowledges that the science of politics and legislation began
with the building of cities, (Plat, de Leg., 1. 3. et 6.): thus has architecture
its political use, public buildings being the most distinguished and most
durable ornaments of a country. It establishes a nation, draws people,
creates commerce, makes tlie people love and respect their native country,
which passion is the origin of all great actions in a commonwealth. 'The
emulation of the cities of Greece,' says Wren, 'was the true cause of their
greatness ; the obstinate valour of the Jews, occasioned l^y the love of their
magnificent temple, was a cement that held together that people for many
ages, through infinite changes.'
" Tlie care of public decency and convenience, was a great cause of the
establishment of the Low Coitntries, and of many cities in the world. Modern
Rome subsists still by the ruins and imitation of its glorious ancestor ; as
does Jerusalem by the temple of the sepulchre and other remains of Helena's
zeal.
" Architecture aims at eternity ; and is, therefore, the only art incapable
of modes and fashions in its principles, the orders. It is also the most faith-
ful recorder of the great and noble deeds of nations long since past away;
and its works are speaking witnesses of the truth of histor}^
"By the gigantic pyramids, by the lofty obelisks, by the stupendous tem-
ples, and other architectural monuments of Egypt, we have authentic docu-
ments and ocular demonstration of the veracity of the historic pen which re-
cords the numbers and the power of tlie mighty people that once inhabited
the extensive shores of the prolific Nile.
" The Parthenon, the Erectheum, and the other brilliant gems of Attic
taste which embellish the solitary wastes of ancient Athens, bear similar
testimony to tiiat refined taste which the ancient historians and critics of an-
tiquity attribute to the people of Greece. The Acropolis and its lovely struc-
tures vouch for Pausanias; the Pyramids and obelisks of Egypt, for the
22 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
venerable father of pagan history, Herodotus ; and Rome, the eternal city,
owes its most lasting celebrity to architecture.
"By arcliitecturc, too, we are informed how painting and how sculpture
flourished among the ancients. For it has not only preserved upon its walls,
as in the temple of Tentyra, in the magnificent baths of the Roman emperors,
and on the walls of Herculaneum and Pompeii, positive vestiges of their
pencils ; but by ratifying, as it were, the truth of the historians' account of
their architecture, gives us a point whereon we may fix our belief in their de-
scriptions of the powers of their ancient painters. Thus the existing works of
Phidias, Ictinus, Cuilicrates, and Mnesicles, prove the reaUty and the power
of the highly and justly lauded productions of Zeuxis, Parrhasius, and
Apelles, of which we have only vrritten testimony.
" Much may be said of the political utility and moral advantages of a cul-
tivation of architecture ; but a few words on an enlightened patronage of it
may not be deemed extraneous from the subject.
" This proper and judicious mode of administering patronage, or in other
words, justice, to a national art, of necessity includes a patronage of all the
arts, and embellishes the names of monarchs and princes with unfading lustre,
equal to any and superior to most. A great and good prince is rendered yet
more illustrious by such encouragement ; and the infamy of a bad one is
even gilded over to his contemporaries, and overpowered to posterity, by the
brilliancy of its lustre. The bloody and drunken insanities of Alexander,
by some called the Great, are shaded by his patronage and love of art ; and
the nameless atrocities of Hadrian are softened by his deeds in art almost to
a name of repute ; while the mild lustre of a Titus receives a brilliant ac-
cession from the same causes. So is the tyranny of Pericles adorned and
neutralized by his enlightened patronage of Phidias. The Parthenon has
remitted his sins ; and Hadiianopolis, with its tasteful structures, sheds rays
of glory round the liead of the otherwise contemptible and infamous patron
and associate of Antinous.
" This art was held in such esteem by the Greeks that none but the well
born were allowed to study it, and princes gloried in its practice. If, as Sir
Joshua Reynolds asserts, the value and rank of every art be in proportion to
the mental labour employed in it, then should architecture rank very high.
As this principle is observed or neglected, architecture becomes either a libe-
ral art or a mechanical trade. In the hands of one man it makes the high-
est pretensions, as it is addressed to the noblest faculties, and becomes a mat-
ter of philosophy ; while in those of another it is reduced to a mere matter
of ornament, and the architect has but the humble province of building ele-
gant trifles.
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 23
" In a preceding section an assertion was made that architecture was a
less imitative art than either painting, sculpture or engraving ; that its ele-
ments are more purely original than those of the other arls ; yet it is in a
certain degree imitative of its own original types or prefigurations, wiiicli are
first the cavern, as exemplified in the Egyptian and the Indian styles,
which has been imitated also in our ancient British architecture, as may be
seen in many examples, such as the ancient crypt of St. Peter's, Oxford, at
Lastingham Priory, &c., where the resemblance is abundantly striking ; the
tent, as in the Chinese, and its species ; and the cabin, or wooden hut, as
displayed in tlie Greek and its imitators : that is to say, tliat the Egyptians,
the Indians, and their like, imitated in their buildings their ancient excava-
tions, their primeval dwellings ; that the Chinese, in their pagodas and other
public buildings, imitated their tent ; that tlie Greeks imitated and refined
carpentry in their marble temples; that tlie Romans followed the Greeks;
that the early architects of Britain followed the Romans ; that many archi-
tects of the present day follow the Greeks to a servile pedantry ; and that the
architects erroneously called Gothic imitated their primitive places of worship,
their sacred groves.
" Our great architect, Sir Christopher Wren, whose merits as a writer are
scarcely sufficiently acknowledged, carries this hypothesis still farther, and in a
most beautiful manner. He says, ' Vitruvius hath led us the true way to find
out the originals of the orders. When men first cohabited in civil commerce,
there was a necessity of forums and public places of meeting. In cold coun-
tries, people were obliged to shut out the air, the cold, and tlie rain ; but in
the hot countries, where civihty first began, they desired to exclude the sun
only, and admit all possible air for coolness and health. This brought in
naturally the use of porticoes, or roofs for shade, set upon columns. A walk
of trees is more beautiful than the most artificial portico ; but these not being
easily preserved in market-places, they made the more durable shades of por-
ticoes, in which we see they imitated nature. Most trees that are in their
prime, that are not saplings or dotards, observe near the proportion of Doric
columns in' the length of their boll before they part into branches. This I
think a more natural comparison than that to the body of a man, in which
there is little resemblance of a cylindrical body. The first columns were the
very bolls of trees turned or cut in prisms of many sides. A litlle curiosity
would induce to lay the torus at the top : and the conjecture is not amiss, to
say it was first a band of iron to keep the clefts occasioned by the sun from
opening with the weight above ; and to keep the weather from piercing these
clefts, it was necessary to cover it with the plinth, or square board ; and the
24 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
architrave conjoined all the columns in length,' as may be seen in the draw-
ing of the flank of the Grecian temple.
" Of these primitive styles, that of the Egyptian, or cavern style, is dark,
heavy and monotonous; the Chinese, or tent style, light, feeble, and fragile;
and the Greek, or cabin style, is at once solid and light, is susceptible of be-
ing made more or less solid or light, according to necessity or required
character, is the highest in its combinations, and that which unites in itself
in the highest degree the advantages of solidity and an infinite agreeableness
of variety. Of the elements of the cabin, or Greek style, the elegant critic
Algarolti says, in his Sac^gis sopra V Architettura, that it is the material
the most capable of furnishing the art with the greatest number of profiles,
modifications, and varied ornaments, which said profiles, modifications, and
varied ornaments, so highly prized by the Iialian critic, the Greeks have in-
duratedj sublimed, and immorialized ; while the Romans have debased
them, and, in many instances, lowered them below even their original
types.
'■ While upon the subject of that imitation which is essential to a pure
style in architecture, an imitation by no means destructive of legitimate in-
vention, a few words may be allowed by way of elucidation.
" By imitalion is not meant that servile counterfeiting of an original
which is so much the practice of some of our modern Greeks, who copy the
very fractions, of lines and profiles, instead of composing in the same spirit,
but that bold pursuit of a sublime original by parallel images and examples,
sometimes more refined, but never below their type, which distinguishes true
genius, cultivated and improved by practice and study, from the common
herd of lineal copyists' modules of minutes and of lines. Such a free imita-
tion as the iEneid is of the Iliad ; such a bold and original imitation as Mil-
ton is of Homer and of Virgil ; such imitations in short as bear the marks of
real genius—' that quality without which judgment is cold, and knowledge is
inert — that energy which collects, combines, amplifies, and animates.'
" There are two waj's by which a people can imitate the style of architec-
ture of another country ; the one true, and the otiier false. The true mode
is less an imitation than an adoption, and consists in receiving as an alpha-
bet in their entire shape the system, the rules, and the taste of a style of archi-
tecture. It was thus that the Romans adopted' the architecture of the Greeks,
or perhaps I should say of the Etrusians, which was incontestably the same.
It was thus also with the nations of modern Europe, who, abandoning the
Gothic and the incongruities of the middle ages, have appropriated the Greek
and Roman styles by legitimate adoption.
" It was after this true mode that Palladio, in his imitations and inventive
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 25
restorations of Roman magnificence, has founded a legitimate school. It was
thus that Micliel Angiolo fairly imitated the Pantheon of Agrippa in his tre-
mendous cupola of the Vatican. And it was thus that our illustrious coun-
tryman Wren, whose transcendent talents I have recently endeavoured to dis-
play to the public, rivalled in design, and surpassed in purity of taste and
scientific construction, the Basilica of St. Peter's at Rome, the work of more
than twenty architects, supported by the treasure of the Christian world, and
by the protection and under the reigns of twenty successive popes ; in his un-
rivalled and splendid work of St. Paul's, London, that glorious, though un-
finished monument of the piety and magnificence of our ancestors.
" Such imitations are far from plagiarisms, being, on the contrary, skilful
adoptions or adapiations, bearing proofs of legitimate and inventive talents.
' Genius,' says Reynolds, ' at least what is generally so called, is the child of
imitation ; it is in vain to endeavour to invent without materials on which
the mind may work, and from which invention must originate. Nothing
can come of nothing.' (Disc, i.)
" The other or false mode of imitation is plain plagiarism, and nothing
better than downright theft, without even that ingenuity to conceal the
theft, which, among the Lacedaemonians, always procured pardon for the
thief This mode consists, as it were, in importing by wholesale such por-
tions of a foreign or ancient style as appears suited to the purposes of its
importers, and converting them to their own use, not as their original inven-
tors would have done in their time and place, but forcibly torturing ancient
art to modern uses ; like as the gipsies are said to do when they steal children,
to disfigure them that they may not be known. These are mean copiers
and importers of architecture, common borrowers ; the others, liberal adopt-
ers of the great works of the great masters of our art, from whom ' the
modern arts were revived, and by whose means they must be restored a
second time.' ' However it may mortify our vanity,' said Reynolds, ' we
must be forced to allow them to be our masters ; and we may venture to
prophesy, that when they cease to be studied, arts will no longer flourish,
and we shall again relapse into barbari.?m.' (Disc, vi.)
" It was not in this way that the Greeks borrowed the idea of the Corin-
thian capital from the Egyptians. They boldly adapted and naturalized it,
as well as other types of their orders, which may be seen by comparing
them ; and concealed it with Spartan skill, gratifying their national vanity in
giving currency to the poetical hypothesis of Calliniachus and the votive
vase. The primitive types of the two capitals are the same, as may be seen
by comparison ; the original of each is a vase surrounded by foliage and
covered by an abacus, and a verbal description of the two would very nearly
4
26 ARC HITECTURAL HISTORY.
assimilate. The otlier oideis, namely, the Doric and the Ionic, are as evi-
dently drawn from the same sources : yet in the essentials of a national
style they widely differ. The Egyptians properly used the plants and
flowers of Egypt, and the Greeks those of Greece.
" If, however, the architecture of Greece be, as is often and perhaps truly
asserted, borrowed, adopted, or stolen from that of the Egyptians, the Greeks
have certainly most gorgeously embellished their robbery ; and if from their
own primeval huts and cabins, the metamorphosis of the cabin into the
temple is as rapid and complete as that of the cottage of Baucis and Phile-
mon, in the Metamorphoses of Ovid :
' Ilh vetus, dominis eti.im casa parvaduobus,
Verlitur in templum : furcas subiere columnse.' — Ovid. lib. viii.
" The principal remains of the most ancient examples of the Indian or
Hindu style which have been recently discovered, are of a singular and
extraordinary kind, being mostly excavations in the solid rock. They are
supposed by some antiquaries to have been subterranean temples ; but many
portions of them are undoubtedly monumental or commemorative. Im-
mense sculptured caverns of this description have been discovered in various
parts of the Indies, which are wonderful monuments of the skill and industry
of the people who achieved them. These subterraneous caverns are appa-
rently as ancient as the oldest Egyptian temples ; and M. D'Ancarville, in his
Recherches sur I'Origine, I'Esprit, et les Progres des Arts de la Grece, thinks
them anterior to the time of about two thousand years before Christ.
" Some archaiologists have supposed these wonderful sculptured caverns to
be no older than the first ages of Christianity, after the natives of India had
received the knowledge of the liberal arts and sciences from the Greeks. The
improbability of this hypothesis is apparent at the first glance ; for, in the
first place, the Greeks did not practise excavations ; and secondly, the style,
character, and execution, are as different as light and darkness from the
style, character, and execution of the architecture of the Greeks.
" Dr. Robertson, on the contrary, thinks them monuments of very remote
antiquity, as the natives cannot, either from history or tradition, give any in-
formation concerning the time in which they were excavated, but universally
ascribe them to the power of a superior race of beings. Thus Stonehenge
has been attributed to the magical power of Merlin the enchanter ; and the
devil is often celebrated as an architect of first-rate skill, and has given his
name to many a monument of human power.
" The columns found in these caverns are rudely formed ; and although
much inferior to Grecian beauty, are, in many instances, more agreeable to
the eye of taate than tho?e of Egypt, Their capitals represent round cush-
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. ^7
ions pressed down by the superincumbent weight. The elegance of some
of these columns is confirmed by Col. Call, formerly chief-engineer at Ma-
dras, who urges this circumstance as a proof of the early and high civiliza-
tion of the Hindus. ' It may safely be remarked,' says he, 'that no part of
the world has more marks of antiquity for arts, sciences, and civilization, than
the peninsula of India, from the Ganges to Cape Comorin. I think the carv-
ings on some of the Pagodas and choultries, as well as the grandeur of the
work, exceed any thing of the present day, not only for the delicacy of the
chisel, but the expense of construction ; considering, in many instances,
to what distances the component parts were carried, and to what heights
raised.'
"The column from a building near Muddumpore, as engraved in Daniels'
Views, although of great antiquity, has the elements of a beautiful style.
The gradation from the octangular base to the multangular shaft, setting off
to the circular upper shaft, is at once elegant, and possessed of the greatest
constructive strength. The masculine style of the recking, under the quadri-
frontal capital, is bold and characteristic.
"Another fine example of a monumental column worthy of notice is from
an ancient Indian temple near to Benares, a splendid, rich, and populous
city, on the north side of the Ganges, which is here very broad and the
banks very high. The appearance of Benares from the water is represented
by travellers as being very beautiful. Several Hindu temples embellish the
banks of the river, and many other buildings, public and private, ancient
and modern, of a style and execution truly magnificent.
" This singular and most beautiful column, which to the variety of India
adds many of the ornamental graces of the Grecian style, is thought by Mr.
Hodges, who made the drawing whence the plate in his work was engraven,
to have been of the age of Alexander. This eminent artist and indefatiga-
ble traveller conceived, from the striking resemblance which many of its parts
bear to the Greek style, that it must have been executed by Grecian artists
shortly after Alexander's expedition into India ; which, according to Dr. Ro-
bertson, was about one hundred and sixty years after the reign of Darius
Hystaspes. The biographer of Apollonius Tyraneus (ibid.) relates, that
when he visited India, three hundred and seventy-three years after Alexan-
der's expedition, twelve stupendous altars or monumental stones, which he
erected in commemoration of his exploits, were still remaining with legible
inscriptions. Be this as it may, the elements and style of this beautiful
monument of antiquity completely bear out the hypothesis of Mr. Hodges.
Its elements, perhaps from compliment to the country, are in every respect
Indian ; its ornaments are purely Greek ; its base, its shaft, its capital, are all,
2g ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
in shape, situation, and distribution, completely Hindu ; with its multangular
and mixed circular shaft, its quadiifrontal capital, and tress-shaped abacus.
Its decorative sculptures, are essentially and finely Greek. In its pedestal is
found the Grecian honeysuckle in its greatest purity ; the angles of the shaft
are embellished with the sacred water-leaves of the Hindu mythology ; above
these are Doric flutes ; and in the capital are found the leaves of the Greek
acanthus.
" For beauty of outline, graceful setting off from a square to an octagon,
and thence to a circle, for richness and purity of style, the column of Benares
stands unrivalled in Eastern art.
" A few more specimens of Indian monumental art are the series of exam-
ples from the early periods of the Mogul empire, which exhibit their modes
of construction both square and circular, and prove their early knowledge of
the arch, the cupola, and other difficult and scientific modes of construction ;
and to which the preceding observations are equally applicable.
" Anotlier proof of a similarity of style between the architecture of the
ancient Egyptians and Hindus, is their mutually using lofty spires hke the
obelisks of the former, and the monumental towers of the latter, as in the
tower of Allahabad, and the lofty conical obelisk on the Shikargah, or hunt-
ing-place of Feeroz Sliah, the Pyramids of Egypt, and the conical brick
monument in the Hadjepore district, referred to and described in the last
section.
" The monumental style of architecture among the Greeks comes into
a smaller compass than most other nations. The observations on their pure
and fine style will, therefore, be reserved to another section, when descanting
on their sacred buildings. Their principal monuments are the tower of the
winds, which was also a clepsydra, or water clock, and the beautiful little
choragic monument of Lysicrates, so celebrated for its elegant variation upon
the theme of the Doric order. Another no less beautiful is the choragic
monument of Thrasyllus, sometimes called the Lantern of Demosthenes,
so well known to every student of Athenian antiquities.
" The triumphal arches of the Romans are among the grandest architec-
tural monuments or luxuries of this magnificent people. Nothing which
could tend to perpetuate the fame of the conquerors was omitted in the
design. Some were constructed with two and others with three openings,
and the most magnificent were erected on the pubUc road called the Trium-
phal way.
" On a triumph being decreed, the Roman senate received the conqueror
at the Porta Capena, near the Tiber, which was the entrance to the city
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 29
from the Appian way. A brief description of them, for they very nearly
resemble each other, is all that the limits of this work will allow.
" The arch of Ausjustiis at Rimini has but a single opening, about thirty
feet in width, crowned wiili a pediment, contrary to tiie usual practice, which
was to leave them flat for a triumphal car. It is a beautiful specimen of
construction, but much mutilated.
" The arches of Titus at Rome and of Trajan at Beneventi, bear a great
resemblance to each other. The former is composed of that beautiful com-
posite order, which is said to have been the earliest use of this order.
'• The arch called the Arch of the Goldsmiths at Rome is a curious ex-
ample. It is small in size, has but a single opening, is covered by a flat
lintel, and is much embellished by sculpture.
'•The arches of Septimus Severus and of Constantine, are of three open-
ings. The latter is embellished with ornaments shamelessly stripped from
the arch of Trajan ; and from their absurd application, we are the more
disgusted with the barbarism of the despoiiers. The arch of Severus, the
ruins of which are represented in Piranesi, is in fine preservation, and serves
as a portico to the church of St. George, in Vellario.
" The Roman style of architecture possesses more variety of style and
buildings than that of Greece. The Roman people had also a more ex-
tended dominion, more personal and natural pride, and were more partial to
show and magniQcence, than the graver and more philosophical Greeks.
Hence arose the greater number and more splendid embellishments of their
architectural achievements.
" They also erected edifices to commemorate every great event; and much
of their aichitecture may be classed under the monumental stvle. ' When
the Romans wished to commemorate and perpetuate,' says Tacitus, 'the
remembrance of any remarkable event, they raised an altar-stone, and en-
graved thereon the particulars of the transaction.'
"This great historian relates, in his account of the public discussions
which ensued in Rome on the death of Augustus, that the objectors to the
honours paid to that emperor complained that the honours due to the gods
were no longer sacred. Temples were built and edifices erected to him. A
mortal man was adored, and priests and pontiffs were appointed to pay him
impious homage. This species of homage Augu.stus was wise enough to
dechne when alive; and Sue(onius says, 'although Augustus knew that
temples were often raised in the provinces in honour of the proconsuls, he
allowed none to be raissd to himself, unless they were at the same time
dedicated to the Roman people. In the city he absolutely refused all hen-
30 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
ours of the kind.' These facts prove that the raising and dedicating a tem-
ple was a common, nay, almost an every-day, transaction.
" Tacitus is perpetually adverting to the numerous architectural monu-
ments of his public-spirited countrymen. But unfortunately their character
in taste was inferior both to their wealth and their vanity. They cultivated
few things supremely but eloquence and the art of war ; and oratory and
the sword were the only steps to power and greatness in Rome. Greece
was fallen into a state of degeneracy. Point, antithesis, and conceit, were
the delight of vain preceptors who filled the streets of Rome, and held
schools of declamation, — which Cicero properly called Indus impudenticB ;
^and novelty, ornament, and bad taste, crowded their public monuments.
" With such a people architecture could not but flourish ; and had they,
like the Greeks, ennobled the profession of architecture as they did that of
the orator, as fine a taste would doubtlessly have prevailed in the one country
as in the other. Their very wars encouraged the arts. Statues and trium-
phal arches followed victory like a shadow ; and the spoils of the conquered,
prisoners of war, with various pictures of battles, mountains, and rivers,
were displayed with great pomp.
" Another instance of the architectural grandeur of the Romans, on the
authority of Suetonius, is worth reciting. Augustus, to perpetuate the
memory of his glorious victory at Actium, built the city of Nicopolis, near
the bay where he obtained his victory, establishing quinquennial games;
and, having enlarged an ancient temple of Apollo, adorned it with naval
spoils, and dedicated it to Neptune and to Mars.
"On tlie death of Germanicus, triumphal arches were ordered to be
erected at Rome, on the Rhine, and Mount Amanus in Syria, with inscrip-
tions setting forth the splendour of his actions, and in direct terms declaring
that he died in the service of his country. At Antioch, where his remains
were burned, a mausoleum was erected ; and at Epidaphne, where he died,
a cenotaph was constructed to his memory. Of the several statues and the
places where they were to be worshipped, 'it would be difficult,' says Tacitus,
' to give a regular catalogue. It was farther proposed that a shield of pure
gold, exceeding the ordinary size, should be dedicated to him in the place
allotted to orators of distinguished eloquence.'
" These marks of respect are of less value to the dead than to the living ;
and those who witness such grateful remembrances acquire thereby an
additional stimulus towards rivalling them.
" ' Victory and Westminster Abbey,' was a sentiment uppermost in ihe
mind of Nelson ; and they who are benefited by the services of statesmen
and by the victories of warriors, should not be sparing of durable monuments
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 31
of gratitude, even if it be only with the view of exciting the aspiration of
contempoiaiies.
" Of Roman architecture, the concealed author of Guy Mannering says,
'their fortifications, their aqueducts, their theatres, their fountains, all their
public works, bear the grave, solid, and majestic character of their language ;
and our modern labours, like our modern tongues, seem but constructed out
of their fragments.' Yet. with all this grandeur of conception and solidity
of execution, their works surprise more from their immensity of size than
the beauty of their detail. This produced an unnatural exaggeration of
style in all their arts. Tiieir architecture has given us the swollen compo-
site order ; their sculpture, the exaggerated style of the gladiator ; and their
latter poetry, the hyperboles of Lucan and of Slatius. The Colosseum
alone consumed more materials, and cost more money, than perhaps all the
temples of Athens put together ; and the Roman forum would possibly have
contained them all. Imperial Rome vied with the republic in architectural
splendour, and Julius Ceesar commenced a career of magnificence in the
provinces, and his nephew Augustus led the way among the emperors,
justly boasting that he found Rome of birch and left it of marble. It would
be well if a British Minerva could arise in imitation of the Athenian goddess,
and by her magic lance convert the half burnt bricks and compo and mastic
of modern London into even decent stone !
" One more species of monumental structures used by the ancient Romans
alone remains to be mentioned, their commemorative columns.
"They have several still remaining; one, dedicated to the Emperor
Phocas, stands near tlie temple of Concord. It is of Greek marble, fluted,
and of the Corinthian order, four feet diameter, and fifty-four high including
the pedestal. Another worthy of notice is that of Marcus Aurelius, erected
by the Roman senate and people in honour of that emperor for his victories
over the Marcomanni. Aurelius afterwards dedicated it to his father-in-law,
Antoninus Pius, as is expressed on the pedestal ; hence it is mostly called the
column of Antoninus. It is of the Doric order, eleven feet six inches in
diameter, and one hundred and forty-eight feet high.
"The loftiest, however, in Rome, is
'Trajan's column tall,
From wliose low base the sculptures wind aloft,
And lead, througli various toils, up the rough steep,
Its hero to the skies.'
Dter.
"This column is one of the most celebrated monuments of antiquity, and
has endured the stormy waste of time upwards of seventeen hundred years.
32 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
The column of Alexandria, commonly called Pompey's pillar, is about
ninety-five feet in height; Trajan's, including the pedestal and statue, one
hundred and thirty-two feet; and Wren's fine monumental column near
London Bridge, commemorative of the destruction and rebuilding of the
British metropolis, including the pedestal and vase of flames, two hundred
and two feet. The latter is quoted to show its superiority in point of height
and size over those of ancient Rome.
"British inonumental architecture. The next section of my subject
leads us to the obscure days of the ancient British monumental style; and
I confess the more I search, the more I am bewildered in fiction, fable, and
hypothesis.
" The commencement of the art in England was similar to its commence-
ment in every other country. The caverns and huts of the aborigines of
these islands were gradually improved from mere necessaries of life to com-
forts and luxuries.
" There exist in this country the most indisputable proofs of a primitive or
aboriginal style of architecture and successive introductions of foreign styles
at various periods of our histoiy ; and here again, it may be observed, does
architecture prove the truth of history.
" EoYPt' f"^y boast of its pyramids, India of its excavated temples, Italy
of its Peestum, and Greece of its Cyclopean works, alike defying history and
conjecture : yet England and Ireland possess antiquities as primitive, as
aboriginal, and as remote from accurate date, in the Avebury, the cromlechs,
the Slonehenge of England ; the round lowers, the excavations, the ruins
of the seven churches, and the bed of St. Kieven in Ireland.
" The origin of the architecture of a nation is so intimately connected
with that of the nation itself, that an inquiry into the one necessarily involves
the other; therefore, rejecting the fables of our earlier chroniclers, we must
search for the truth in the monuments themselves.
"Sir William Jones, in his luminous discoinse on the origin and families
of nations, says, with our great Newton, ' We must not admit more causes
of natural things than those which are true, and sufficiently account for
natural phenomena;' and that one pair at least of every living species must
at first have been created, and that one human pair was sufficient for the
population of our globe, in a period of no considerable length — on the very
moderate supposition of lawyers and political arithmeticians, that one pair
of individuals left on an average two children, and each of them two more
— is evident from the rapid increase of numbers in geometrical progression,
so well known to|those who have ever taken the trouble to sum a series of
as many terms as they suppose generations of men in two or three thousand
years.
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 33
" This profound philosopher then proceeds, with all the learning and scep-
ticism of a genuine searcher after truth, to compare the Mosaic account of
the peopling of our globe with probability and witli history ; and comes,
after a series of incontrovertible arguments, to the supposition that the children
of Japhet seem from the traces of Sclavonian names, and the mention of
their having been enlarged, to have spread themselves far and wide, and to
have produced the race which for want of a correct appellation we call
Tartarian : the colonies formed by the sons of Ham and Shem appear
to have been nearly simultaneous ; and among those of the latter branch he
foun.l so many names preserved to this day in Arabia, that he hesitated
not to pronounce them to be the same people, whom hitherto ^\'e have de-
nominated Arabs; while the former branch, the most powerful and ad-
venturous, of whom were the progeny of Cush, Misr, and Rama, names
remaining unchanged to this hour in Sanscrit, and highly revered by the
Hindus, were in all probability, the race denominated Indian.
" From several tours recently made in the most interesting parts of
Ireland for architectural antiquities, and from considerable investigation
into its liistory, the author is of opinion that that country was originally
peopled from the East. The ancient arcliitecture, the ancient religion,
the ancient language of Ireland and those of the inhabitants of Hindostan
and other oriental countries, coinciding in a wonderful manner.
" Hqual coincidences in their architecture occasionally recur ; the pyra-
mids of Egypt have narrow passages leading to dark chamhiers or temples
under ground. At Benares, the most ancient seat of liraminical learning,
there are also pyramids on a small scale with subterraneous passages,
which are said to extend many miles. These narrow passages leading
to the cell or adytum of the temple appear to render the only apartment
less accessible, and to inspire the votaries with more awe. There we find
a perfect resemblance between the worship of the ancient Egyptians and
the ancient inhabitants of Hindustan. The caves of the oracle at Del-
phos, of Trophonius, and of New Grange in Ireland, had narrow passages
answering the purposes of those in Egypt and India; 'nor is it unrea-
sonable to suppo.-e,' says Captain Wilford in his learned dissertations on
Egypt from the ancient books of the Hindus, ' that the fabulous relations
of the Grot in Italy, and of the purgatory of St. Patrick in Ireland, were
derived from a similar practice and motive which seem to have prevailed
over the whole pagan world, and are often alluded to in Scripture.'
"Ne.v Grange is one among many caverns in Ireland, which the au-
thor of this work has visited. It is a large mound or pyramid, smrounded
by a circle of stones, near the county town of Urogheda, about twenty-five
5
34 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
miles north of Dublin. The gallery is sixty-two feet long, and the arms
of the cross or transepts twenty feet each. The cupola over the centre
of the temple at the intersection of the cross is formed of long flat stones
projecting one over the other, till they meet in the centre like one of the
openings in the great Egyptian pyramid.
« The cavern is, he doubts not, of as great antiquity as any in Europe,
and was a burying-place of the ancient Irish, although its cross-like form
has induced some to think of the time of Christianity ; on its first opening,
a gold coin of the Emperor Valentinian was found in it, which Dr.
Llhwyd observes might bespeak it Roman, but that a rude carving at
the entry of the cave seems to denote it to be of a barbarous origin.
" Nothing is here said of the similarity between the names of Erin
(Ireland,) and Iran, (Persia,) conjectural etymologies being too vague for his-
torical research.
" The round towers of Ireland, (of which he has a list of nearly seven-
ty now remaining m various parts of the island, from Cork to the Cause-
way, and from Wexford to Limerick, the greater part of which he visited
and investigated,) their large and singular cromlechs, and innumerable
other antiquities, deserve a course of investigation to themselves.
"II. SACKED Architecture. To trace fully the origin and progress
of sacred architecture among the antediluvians, after wliat has been said
of the monumental architecture of that ancient period, would be to go over
almost the same ground, which was reviewed in the early part of the
fijst section ; therefore a brief survey of these ancient and problematical
times, with an account of the principal works in this class of architecture
and an analysis of principles, will be all that is necessary for this portion
of our work.
" Among uncultivated nations, such as modern refinement is pleased to
term savage, architecture as a fine art is scarcely known, and their paint-
ing and sculpture are as rude as their manners. We find those arts, with
music, dancing, eloquence, and poetry, m every country and among every
people which have arrived at the first degree of civilization ; and mankind
was certainly in this state in the earliest antediluvian times, after the fa-
milies of Adam's immediate progeny settled themselves.
" The connexion between architecture, and the rest of the arts and
sciences, with the laws, government, and manners of the people, are cu-
rious and useful subjects of inquiry. Their relations with the history of
the human mind are clear and indisputable ; although some shallow rea-
soners have affected to think them beneatii the notice of statesmeii and
ARCHITECTURALHISTORV. 35
philosophers, and that the fine arts are to be considered only as mere
amusements and relaxations to superior minds.
" Sacred architecture commenced with the first adoration of man to his
Creator. The first altar of a single stone surrounded by our grateful fore-
fathers offering the first fruits of their flock, and corn, and fruit, was the
first temple. Such were the cromlechs of Ireland and Britain, which soon
increased from the circle of stones to the beauty of the rotunda, and from
tlie wood-covered temple of ancient Attica to the full blown perfection and
splendor of the Parthenon.
" Idolatry added to the splendor of ancient temples ; and Ninus, the
first recorded idolater, the son of Belus or Nimrod, erected the earliest tem-
ple to the human gods of antiquity, in commemoration of his father, whom
he ordered to be worshipped, and dedicated a temple to him as Jupiter
Belus. This temple, which Herodotus describes as of splendid dimensions
and design, contained the celebrated brazen statue of Jupiter^ Belus, which
was cast about two hundred years after the flood, and is the same idol
mentioned in the Scriptures, under the name of Baal and Baal Phegor.
" In less than two hundred years after the flood, architecture was cultivated
in Chaldea, China, Egypt, and Phoenicia. Sacred edifices were among the
most splendid and costly of their productions. Among the sovereigns re-
corded in these ancient days is Semiramis, the wife of Ninus, who finished
in this age the stupendous walls of Babylon, which were reckoned among
the seven wonders of the world. This illustrious princess, to whom the ad-
ministration of the government was left by her husband, ascended the throne
about one thousand seven hundred years before the Christian era, and is one
of the earliest examples in history of a throne being filled by a female.
" Diodorus and other ancient writers relate, that among the splendid
works of this princess were the statues of Jupiter Belus, Ninus herself, her
son Nimas, and the chief men of her kingdom, botli warriors and statesmen.
She also erected a magnificent temple to Jupiter Belus, on the summit of
which she erected three statues of gold, representing Jupiter, Juno, and
Rhea.
" Many other similar works of grandeur and idolatry are mentioned in
history as having been erected by this princess, of which the necessary hmits
of this work will not find room even for enumeration. But it is well known
that there were several queens of Assyria of this name ; and these authors
may have attributed to the great Semiramis, the spouse of Ninus, the works
that were probably of another age, and by another princess of the same
name.
" From these ancient examples, founded on the authority of the most an-
36
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
cient historians, we find that sacred architecture flourished in a splendid
manner even in these remote ages. None of these relations, magnificent and
splendid as they now are, (not even the walls of Babylon, the tower of
Babel, nor the extent of ancient Ninevah, which is said to have included a
circuit of nearly sixty miles,) should surprise us into an unbelief of their au-
thority from their stupendous dimensions alone ; for if we reflect upon the
existing pyramids of Ejypt, and know that the great wall of China,
also a work of high antiquity, is fifteen hundred miles in length, forty-five
feet in height, and eighteen feet in thickness, with towers of corresponding
proportions and reasonable distances, we need not doulH on these grounds.
Here again we find architecture bearing testimony to the tiuih of history.
" Architecture, having been thus successfully cultivated among the Assy-
rians, was carried by them into Egypt and other countries which they con-
quered.
" ' The first temples,' says Wren, ' were, in all probability, in the ruder
times, only little cellae (cells) to inclose the idol within, with no other light
than a large door to discover it to the people when the priest saw proper ;
and when he went in alone to ofier incense, the people paying adoration
without doors ; for all sacrifices were peiformed in the open air, before the
front of the temple : but in the southern climates a grove was necessary, not
only to shade the devout, but, from the darkness of the place, to strike some
terror and recollection in their approaches ; therefore, trees being always an
adjunct to the cells, the Israelites were commanded to destroy not only the
idols, but also to cut down the groves which surrounded them : but — trees de-
caying with time, or not equally growing, though planted at first in good
order, or possibly not having room — when the temples were brought
into cities, the like walks were represented with stone columns, support-
ing the more durable shade of a roof instead of the arbor of spreading
bou'^hs ; and still in the ornaments of stone work was imitated, as well
as the materials would admit, both in the capitals, friezes, and mould-
inn's, a foliage, or sort of work composed of leaves, which remains to
this age.'
" This was, in our ingenious countryman Sir Christopher Wren's
opinion, the true origin of colonnades environing the temples in double and
single aisles ; and there is no doubt but it was eq^ially the origin of the orders,
instead of being derived from the pioportions of the human body, as have
been assigned to them by imaginations more fanciful than correct, and to
which th 'V bear no reasonable analogy. What resemblance is there be-
tween a Doric column and a man of Herculean proportions, an Ionic column
and a matron, or a Corinthian column and a beauteous virgin 7 who, by the
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 37
way, is more overloaded with entablature and has more to sustain than
either of the other ordeis.
" In looking at a Grecian Doric column, it is asked, referring at the same
time to the historical origin of the order, does it more resemble a trunk of a
tree cut off immediately above the root and at the beginning of the spread-
ing of the branches, or the proportion of a man ? or at the Ionic, which the
Vitruvians called a decent matron with her locks parted over the foreliead,
does it not more resemble a slimmer trunk oramented with an abacus, and
the spirals formed of the ornamented back? The Corinthian certainly
more resembles, in sober practice, the foliage of a tree than the braided locks
of a youthful female.
" Few nations of antiquity cultivated sacred architecture with greater de-
votion or with more splendour than did the ancient Egyptians, particularly in
that part of their country called Thebais, or Upper Egypt. The chief
pride of this country was its principal city, Thebes. The Thebais is the
most southerly part of Egypt, nearest to Ethiopia, and was nearly as large as
the other two parts of Egypt together, including in its boundaries all the
country on both sides of the Nile down to Heptanomis.
'• At the time of the Trojan war, Thebes was reckoned the most opulent
and the best peopled city in the world. Among the principal edifices of the
Thebais was the magnificent palace and temple of Meiiuion, which, accord-
ing to Strabo, stood in the city of Abydus, the second city to Thebes, about
seven miles and a half to the west of the Nile ; that a celebrated temple of
Osiris was near to it, that it was also famed for a deep well or pool of water,
■with winding steps all round it ; that the stones used in it were of an aston-
ishing magnitude, and the sculpture on them excellent.
" Among other principal structures which embellished this portion of
Egypt was the palace of Ptolemy, at Ptolemais, a city which he decorated
with many costly sacred buildings. Under the Ptolemies the style of archi-
tecture in Egypt sustained a complete revolution, and iheir buildings ap-
proached the style which was afterwards so beautifully refined by the Greeks,
who brought it to complete perfection ; yet they never reached that pure and
noble style which distinguished the tasteful inhabitants of Atlica.
" These works were probably executed by Greek architects, called into
Egypt by the Ptolemies and their successors. This conjecture appears the
better founded since a modern traveller. Granger, describes a temple which
he had seen of the Corinthian order ; and farther observes, in speaking of
a palace which he believes made part of ancient Thebes, that the capitals of
the columns were of the composite order, highly finished.
" The Thebes just alluded to was distinguished from Thebes in Boeolia
38 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
by the epithet Hecatoupylos, the huadred-gated Thebes. It was not only
the most beautiful city in all Egypt, but is supposed by Diodorus and other
ancient writers to have surpassed all others of its time in the know n world,
as well for the splendor of its buildings as for extent and the number of its
inhabitants.
" Homer says that Thebes was able to furnish twenty thousand chariots
of war. By this we may judge of the number of inhabitants which it con-
tained. Tacitus relates, that when Germanicus visited its magnificent
ruins, there were still to be seen, on ancient obehsks, a pompous description,
in Egyptian characters, of the wealth and grandeur of the place. From
the account of an elderly priest, who interpreted to him the meaning of the
hieroglyphics, it appeared that Thebes at one time contained witliiu her
walls no less than seven hundred thousand men capable of bearing arms.
The objects, however, which most concern the present work, are its sacred
edifices. Its four principal temples were of an immense size and of a singu-
lar beauty of workmanship. The gold, ivory, precious stones, and other
costly and valuable ornaments with which they were decorated, were stripped
off and carried away by the Persians when Cambyses conquered and ra-
vaged Egypt.
" At Cnuphis, a city of the Thebais, so called from the god of that name,
was a magnificent temple dedicated to that idol. At Carnack, another large
city near Thebes, there are still the remains of a superb temple of Jupiter,
now the most perfect in that part of Egypt. The magnificent temple of
Apollo, at Apollonopolis, was one hundred and seventy feet long, one hun-
dred and eighty feet broad, and seventy feet high, as appears by the ruins
which still remain. The characters of all these buildings bear a close re-
semblance to each other, and are standard characteristics of Egyptian archi-
tecture. The inhabitants of Tentyra, or Dandera, were great worshippers
of Iris and of Venus. From the splendid ruins of this city it appears that
their temples were more beautiful and splendid, and in a better style of art,
than any others in Egypt.
" The resemblance between many ancient and distant nations, in their
language, manners, customs, architecture, and sculpture, are very great, but,
when first causes are investigated, by no means surprising. Sir William
Jones, in his invaluable discourses which are the concrete of many volumes,
observing on the language, manners, and antiquities of the ancient inhabit-
ants of India, comes to the indisputable result that they had an immemorial
affinity with the ancient Persians, Ethiopians, and Egyptians ; the Phoe-
nicians, Greeks, and Tuscans; the Scythians, or Goths, and Celts; the
Chinese, Japanese, and Peruvians : and it will be our endeavor to show
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 39
m the course of this article, in whicli the architecture of these various coun-
tries are respectively discussed, that their ancient buildings all corroborate
and prove this important fact in the history of mankind.
" The singular and extraordinary subterraneous temples at Elephante,
Ellora, and other parts of India, are curious objects of investigation, and are
alluded to in the first section of this article. Mr. Goldingham, one of the
honorable the East India Company's astronomers at Fort St. George, who
had appUed himself with great assiduity to the study of the antiquities
of Hindustan, visited the Elephanta Cave in 1795, and published an inter-
esting and faithful account of this wonderful effort of human skill in the
fourth volume of the Asiatic Researches. This gentleman argues with
great ability in favour of its having been a Hindu temple ; but General Carnac
of Calcutta, who introduced and prefaced Mr. Goldingham's paper, and un-
derstood the antiquities of India in no common way, does not assent to this
opinion. These immense excavations, cut out of the solid rock, appeared
to the general to be operations of too great labor to have been executed by
the hands of so feeble and effeminate a race of beings as the aborigines of
India have generally been held, and still continue to this day ; and that the
few figures which remain entire, represent persons totally distinct in exterior
from the present Hindus, being of a gigantic size, having large prominent
faces, and bearing much resemblance to the Abyssinians, who inhabit the
country on the west side of the Red Sea opposite to Arabia.
" There is no tradition, says the general, of these caverns having ever
been frequented by the Hindus as places of worship ; and at this period, he
adds, on his own authority, that no poojah, or sacred adoration, is ever per-
formed in any of them, and that they are scarcely ever visited by the natives.
He says that he recollects particularly the Ragonath Row, a Bramin versed
in the archaiology of the East, when at Bombay, did not hold them in any
degree of veneration ; and yet an intelligent writer in the Archaiologia (vol.
vii. p. 286, &c.,) who visited the Cave of Elephanta in 1782, states that he
was accompanied by a sagacious Bramin, a native of Benares, who, though
he had never been in it before that time, recognized at once all the figures,
was well acquainted with the parentage, education, and life of every deity or
human personage there represented, and explained with fluency the mean-
ing of the various symbols by which the images were distinguished. This
is undoubtedly a clear proof that their mythology of the present day is not
materially different from that delineated on the walls of these excavations ;
the most remarkable of which is at Elephanta, a small island in the harbor
of Bombay. An elephant of black stone, large as the life, is seen near the
landing place, and probably gave its name to the island. The cavern is
40 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
about three quarters of a mile from the beach ; l]ie path leading to it passes
throuf h a valley ; the hills on either side are beautifully clothed, and, except
when interrupted by the tuneful notes of the birds which dwell upon the
island, a solemn stillness prevails, which admirably prepares the mind for
contemplating the approaching scene.
" The cave is formed in a hill of stone, is about one hundred and thirty-
five feet square, and nearly fifteen feet high. Its ma sy roof is supported by
rows of columns, which are disposed with great regularity. Gigantic figures,
in relief, are sculptured on the walls ; « hich, as well as the columns, are
shaped out of the solid rock by artists of some ability, and of unquestionable
and astonishing perseverance.
'■' The excavations of Salsette, which is about ten miles north of Bombay,
are other astonishing specimens of the sacred archiieciure of ancirnt India.
The artist employed by Governor Boon to make drawings of them, as-
serted that it would require the labor of forty thousand men for forty years
to excavate and carve them. They are situate near to Ambola, a village
about seven English miles distant from Tanna.
" This excavation resembles that of Elephanla both in styl^, design, and
execution ; but being wrought in a softer rock, the sculptures are not so per-
fect as that, nor of another at Canara, which is situate about ten English
leao-ues from Tanna on the north of the excavations at Ambola, a sin ilar
example of subterraneous sacred architecture. There are others in the
country, but none equal in beauty to those just mentioned. Some of them
are very lofty, and appear from apertures in ilie sides, as if for floors, that
they have been used for dwellings, which surmise is strengthened by the en-
tire absence of sculpture in them.
" The excavated pagoda of Indur Subha, or Sabha, is also a fine speci-
men of the sacred architecture of this ancient people. It is situated near
Dcwlatabad; in which nLighborhood is also another, called the pagoda of
Raraswa Rama Saba. Dowlatabad is a fortified town in the Deccan of Hin-
dustan, fifteen miles from Aurungabad, the capital of Dowlatabad or Arned-
nagure. They are also cut out of the natmal rock, and for the space cf nearly
two leagues ther.; is little else to be seen tl an a succession of these subter-
raneous pagodas, in which there are thousands of figures, appearing from
the style of their sculpture to have been of ancient Hindu origin.
" The height of the excavated pagoda of Indur Subha is forty feet, its
depth fifty-four feet, and its breadth forty-four. The height of the obelisk
by the side of the pagoda is twenty-nine feet, including its pedestal and a
group of human figures which is on the top. The obelisk is fluted and orna-
mented with some taste, and has a light appearance. On the other side is
A RCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 41
the representation of an elephant, whose back just rises above the front
wall, but is without rider or howda. The plans of these excavated temples
are as regular as if tliey were built ; and the piers, pilasters, or square co-
lumns, are equidistant and sculptured in a bold and original style. Compare
the excavated temples of India with the constructed ones of Egypt, and
their resemblance will be found most striking. Both these styles are evidently
derived from excavations, and in both arc found close intercolumniations,
low and short archi'raves, and colunms of short stature rudely sculptured.
Nor is there any very apparent dillerence to show whether the construction
be not an excavation, or the excavation a construction.
" Before leaving the sacred architecture of Hindustan, the beautiful and
picturesque ruins of the ancient mosque of Dacca should not be omitted.
This metropolis is a city of Bengal lying on the banks of the Ganges,
is the third city in the province for extent and population, and has large
manufactories of the finest muslins and silks. This interesting part of
India was not visited by the Messrs. Daniells, nor till recently by any
European artist. The striking peculiarities of this fine specimen of sa-
cred architecture, to which my attention was first called by the beautiful
engravings of the anti([uities of Dacca, by Mr. Landseer, are their light-
ness and elegance, their square rectangular panelhngs, which are pecu-
liar to these structures, their arched perforations somewhat resembling the
Gothic, their lofty light octangular minarets, the beautiful play of light
and shade over the elevation, and the elegantly proportioned cupola which
crowns and finishes the whole, renders it a valuable study for the young
architect, and equally interesting to the amateur and antiquary.
" During tlie early period of the chronology of this section, that is,
about one thousand five hundred and eighty-two years before the Christian
era, Cecrops left Egypt, to colonize ancient Greece, where some authors
assert that he built twelve cities. He taught the Greeks the art of build-
ing, and founded a city, which he named after himself, Cecropia ; and to
put his new colony into a state of perfect secuiity, erected a fortress on
rising ground, where they afterwards built the temple ; and to about the
same period is attributed the founding of Troy by Scamander.
" Athens, Sparta, Cranaus, and Giecian Thebes, also owe their origin
to this period. Egypt was overcome by the Jithiopians, but its indestructi-
ble edifices bade defiance to the flames.
« Tyre was liuilt aJwut the year 1060 before Christ, and a curious exam-
ple of their sacred architecture is in the temple of Dagon, which the Bible
represents to have been destroyed by Samson, who pulled it down, and
destroyed himself and all the people who were assembled to worship the
6
42 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.'
idol and to make sport witli their captive. The temple is described to have
had two main pillars or columns on which it stood, and that Samson
standing between the two pulled them down, and hm'led the temple into
inevitable destruction.
" The structure of such a building has puzzled many a commentator
and critic, but Sir- Christopher Wren, whose learning and reading were
equal to his skill in architecture and mathematics, has given so clear an
elucidation as to render its mode of construction perfectly intelligible. In
considering what this fabric must be, that could at one pull be demolished,
he conceived it to be an oval amphitheatre, the scene in the middle,
where a vast roof of cedar beams resting round u)ron the walls, centered
all upon one short architrave, that united two cedar pillars in the middle;
one pillar would not be sufficient to unite the ends of at least one hundred
beams that tended to the centre ; therefore he says there must be a short
architrave resting upon two pillars, upon which all the beams tending to
the centre of the amphitheatre might be supported. Now if Samson, by
his miraculous strength pressing upon one of these pillars, moved it from
its basis, the whole roof must of necessity fall.
" Before leaving this portion of the work a few lines must be devoted
to the mausoleum or temple of Teshoo Lama at Thibit and the temple
or pagoda of Shoomadoo at Pegu, both sacred buildings of high antiquity.
" The mausoleum requires no particular description : its characteristics
are the most ancient and simplest Chinese, its proportions in good taste,
and its mode of execution excellent.
" The other, which is a large and splendid conical structure, is the
great temple or pagoda, called Shoomadoo Praw, situated between India
and Ch'ma, but partaking more of the style of the latter people than of
the Hindus. Its pyramidal shape is graceful, its apex approaches even
to the elegant, and, except a tendency to the florid style, its accessories
are rich and beautiful.
" This singular building is called the temple of Shoomadoo, or the
Golden Supreme ; compounded of the Birman word shoo, golden, and
madoo, a corruption of the Hindu word, maha deo. Its addition Praw
signifies in the Birman language Lord, and is always annexed to the
name of every sacred edifice. As a farther proof of this hypothesis of
the Indian derivation from Egypt may be added, that phra is the proper
name under which the Egyptians first adored the sun, before it received
the allegorical appeUation of Osiris, or author of time.
"This extraordinary sacred edifice, according to Col. Symes, who de-
lineated and described it a few years since, is bulit upon a double terrace,
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 43
one raised above the other. The lower and greater terrace is quadran-
gular, and raised about ten feet above the natural level of the ground.
The upper terrace is smaller, of a like shape, and raised about twenty
feet above the lower.
" The length of one side of the lower terrace is about one thousand
three hundred and ninety feet, and of the upper six hundred and eighty-
four. These terraces are ascended by flights of stone steps, and on each
side are dwellings of the Rahans, or priests. The temple itself is an octan-
gular pyramid, built of brick and fine shell-mortar, without any excavation or
cavity of any sort. Each side of the octagon, at the base, measures one
hundred and sixty-two feet. This immense breadth diminishes abruptly
to a spiral top, and may not be inaptly compared in shape to a speaking
trumpet.
'■ In defining the styles which prevailed at this period of history, we
should consider that the orders are not only Greek and Roman, but
Phoenician, Hebrew, Egyptian, and Assyrian ; therefore are founded upon
the experience of all ages, promoted by the vast treasures of all the great
monarchs, and skill of the greatest artists and geomometricians, every one
emulating each other : experiments in this kind being very expensive and
errors incorrigible, is the reason that the principles of architecture should
be founded more on the study of antiquity than a dependence on fancy.
Beauty, firmness, and convenience, are the principles ; the first two de-
pend upon geometrical reasons of optics and statics, the third only makes
variety.
" Wren well oljserves, that there are natural causes of beauty. Beau-
ty is a harmony of objects begetting pleasure by the eye. Tliere are two
causes of beauty, natural and customary. Natural beauty arises from
geometry, consisting in uniformity (that is equality) and proportion ; cus-
tomary beauty is begotten by the use of our senses, to those objects which
are usually pleasing to us for other causes, as familiarity or particular in-
clination breeds a love to things not in themselves lovely. Here Ues the
great occasion of errors ; here is tried the architect's judgment ; but al-
ways the true test is natural or geometrical beauty.
" ' Geometrical figures,' he continues, ' are naturally more beautiful than
other irregulars ; in this all consent as to a law of nature. Of geometri-
cal figures, the square and the circle are most beautiful ; next the paralle-
logram and the oval. Straight lines are more beautiful than curved ; next
to straight Unes equal and geometrical flexures ; an object elevated in the
middle is more beautiful than if depressed.' (See Parentalia, p. 352, and
Elme's Life of Wren.)
44 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
" The Egyptian, Hindu, Chinese, and otlier styles, having no immediate
relation to the present section, the next step will be to the wisdom of the
orders as practised by the Greeks. The Greek style of architecture is
divided into three modes or orders ; namely, the Doric, the Ionic, and
the Corinthian : named from the countries which gave them birth, or are
said to have been the first to use them. The sacred edifices of tlie Greeks
are the most ancient as well as the most beautiful of all the buildings of
that tasteful people that have reached our times. The great superiority
of the Greeks in architecture, is to be traced to causes similar to those
which occasioned their pre-eminence in every thing else ; namely, a deep
investigation into first principles, and ati accurate perception of the
elements of all that they attempted to execute.
" A similar investigation, and a similar perception or knowledge, and
nothing else, will produce the Uke effects in our country and in our times.
In Greece, no painter proceeded without acquiring a knowledge of anato-
my and drawing. Their sculptors carved their own marble, and their
architects understood design, construction, perspective, and composition, and
had a clear preconception of effect.
" It has been said that the Greeks did not understand anatomy, and did
not dissect ; that we are uncertain as to their knowledge of geometry, be-
cause Euclid, the earliest author in that science with whom we are at
present acquainted, lived considerably after the construction of their best
edifices ; and that our certainty as to their knowledge of perspective is
stiU less. It has also been asserted in corroboration that the Greeks had
laws prohibiting dissection ; therefore they did not dissect. ' The exception,'
says the great Lord Coke, ' proves the rule,' therefore even did not those
sculptural wonders wliich now grace our national museum, and the ana-
tomical details which are so abundant in the poems of Homer, prove the
depth of their anatomical knowledge, this very exception proves that they
did dissect, and that it was necessary to enact laws against the practice.
Among the most remarkable proofs of the deep knowledge of the Greeks
in anatomy, the Theseus and the Ilyssus of the Elgin collection, exhibit
the perfection of art, and show the most scientific research into anatomy and
the natural history of man.
" The divisions and subdivisions of the orders will come more appropriate-
ly in another section : therefore we proceed to the history of sacred architec-
ture among the Greeks.
" The religion and laws of the Greeks are acknowledged to have been de-
rived from the creeds and institutions of Egypt, and their styles of architec-
ture, in spite of the hypotheses and splendid fables of Vitruvius, were no less
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 45
adopted and improved from the same source. Herodotus assures us that the
worship of the greatest part of the first gods that were adored in Greece, came
from Egypt, and that all aniiiniity regarded the Egyptians as the first wlio
paid a solemn and public worship to the Deity, and therefore were the first in-
ventors of sacred architecture. In this derivation he exxepts only Neptune,
and says farther, that the worship of this deity was derived from Libya. Sa-
turn, Jupiter, Ceres, tfcc. were the first gods of Greece ; hence it is probable
that the Titans introduced these deities, and consequently, that those princes
came from Egypt : for the worship of Saturn, Jupiter, and Ceres was esta-
blished, according to Diodorus, from time immemorial. The Titans also
taught the Greeks the first elements of the arts and sciences, and their earliest
sacred edifices were first borrowed from them.
" Cadmus, who lived about 1500 years before the Christian era, and was
the grandson of Agenor, king of Tyre, brought the arts and sciences into
Greece, five hundred and sixty-two years after the building of the walls of
Babylon. In the part of Greece where he settled, he built a city, wliich he
named after the celebrated Thebes in Egypt, and doubtlessly imitated the
Egyptian style of architecture in his earhest structures. In corroboration of
this, Phny expressly states that Diedalus, the architect of the Grecian laby-
rinth, imitaled that of Egypt in every respect. This same Thebes after-
wards became so celebrated, that Germanicus made a journey purposely to
survey its magnificent ruins.
" Ogyges, Inachus the first king of Argos, Cecrops, Cadmus, Lelex, and
Danaus, founded successively the kingdoms of Athens, Argos, Sparta, and
Thebes ; but it was in the colonies of Asia Minor that sacred architecture
began to exhibit its greatest splendor. The invention of the first two Grecian
orders is attributed solely to the inhabitants of these countries, as their names
Doric and Ionic evidently import. The Corinthian did not appear in its
full perfection till long after these two orders.
" It seems to have been invented in Greece, properly so called, and is the
richest, the most magnificent, and the most elegant of all the Grecian orders,
and perhaps of any that architecture has ever invented.
" The first materials used by tlie Greeks in their sacred buildings was
timber ; next brick, which they learned the art of making from the Egyp-
tians. Stone next succeeded, as in the temple of Apollo at Delphon, built
by Amphyction ; and afterwards, when they had accomplished the complete
glories of their style, they immortalized it in marble.
" The character of the genuine architecture of the Greeks, in their bright-
est days, the days of Pericles, Alexander, Plato, Aristotle, Apelles, Phidias,
Sophocles, and Euripides, is that of an imposing grandeur united to pleasing
46 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
simplicity, elegance of ornament, and harmony of proportion in an eminent
de^^ree, too ether with a certain relation or coincidence of parts, as necessary
in works of art as in those of literature.
" Sacred architecture was carried to the highest perfection by the Greeks.
Indeed, the greater part of their fine and pure style which has reached our
times may be arranged under this class or department of civil architecture.
" Besides the beautiful simplicity and elegance of style which distinguished
the Greeks above all other nations, their able and sufficient style of construc-
tion is v^^orthy of study for its simplicity and for effecting its purposes by legiti-
mate means, although they did not aim at the arch, or vault, by which their
successors, the Romans, so signahzed themselves. And as their works sur-
passed all others, so did the beauty and excellence of their materials.
" In the lime of Pericles the Athenians used Pentelican marble, and a
species from Mount Hymettus, in their buildings. The sort called Parian
was the most admired, but it was almost exclusively appropriated to sculp-
ture. Bronze was also occasionally used for building in some of their early
structures ; and Pausahius mentions several buildings of this costly material,
particularly a small temple of Minerva, called on this account Chalcoecus,
which was standing in his days at Lacedeemon. Stones of an almost in-
credible size, after the manner of the Egyptians, were also amongst their
earliest modes of construction, whence originated the tradition that they
were the works of the Cyclops. In later periods they used stones of a smaller
size, of irregular polygon figures of four, five, and six sides, joined with the
utmost care and nicety.
"The walls of the ancient city of Psestum, are thus built of huge poly-
heedric masses. Chandeler, the Grecian traveller, discovered walls of this
method of construction near to Troezene, Epidaurus, and Ephesus ; and
Dr. Pococke also in the island of Mytelene.
" As architecture and mechanical skill advanced, they used cubical and
oblong stones, with which they constructed their walls after two methods : one
called Isodomon, which, as the word implies, was with courses of equal thick-
nesses and of equal lengths; and the other Pseudisodomon, where the
heights, or thicknesses, and lengths of the courses differed. The first, or
true manner, was always used in their grandest buildings, as being the most
beautiful ; and the latter, or false method, where beauty of appearance was
of less consequence.
" Another and still inferior mode was also used by them for works of less
consequence, and was called Emplecton. The front stones only, in this man-
ner of construction, were wrought ; and the interior was left rough, and
filled in with stones of various sizes or with rubble. It was principally used
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 47
in walls of great thicknesses, such as those wherewith they surrounded their
cities. In some instances they built their walls of brick or common stone,
and faced them with marble. Cement was seldom used bj' the Greeks in
their best works ; as the size and ponderosity of the blocks, and the great
exactness with which they were squared, were sufficient for solidity, and
made more perfect and complete joints.
" The ancient Greek architects, were, moreover, very careful that every or-
nament or decoration which they used should always accord in character and
situation with the order and the building to which they applied it ; and both
the order and the ornament were characteristic of the destination of the edi-
fice : never building a prison of the Corinthian order, nor a theatre of the
Doric. The external ornaments were bold, simple, and distributed with a
judiciously sparing hand. The pediment of the temple and the metopes of
the frieze, as in the temples of Minerva, and of Theseus at Athens, and of
Jupiter Panhellenius at Egina, were decorated with bassi relievi, and the an-
gles of the walls with pilasters or antse. The porticoes which surrounded
their public squares in which they often exhibited pictures, statues, and other
works of art, appear to have been more elaborately decorated than their tem-
ples, their theatres of declamation, and gymnasia ; and, with regard to interior
ornaments, little can be known, from the general destruction of those parts.
" The Greek style of architecture may be classed under^?'e different epochs,
according to the historical periods which gave rise io five corresponding styles
or modes. The first embraces the works of Trophouius, who built the tern
pie at Delphos, and those of Agamedes, and Da;dalus.
" Tills early period of Grecian hisiory, which may be termed the heroic
age, does not furnish any remains of architecture of positive certainty. Yet
those lights which are wanting from the deficiency of existing ancient ruins,
are supplied in some degree by ancient writers, who, however, are not suffi-
ciently explicit or circumstantial in those details which alone could give us the
information we require.
" Homer, for instance, in speaking of the palace of Priam, says that it had
at the entrance fifty apartments, well built, in which the princes, his sons,
lodged with their wives, and that it was surrounded by porticoes, wrought
with the greatest care. At the bottom of the court there were twelve other
apartments for the sons-in-law of that monarch, and a magnificent dwelling
for Paris, who is reported to have been a skilful architect. These all tend to
prove that the architecture was cultivated as an art in Asia Minor, although
it affords us no information as to style or taste.
" The second epoch includes from the time of Rhsecus of Samos, and
Theodorus, who lived about seven hundred years before the Christian era,
48 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
down to the time of Pericles ; in wliicli period fluurislied Ctesiphon, Metagcnes,
Andronicus, Eupolenius, Calliniachus, Libon, and otlier eminent and cele-
brated architects.
" The third epoch is the period from Pericles to that of Alexander the
Great ; under the former, architecture reached the summit of its perfection —
a perfection of which Sir William Jones, with his accustomed truth and per-
spicuity, says, ' in those elegant arts, which are called fine and liberal, it is
really wonderful how much a single nation, has excelled the whole world :
I mean the ancient Greeks, whose sculpture, of which we have excellent re-
mains both on gems and in marble, no modern tool can equal ; whose archi-
tecture we can only imitate at a servile distance, but are unable to make one
addition to it without destroying its graceful simplicity ; whose poetry still de-
lights us in youth, and amuses us at a maturer age ; and of wliose painting
and music we have the concurrent relations of so many grave authors, that
it would be strange incredulity to doubt their excellence.' In this brilliant pe-
riod flourished Hippodamus of Miletus, Phidias, Ictinus, and Callicrates, who
were conjointly employed in the building of the great temple of Minerva at
Athens called the Parthenon.
" The fourth great epoch is that which extends from the decease of Alex-
ander the Great to that of Augustus. Alexandria, under the dominion of
the Grecian monarchs, was the principal school of the great architects of this
period, among whom Dinocrates — whose proposal of forming Mount Athos
into a statue of Alexander the Great, and subsequent founding of Alexandria,
is celebrated by Vitruvius — and Sostrates were the most eminent.
" ' I cannot conceive,' says Spence, in his entertaining anecdotes of the
great men of his time, ' how Dinocrates could ever have carried his proposal
of forming Mount Athos into a statue of Alexander the Great into execution.
' For my part,' replied Pope, ' I have long since had an idea how that
might be done ; and if any body would make me a present of a Welsh moun-
tain, and pay the \vorkmen, I would undertake to see it executed. I have
quite formed it,' he continued, 'in my imagination. The figure must be in
a reclining posture, because of tiic hollowing that would otherwise be neces-
sary, and for the city's being in one hand. It should be a rude unequal hill,
and might be helped with groves of trees for the eye-brows, and a wood for
the hair. The natural green turf should be left wherever it would be neces-
sary to represent the ground he reclines on. It should be so contrived that
the true point of view should be at a considerable distance. When you were
near it, it should still have the appearance of a rough mountain ; but, at the
proper distance, such a rising should be the legs, and such another an arm.
It would be best if a liver, or rather a lake, were at the bottom of it, for a rivu-
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 49
let that came through his other hand to tumble clown tlie hill and discharge
itself into it.'
" It is somewhat singular that Mr. Pope should have thought this mad
project practicable ; but it appears that there are still persons who dream
of such extravagant and fruitless undertakings. Some modern Dinocrates
had suggested to Buonaparte to have cut from the mountain called the
Simplon an immense colossal figure, as a sort of genius of the Alps. This
was to have been of such an enormous size that all the passengers should
have passed between its legs in a zigzag direction.
" During this fourth epoch are found the names of Saurus and Batrachus,
who executed several works in Rome ; not being allowed to inscribe on
them their names, used the expedient of carving a lizard and a frog upon
the pedestals, as anagrams of their names, o-sew/jo? signifying in Greek a
lizard and ^a.T^cc)(,6c, a frog.
" The fifth and last great epoch of Grecian architecture comprehends
from the time of Augustus, in whose days Vitruvius is supposed to have
flourished, until the removal of the seat of empire to Constantinople.
" The pure architecture of Greece is superior to all that preceded it, and
all that has been designed and executed since. Its architects and sculp-
tors never violated the inherent properties of any oliject for an artificial
effect ; while those of Rome perpetually committed such violations, dete-
riorating all that they laid their hands upon. The irregular and fantastic
variety of their orders proves the truth of this accusation, and powerfully
opposes itself to the beautiful simpicity of the Greeks. The Romans exe-
cuted works containing gross infringements of the sounder laws of archi-
tectural taste, which have, however, obtained a general and lasting reputa-
tion.
" Such is the Colosseum, such is the theatre of Marcellus, such are their
amphitheatres, such is the Pantheon ; structures that excite wonder, and
seize upon our admiration, certainly not for the faults with which they
abound, but in spite of them.
" The architecture of the Romans undoubtedly possesses splendor, vast-
ness of conception, a noble carelessness of expense, and a profuse redun-
dancy of decoration in all their public buildings ; which, as Q,uintilian ob-
serves, is more easily cured than barrenness : and if they are to be praised
for their great knowledge of scientific construction, and bold command of
the arch, the vault, and the cupola, they most amply deserve it ; but cer-
tainly they were never eminent for that purity of taste, elegance, and sim-
plicity of invention and construction, which characterize the Greeks above
all others. Hence are to be found so many more models of a fine style
7
50 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
among the Greeks than among the Romans. Give me simplicity and good
design, and keep your ornaments for children
" The Romans are indebted for all the excellencies of their style of
architecture to the Greeks, and its deficiencies and redundancies are all
their own. Their earliest architects were all Greeks, and it was not till
late in their history that they made any figure in the arts of design. Thus
all the Roman architects, with Vitruvius at their head, follow the plans that
were laid down for them by the great master-spirits of Greece. They
every where imitate the Greeks, and every where misrepresent them, as
may be seen in comparing the Doric of the temple of Minerva Parthenon
with that of the theatre of Marce'lus, the very best of the Roman specimens,
and the Ionic capitals selected from Greek and Roman specimens. Cora-
pare them together, and they will be found comments upon each other ;
the one showing the commanding excellence of purity of style, the other the
glitter and frivolity of false decoration.
" That which Cicero says so truly of the qualities requisite to a fine oration
may as correctly be applied to the qualities necessary to a fine piece of archi-
tecture : ' Let ornament,' he says, ' be manly and chaste, without effeminate
gaiety or artificial coloring ; let it shine with the glow of health and strength.'
" Had the taste of Vitruvius been as refined and as unsophisticated as that
of Cicero, the Roman purity in architecture would have been upon an
equality with that of their fine and majestic language. But on the contrary
we find very many of their buildings frivolously and effeminately rich in
ornament, and miserably deficient in invention and good taste. For with
fillets upon fillets, — with bands over beads, and beads over bands, cavettos
and cimas both right and reversed, — with ornamented plain faces (excuse the
bull) carvings dentals and denticals, drop flowers and festoons, and other
tawdry misplaced and misapplied ornaments, — they disfigured their spolia-
tions firora the Greeks. As examples, look at any Roman specimens, par-
ticularly that of the temple of Concord at Rome, and compare it with any
of its lovely originals from Greece. Of these expensive barbarisms may be
truly said, that they are
' Of such a frightful mien,
As to be hated need but to be seen.' — Pope.
Yet such things find their admirers even in our days, and we need not
travel out of the metropolis to witness them. Little however, was it to have
been expected, after the many introductions to this country of the pure forms
and fine proportions of Greece, by Stuart, Wilkins, Cockerel], and other
eminent architectural travellers, that Batty, Langley, and Barroraini, would
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 51
in our clays have driven the Athenian antiquities from our shelves, and the
purity of Grecian art from our streets, and substituted imitations of the alto-
gether inferior productions of Rome and modern Italy.
" To the sacred architecture of Greece, as exhibited in their various
temples, we are indebted for the purest and best canons of architecture that
the world has ever seen.
" The elements of this pure style are three classes or modes called orders,
while those of the Roman style, its despoiling imitator, are five.
" Nature dictates but three essential modes of building, which are clearly
and distinctly visible in every style of their art ; namely, the robust, the
chaste, and the elegant. Those three essentials in the art the Greeks have
embodied in their Doric, their Ionic, and their Corinthian. But the Romans,
restless after innovation, sighing for more worlds of art to conquer, and
pining after more than all, would have one mo7-e robust than the robust, and
one more elegant than the elegant. Hence their Tuscan, which is but, as a
musician would say, a variation upon the theme of the Doric ; and the Com-
posite, which is any thing but an improvement upon the Corinthian.
" Architecture, that is to say, classical architecture, is generally divided into
certain modes or systems called orders, which are named from the country
whence they are supposed to have been derived or invented ; as the Tuscan
from Tuscany, the Do'ic from Doria, the Ionic from Ionia, the Corinthian
from Corinth, and the Composite or Roman from Rome. Now, although
the preceding orders form five in number, yet three only are to be received as
such, in the pure or Grecian style of architecture. The Tuscan, as I have
already said, and will hereafter prove when I arrive at the Roman system, is
merely a variation of the Doric ; and the Composite a corruption of the
Corinthian, and too much like it, both in essence and in character, to be dis-
tinguished by an untutored eye, or to be acknowledged a distinct genus or
order by the critic.
" Thomson, who may be called the poet of the fine arts, and whose taste
was formed by a long residence at the seats of ancient arts, with the son of
the Lord Chancellor Talbot, beautifully and characteristically depicts the
three orders in his • Liberty.' In the second part of that poem he personifies
public virtue in Greece as a goddess, and the sister arts of painting, sculpture,
and architecture, as
' The Graces they
To dress this sacred Venus.'
And farther on he states that architecture was
' By Greece refined,
And smiling high to bright perfection brought;
52 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
Such tliy sure rules, that Goths of every age,
Who scorned their aid, have only loaded earth
With labored heavy monuments of shame,
Kot these gay domes that o'er thy splendid shore
Shot, all proportion, up.
First, unadorned
And nobly plain, the manly Doric rose ;
Th' Ionic then, with decent matron grace,
Her airy pillar heaved ; luxuriant last.
The rich Corinthian spread her wanton wreath.
The whole so measured true, so lessened off
By fine proportion, that the marble pile,
Formed to repel the still or stormy waste
Of rolling ages, light as fabrics looked
That from the magic wand aerial rise.
These were the wonders that illumined Greece
From end to end.'
" These orders undoubtedly derived their origin from the chance-built
huts and cabins of the first inhabitants of the world, and which as doubtlessly
contained in themselves the constituent elements of architecture, till drawn
forth by the hand and eye of taste, as the marble block contained the statue
whence Canova drew forth his shining Hebe ever young. As we cannot
derive our knowledge of the origin of these elements of style from a better
source than from Vitruvius, he must be our guide through this obscure
path. In my description of the orders I must confine myself briefly and
generally to the three classical orders of antiquity.
" Vitruvius our best authority, indifferent as he is for historical truth,
informs us that when Dorus, the son of Helen us and the nymph Optice,
reigned over Achaia and all Peloponnesus, he built in the ancient city of
Argos a temple to Juno, which was formed by chance of the order since
called Doric. Afterwards the Athenians, according to the responses of the
Delphian Apollo, by the common consent of all Greece, sent out thirteen
colonies at one time into Asia, and appointed a leader to each colony, they
gave the command to Ion the son of Xanthus and Creusa, whom Apollo of
Delphos also acknowledged to be his son. These colonies were led into Asia
by Ion, who seized upon the country of Caira, where he built the large
cities of Ephesus, Miletus, Myunta, Priene, Samos, Teos, (fcc.
" Tliese states were called from their leader Ionia ; and here they began to
erect and dedicate temples to their deities : and first they built one to Apollo
Panionios in this manner in Achaia, and which they named Z)o?"«c, because
they had first observed it in the Dorian states. In this temple they intended
to use columns, but not knowing their symmetries, and while considering
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 53
how they should proportion them so that they might support the weight, and
at the same time have a graceful appearance, they measured the length of
the human foot, which as they found to be nearly the sixth part of the height
of a man, they used this proportion for their columns, making the thickness
of the shaft at the bottom one-sixth part of the height including the capital.
Thus the Doric column, having the proportions of the human body, began
to be used in building with solidity and beauty.
" Afterwards being desirous of building a temple to Diana, they invented
a new order on similar principles, using tlie proportions of a female. They
made the bottom diameter the eighth part of its height ; and that it might
appear the more graceful, tliey added mouldings round its base to represent
the shoe, and volutes to the capitals to imitate the twisted braids of hair
falling on each side, and the cymatium and encarpae, the locks of hair
braided and arranged on each side over the forehead. They also fluted the
shaft from bottom to top like the folds in the garments. Thus were the two
species or ordeis of columns invented ; one representing the strength and
simplicity of man, the other the elegance and fine proportions of woman.
Tliis latter order was called Ionic, says Vitruvius, because it was invented
by tire lonians. But subsequent architects, who wished for lighter propor-
tions, have often made the heights of the Doric column seven diameters,
and that of the Ionic eight and a half, destroying the character and beauty
of each.
" The third Grecian order, which is called the Corinthian, is imitative
of the delicacy of shape and slenderness of proportion of a young virgin.
' For the limbs,' says Vitruvius, ' at that early age, are formed more slightly,
and admit of more graceful decoration.' The invention of its capital is thus
related by Vitruvius :
" A Corinthian virgin just marriageable, being attacked by a fatal disorder,
died. After her interment, her nurse collected some vases and toys, which
pleased her when living, put them in a basket, and placed it on the top of her
tomb, covering it, that it might endure the longer in the open air, with a tile.
The basket being placed on a root of acanthus, depressed it in the middle,
occasioning the leaves and stalks which grew up in the spring to encircle
and twine round the basket ; but being resisted by the angles of the tile, they
convolved at the extremities in the form of volutes. This was seen by Calli-
machus, called on account of liis taste and skill in sculpture Catatechnos,
who, delighted with the novelty of its figure and its delicate and appropriate
form, encircled by the beautiful foliage, formed from its model a new capital
to some columns he had sculptured for Corinth, thus composing this most
elegant and beautiful of the orders.
54 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
" The above hypothesis is nothing but a splendid fable : notwithstanding
Mr. AVilldns says, that of ail the opinions entertained by Vitruvius on the
origin of the orders of architecture, that relating to the invention of the Co-
rinthian capital seems alone entitled to any attention ; both because the
reputed age of Callimachus, its supposed inventor, approaches within certain
limits to the first recorded instances of the introduction of the order into
Greece ; and because the recital is less open to the charge of absurdity and
fiction. Notwithstanding tliis, the account just quoted of the origin of the
Doric and the Ionic is not only less open to the charge of absurdity and
fiction, but may be considered as nearly historically true ; while the Vitru-
vian hypothesis of the vase of toys, the projecting tile, and the accommodating
acanthus, appears more worthy the reveries of a poet, and a fine poetical
episode it certainly ie, than of the historian of such an art as architecture.
"The Corinthian order is clearly derived fi-om the architecture of Egypt
adapted, refined, and naturalized. First, Cecrops, the founder of Athens,
was an Egyptian ; next Daidalus, the earliest Athenian artist, visited Egypt
to investigate and study the principles of the fine arts. Added to these facts,
it is also well known that the Greeks borrowed their laws, their manners,
and their customs from the Egyptians, purifying them in the alembics of their
own brighter genius.
" A colony at first always imitates its mother country ; and afterwards as
surely does all in its power to render its origin forgotten. When we refer to
examples of both styles, surely the Egyptian origin of the Corinthian capital
cannot be denied. Their elements are incontestably the same, namely, a
vase surrounded by flowers and covered with an abacus. The story of the
Corinthian girl was probably invented by a Grecian poet, and related as
authentic by Vitruvius.
" Mons. duatremere de Quincy, secretary to the French academy of arts,
corroborates tliis opinion, and supposes even the Ionic capital also to have
been borrowed from Egypt. He metamorphoses the ears of the head of Isis,
in an Egyptian capital, into the Ionic volutes ; the braids of hair on the
forehead into the helices, or threads of the capital ; the throat into the alarino,
or necking ; and so on.
" Following this ingenious hypothesis, the Doric may also be said to have
been drawn from the rude types or prefigurations of the Egyptians, which
contain all the primitive elements of the beautiful examples of the Greeks.
Belzoni farther corroborates it by saying, that the Isis of the Egyptians is
the same personage with the lo of the Greeks ; therefore capitals designed
after the head of this goddess are Isislike, lolike, or Ionic.
" Referring to any of the ancient Grecian temples, it will be seen that the
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 55
metopes, or spaces between the trylj'phs in the entablaturCj aie filled, and
sometimes with sculpture, as in the Parthenon, which were occupied by those
wonderful efforts of the chisel, now in the British Museum, representing
battles of tlie Centaurs and Lapithee. These metopes ia the earliest Greek
buildings were open, and the trylyphs justly represented the ends of the
beams of which they are the types ; as the following quotations from the
Iphigenia in Tauris proves. Pylades is counselling Orestes to scale the
Doric temple of Diana, and says to his friend,
' But w}ien the eye
Of" night comes darkening on, then must we dare,
And take the polished image from the slirine,
Attempting all things ; and the vacant space
Between the trylyphs, mark it well, enough
Is open to admit us ; by that way
Attempt we to descend.'
Iph. in Tau, Potter's Vers.
"The first general division of architecture being its orders, the next
division in sacred architecture is the several orders of temples or sacred
edifices. The orders of sacred buildings or temples of the Greeks are seven :
first, the Amis; second, the Prostyle; third, the Amphiprostyle ; fourth, the
Periptoral ; fifth, the Dipteral; sixth, Pseudo Dipteral; and seventh, the
Hypaethral.
" The first order of sacred buildings, called antis, is that wherein the ends
of the flank walls finish in pilasters or antse. Of tliis order is Inigo Jones's
fine Tuscan portico of St. Paul's Church, Covent Garden.
" The second or prostyle differs froin the antes by having columns in
front of the pilasters or antee; both these orders of temples have only a por-
tico at one end.
"The third or amphiprostyle order of temples is nearly the same as prostyle ;
but, as its name imports, has a posticum or portico at the rear the same as
the principal front.
" The fourth order, the periptoral, has also porticoes at both ends of six
columns each, and eleven, counting the angle columns at each side. It has,
as its name imports, columns all round about the cell, as in the temple of
Theseus, which by the way has two columns in flank more than the rules
of Vitruvius prescribe.
"The fifth or dipteral order, which Vitruvius places after the pseudo dip-
teral, is octastyle, or eight columned, like the portico of the Parthenon, but
has a double row of columns all round the cell.
" In the sixth, that is, the pseudo dipteral, or false dipteral, the porticoes
are octastyle, or eight columned, in front, and on each side fifteen columns,
56 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
including those of the angles. The Parthenon is of this ordei" of sacred
buildings, but has seventeen columns on the sides ; for the ancient architects
of Greece did not servilely follow every dogmatical rule of the critics, yet in
their variations they never lost the true spirit of the original.
" The hypsethral is the seventh order of sacred buildings, and is decastyle,
or ten columned, both in front and rear ; the other parts are distributed the
same as in the dipteral, but it has a double row of columns in its interior, one
higher than the other, continued on all sides, and resembling an interior
portico. The middle part has no roof. A fine specimen of this order of tem-
ples is to be found in that of Jupiter Olympus at Athens, and in one of the
three at Paestum. In Rome there is not a single example of the hypeethral
order.
" Before leaving the pure sacred architecture of Greece, a short space must
be devoted to that of its colonies and other distant parts.
"The ancient temple at Corinth is an architectural structure of unknown
aptiquity ; it is of the Doric order, and the proportion of its cohmms, from
actual measurement, is shown in Aikin's Essay on the Doric Order. Its
character is simple, pure, and bold, inferior to the three principal examples
found at Athene, but still partaking of the purest characteristics of the
order.
" Among other curious and interesting ruins are the three ancient temples
of Paestum. One of them differs from every other temple in the world,
having nine columns in the front, with a central range down the middle of
the cell, the use of which appears to have been to support the roof
" The central or hypaethral temple is generally supposed to have been
dedicated to Neptune, the tutelar divinity of Paestum or Possidonia. Mr.
Wilkins thinks it to have been a temple of Jupiter, from its being of the
hypsethral order, which is a class of building generally confined to the temples
of Jupiter. Its columns possess, in common with all its other parts, the
Greek character in the highest degree ; and there is no doubt of its being
coeval with the earliest migration of the Greeks to the south of Italy. These
examples, with that of Corinth, possess the characteristic energy of the early
style of the Greeks, which may be distinguished from their later and more
finished style by the following definitions ; namely, a shaft diminishing
rapidly and of low stature, a large and massy capital with a very bold pro-
jection of the abacus, a necking composed of three grooves, and an extremely
massive entablature of nearly one-half the height of the column.
" The author of the Pleasures of Memory, in some lines of characteristic
energy, written at Psestum. in March, 1815, says of these temples :
A R CniTECTUR AL HISTOa Y. , 57
" ' They stand between the mountuins and tlie sea,
Awful memorials ! but of whom we know not.
Time was they stood along the crowded street,
Temples of gods ! and, on their ample steps.
What various habits, various tongues beset
The brazen gates for prayer and sacrifice !
Time was, perhaps, the third was set for justice.
And here the accuser stood, and there the accused ;
And here the ji;dges sat, and heard and judged ;
All silent now ! as in the ages past,
Trodden under foot, and mingled dust with dust.'
They are indeed silent yet speaking menioiials of time and eteinily. Of
pEestuni and its twice-blowing roses, what lover of poetry has not heard of
those lovely flowers which
" ' Now a Virgil now an Ovid sang,
Pnsstum's twice-blowing roses ?'
" The next division of this section is the analysis of the Etruscan school
of architecture, which is, however, so lost in the lapse of ages, that it
leaves but little room for architectural research.
" The Etruscans are generally reported to have been equally distinguished
in architecture as in the other arts of design. The Romans employed Etrus-
can architects in the building of the capiiol, the temple of Jupiter, and many
other large and splendid edifices. The walls of Etruscan cities were lofty
and constructed of huge polyheedric masses of masonry ; remains of which
have been discovered at Volaterra, Cortona, Fassula, and other parts of an-
cient Etruria.
" The earliest temples of Etruria were small in size, being, in many in-
stances, not able to contain more than a statue of the divinity to whom it
was dedicated, and sometimes an altar.
" The sacred architecture of the ancient Romans, under their kings, is
undoubtedly derived from the Etruscans. This people, a colony from Greece,
were antecedent to all the rest of the Italian peninsula in cultivating the
arts, which they had practised even before the reputed tiine of Cadmus.
" The natural tendency of the ancient Romans v>'as to the grand and
wonderful, the colossal, the showy, and even the prodigality of expense ;
hence their amphitheatres, their circuses, their temples. Of all the antique
temples now remaining in Rome, the Pantheon is at once the most celebrated
and the most beautiful ; and may be considered the master-piece of Roman
architecture, whether we estimate it as when entire, or, as at present, strijiped
of all its statues and otlier ornaments. It is supposed to have been built by
8
58 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
Marcus Agrippa, son-in-law of Octaviiis Augustus, in his third consulship,
before the Christian era, and was dedicated to Mars and Jupiter the Avenger,
in memory of the victory obtained by Augustus over Marc Anthony and
Cleopatra ; but it is more probable, as Palladio thinks, that the body of the
temple was built in the time of the Republic, and that Agrippa added the
portico, and perhaps some other decorations, as the double pediments seem to
prove. It was repaired by Septimius Severus and Caracalla. The interior
was decorated with bronze ornaments in the panelling of tlie cupola, and
contained, in niches, statues of all the gods. The interior is no less fine and
striking than the outside ; and from its circular form is called by the Italians
Rotondo ; as from its containing statues of all the gods, it was named by the
ancients Pantheon, from 5r«» and Seos- The diameter, exclusive of the large
niches is one hundred and thirty-two feet, being nearly thirty feet more than
the cupola of St. Paul's, and the height from the pavement to the summit
the same as the diameter ; the thickness of the walls is nineteen feet, which
is relieved by the beautiful Corinthian niches now used as chapels and altars.
" Among other specimens of the sacred architecture of the Romans is the
temple of Concord, whose ugly capital has been before discussed, the temple
of Janus and of Romulus, of the Sun and Moon, of Fortuna Virihs, Vesta,
Minerva Medica, Neptune, Antoninus and Faustina, Jupiter Stator, — whose
beautiful entablature is so well copied in the portico of Carlton House, — and
the temple of Peace. The three magnificent arches now standing of this
latter edifice have been finely adopted by Sir Christopher Wren in the choir
of St. Paul's Cathedral.
" The declension of style from the days of Roman splendour may be wit-
nessed in the modern ItaUan churches, particularly in the churches of St.
John the Latcran, and St. Paul without the walls ; the most of their build-
ings were executed from the ruins of the antique temples which they bar-
barously despoiled for this purpose ; and when they had no longer skill to
place the connecting architrave, they substituted ugly and uncharacteristic
arches, as may be seen in the fine plates of it by Piranesi.
" The fine, original, and striking style of sacred architecture, called Gothic,
is of too much importance for a portion of so small a share of a brief work
like the present ; but a short view will serve better than a total omission.
" The earliest British style is called Saxon ; and its elements are heavy
round columns and semicircular arches, bad resemblances of the worst Tus-
can covered with the round arch of the middle ages.
" As a proof that the decline of the Roman style produced the Saxon,
which was called by the monks Opus Romanum, we have only to conceive a
country mason, ignorant of art, but skilful with his chisel, to have observed a
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 59
Composite capital of the depraved style of those of the temple of Bacchus
on the Mount Viminalis at Rome, or the Ionic capitals of the temple of Con-
cord, or even a respectable Corinthian, and to be desired, at some considerable
interval of time, to carve some capitals as nearly resembling them as possible
from memory. Imagine tliis, and it may be asked whether it be not more
than probable tliat they would resemble the Saxon capitals of St. Bartholomew
the Great in Smithfleld, or those of the crypt of Lastingham Priory. Hence
we may fairly conclude that the origin of the Saxon style may be traced to
the decadence of the Roman ; and that the introduction of tlie Saracenic,
Arabesque, and Grotesque styles ; aided by the practical and scientific im-
provement of the workmen, and by the knowledge of the society of travel-
ling architects, the early freemasons, produced that singularly romantic and
beautiful style called the Gothic.
" ' A Doric temple differs from a Gothic cathedral, says Mr. Hazlitt, ' as
Sophocles does from Shakspeare. The principle of the one is simplicity
and harmony, that of the other richness and power. The one relies on
form and proportion, the other on quantity, and variety, and prominence
of parts. The one owes its charm to a certain union and regularity of
feeling, the other adds to it effects from complexity and the combination
of the greatest extremes. The classical appeals to sense and habit, the
Gothic or romantic strikes, from novelty, strangeness, and contrast. Both
are founded in essential and indestructible principles of human natiu-e.
" The style now before us has been sweepingly designated, as being
any thing that is not Grecian ; but whether this affected antithesis proceed
from humor or contempt is not certain.
" Our illustrious countryman. Wren, whose mechanical and mathemati-
cal skill elevates him above all modern architects, called this fine style a
gross concameration of heavy, melancholy, and monkish piles. Now, it cer-
tainly is the very reverse of this definition, and is not cjuite so much opposed
to Grecian art as was thought by the professor before quoted ; but on the
contrary, is a style of architecture pure, grand, impressive, and character-
istic. The elements of it are spires, pinnacles, lofty pointed or lancet-shaped
windows, and elevation as opposed to the horizontal hue of the Greeks.
Its character somewhat resembles that of the old German school of painting ;
and a fine Gothic building, with its elaborate and carefully marked de-
tails, its gaudy colors, its vermillion, and its leaf gold, reminds one of Al-
bert Durer and his hard but correct school.
" England is the classic soil for this style of architecture, as ancient
Greece is for that of the orders ; and here the student must come to
measure and to study it. York Minster is the Parthenon of Gothic
GO ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
architectuie, 'Westminster Abbey the Thesenni, and the Chapel or Maui?o-
leum of Henry VII. the choragic monument of Lysicrates. Among the
finest specimens is the venerable Abbey Church at St. Alban, in Hert-
fordshire, which is also one of the most valuable documents in the
archaiologieal history of the country.
" Gothic architecture disdains the trammels and the systems of the
schools ; nevertheless, it has its own laws, its genera, and its species, al-
though they have not yet been arranged in a grammatical form. Batty
Langley endeavoured, it is true, to reduce it to a system, and to engraft on
it the five orders of the Palladian school, instead of a more natural and
philosophical arrangement ; but his efforts were altogether vain and nuga^
tory.
"III. Domestic Architecture, perhaps the most interesting depart-
ment of the art, indigenous to every country where human reason has
in any degree manifested or developed itself. Like all the productions of
nature, architecture assumes different forms, according to the properties of
the cUmate, the wants it may superinduce, the ciuality of the soil, the build-
ing materials, and the personal character of the human beings composing
the various nations who practice it.
" The first dwellings of the most ancient inhabitants of the earth were
doubtless moveable huts or tents, in the manner of the modern Arabs and
Tartare. Uninstructed nature first demands personal clothing ; next, a
shelter from tlie perturbed elements ; then, a store for housed provisions,
clothing, and other necessaries against winter and inclement seasons. The
first demand will introduce mere drapery ; the second, a hut or cabin, at
first moveable, next stationary, then secure, and afterwards improved and
embeUished as security increased.
" Domestic architecture is a portion of the art which comes home to
every man's business and bosom. ' Every man's proper mansion-house
and home,' says Sir Henry Wotton, ' being the theatre of his liospitality,
the seat of self-fruition, the comfortablest part of his own life, the noblest
of his son's inheritance, a kind of private princedom, — nay, to the posses-
sors thereof, an epitome of the whole world, — may well deserve by these
attributes, according to the degree of tlie master, to be decently and de-
lightfully adorned.' It is, therefore, no mean part of the art, although it has
been seldom so much studied and cultivated as it deserves.
" The first buildings recorded both in the Bible and in the earliest historians
are of the simplest forms, materials, and design, and only fitted to keep the
humble-minded inhabitants from the severity of the weather. The primeval
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 61
dwelling was eitliei- a natural cavern, or the simplest contrivance against the
asperity of the weathei-.
" The Egyptians are among the first who built solidly and well ; and
their domestic arcliitecture, as displayed in the palatial style, is described by
ancient writers as being magnificent, costly, and splendid.
" The earliest dwellings were originally simple huts or cabins to protect
the inhabitants from the weather ; who then began to coalesce into cities,
hamlets, and other congregations, for safety and association. The wall and
gates next succeeded ; and security giving birth to luxury, added to the
single living or sleeping-room a second and a third, as the wants and the
refinements of the inhabitants required. The separation of the elder from
the younger, the males from the females, the married from the single, and
other necessary consequences of an increase of civihzaticn and refinement,
all added to the increase in size and improved convenience of the primeval
dwelling. These are the origins of the parlour, the eating-room, the kitchen,
the chamber, and the hall.
" More solid materials, more elegance, more convenience, were soon added
to the original cabin, as men advanced in refinement and civilization, and
became more convinced of security, and felt the desire of possessing their
own, their private home.
" Egypt is undoubtedly the first country where stone was used in domestic
architecture, unless, perhaps, Babylon may be considered its rival, either
chronologically or in splendour. Egypt abounded more in stone than in
timber, and its inhabitants have proved themselves to be among the ablest
workers in that material which the world has ever produced.
" Of the early and private domestic architecture of the Egyptians, we have
not many or sure grounds; but their immense palaces or congeries of palaces,
called the Labyrintli, which the Greeks imitated in their no less celebrated
Labyrinth at Crete, by Daedalus, proves them to have advanced in the pala-
tial style of domestic architecture to as great a perfection of splendour as
they had in the sacred styles.
'* It has been doubled whether any ruins of this wonderful structure have
ever been discovered ; but Captain Wilford, an enterprising searcher into
antiquities, asserts, in a very able paper in the Asiatic Researches, that its
ruins are still to be seen near the Lake Moeris. at a place which the Arabs
have named the Kasi, or Palace of Karan, whom they suppose to have been
the richest of mortals. We must, however, rely upoji the credit of ancient
authors for an account of it ; and the authority of Herodotus is undoubtedly
the best we can refer to on this head. There is great diversity of opinion
upon the exact period to which this much boasted edifice should be assigned.
62 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
Herodotus (lib. ii., n. 148) attributes its construction to the twelve kings who
reigned in Egypt at the same time, about six hundred and eighty years
before the Christian era. Poniponius Mela agrees in most points with Hero-
dotus ; and from these two authors we may gather a tolerably clear idea of
this great example of the palatial domestic architecture of Egypt.
" Herodotus, who had visited and examined this edifice with great atten-
tion, affirms that it surpassed every thing that he had conceived of it.
Within one and the same circuit of walls, it contained twelve magnificenl
palaces, regularly disposed, and communicating with each other. Each of
these palaces contained three thousand halls, twelve of which were of a
particular form and beauty. Half of these halls or chambers were inter-
spersed with terraces, and were arranged round the twelve principal halls,
communicating with each other, but by so many turns and windings, that,
without an experienced guide, it was impossible to escape wandering ; the
other half were underground, cut out of the rock, and were said to have been
used for the sepulchre of their kings Herodotus assures us, that he visited
all the apartments above ground ; but those which were subterraneous, they
would not, from motives of superstition, permit him to enter. Captain Wil-
ford thinks that the various apartments under ground had been used for
depositing the chests or coffins of the sacred crocodiles, called Sukhus or
Sukkis in old Egyptian, and Soukh to this day in the Coptic or vernacular
language of Egypt. The halls had an equal number of doors, six opening
to the norih, and six to the south ; and at each angle of the external walls
of this labyrinth was erected an immense pyramid for the sepulchres of its
founders. The whole of the labyrinth, walls, floors, and ceilings, were of
white marble, and exhibited a profusion of sculpture. Each of the before
mentioned twelve halls, or galleries, were supported on columns of the same
sort of marble. This splendid palace, or rather city of palaces, is also men-
tioned by Diodorus Siculus, who thinks it was a magnificent cemetry for
the Egyptian monarchs and their families ; and it is also described by Strabo
and Pliny, who confirm the accounts and descriptions of Herodotus.
" Among other splendid examples of the palatial style of domestic archi-
tecture of this wonder-working people, are the magnificent palace of Memnon,
in the Thebais, or Upper Egypt, which, according to Strabo, stood in the
splendid city of Abydus, the second in Egypt after Thebes ; and the cele-
brated palace of the Ptolemies, under whom the national style of architecture
experienced a complete change, and aimed at the superior graces of the
Greek style.
" The vast and splendid city of Thebes is celebrated by ancient writers
for the beauty and splendour of its domestic architecture, as well as for its
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. C3
great perfection in sacreil, monumental, and defensive architecture. This
style, domestic art, must have arrived to a higli degree of perfection among
the Thebans ; for Diodorus says, that the houses of the private citizens in
Tiiebes were of four and five stories in height; which proves their know-
ledge of floors, stairs, and the other necessary mechanism of storied buildings.
Of an antiquity nearly as remote as these splendid examples of the Egyptian
kings is the celebrated palace of Solomon, who proposed to construct the
most magnificent temple and the most splendid palace that had yet been seen.
AlthougTi a very able contemporary, (Mr. Willuns) has endeavoured to con-
vert the temple of Solomon to a Grecian temple of the pure Doric order,
there can be no question that the style of architecture, both of the temple
and of the palace of Solomon, was strictly Egyptian in every particular but
in its materials. The ancient historian who records the chronicles of the
Jewish kings assures us, that Phoenicia produced the most skilful artizans
in wood, or as our translation renders it, hewers of wood ; and were probably
skilful carpenters, joiners, carvers, and such like. A supply of these able
workmen and materials of all descriptions were sent from Tyre to Jerusalem
to build this palace, which was also designed by Pha?nician or Tyrian archi-
tects. In corroboration of the opinion that the style of the architecture of this
palace was the same as the Egyptian, it should be remembered that Solomon
married the king of Egypt's daughter, and built it for her accommodation,
and in her honour. The artists of Phcenicia were then the most skilful of
their day ; and much of the work was executed in their own country, and
sent over to Judea for constructing these edifices. The palace was thirteen
years (1 Kings, vii.) in building, and is described to have been built of hewn
stones, of beams, and of columns of cedar wood, with spacious windows,
porticoes, and porches. In one of which he constructed a lofty throne,
whereon he sat to administer justice to the people. The description of this
magnificent palace, and of the columns of wrought and cast brass, executed
by Hiram, the architect, in the first book of Kings, is worth referring to, in
corroboration of the perfection to which domestic architecture, and, in fact,
all the other arts, had reached in this period of ancient history.
" In these early ages, as well as those so beautifully described in Homer,
the patriarchal form of government was so prevalent, that the palaces of
princes were used for every ordinary public use, and they seem to have been
the only buildings dedicated to public purposes. The royal palace of Troy
is described by Homer as very spacious ; the material, stone, artfully wrought ;
the apartments numerous. But we have no accounts of the detail.
" The walls of Troy are celebrated as having been the works of gods ;
whicli fable proves nothing but that neither the Greeks nor the Trojans of
64 A RC HI TECT URAL HISTORY.
those days excelled in such works, which had hcen raised, like the temple
and palace of Solomon, by foreign artists. The Israelites before Solomon,
and the Greeks in Homer's time, seem to have made about ecjual progress
in domestic architecture.
"Among various ancient specimens of domestic architecture of Eastern
nations, is the ruins of the beautiful stone building at Delhi, called the Shi-
kargah, or hunting palace, of Feeroz Shah. The lofty pillar of a single
stone upon its summit, is called the lot, or walking staff", of the same mon-
arch. From a translation made by Colonel Follien of ils inscriptions, it would
appear as old as the year 97 of the Christian era ; but from another version,
made by Mr. Henry Colebrooke, — who is celebrated as a Sanscrit scholar for
his translation of the digest of the Hindu law, compiled under the superin-
tendence of Sir William Jones,— it is made much later (1164.) One date
may, however, refer to the pillar, and the other to the building.
" The Feeroz Shah, whose name is attached to the building, which is ac-
knowledged to be a very ancient Hindu monument, appears fioni Ferishtuh's
history to have reigned at Delhi between the years 13.51 and 13S8, in the
last of which he died, at the age of ninety ; and this historian, according to
his translator Colonel Dow, gives him the following character : that ' though
no great warrior in the field, he was by his excellent qualities well calculated
for a reign of peace.' He reigned thirty-eight years and nine months, and
left many memorials of his magnificence in the land. He built fifty great
sluices, forty mosques, thirty schools, twenty caravauseras, a hundred palaces,
five hospitals, a hundred tombs, ten baths, ten spires, one hundred and fifty
wells or public fountains, a hundred bridges, and the pleasure gardens he
made were without number.
"Mohammed Ameen Rasee, a native historian, who wrote a history of
the world in the reign of Akbar, affirms that this palace was a hunting-place
of Feeroz Shah. It is a building of three stories, in the centre of which is a
column of red stone of a single piece, round which are engraved several
inscriptions of a character which has hitherto remained undeciphered. The
historian says only one-third of this column is visible, and tliat the remaining
two-thirds are concealed by the ruins. Its length, or rather height, above
the roof is thirty-seven feet, and its circumference, as measured by Captain
Hoare's moonshee, Mohammed Morad, ten feet four inches ; some authors
say that the column is a monument of renown to the rajahs or princes of
Hindustan, and that Feeroz Shah erected the building on which it stands
for a menagerie and aviary, as an atonement for the severities which he
practised on the inhabitants of Cumassa. It is a beautiful remain of an-
cient Hindu domestic architecture, and is agreeably varied in its several stories
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 65
for effect of light and shade. When perfect, with its verandas and porticoe.-s,
it must liave presented a very graceful and elegant appearance. Other
specimens of the domestic architecture of this people are the palace of
Gazipoor, Oude, &c., &c.
" The Phcenician artists who executed the palace and temple of Solomon
are generally supposed to be those descendants of Noah who settled on the
coast of Palestine, and are the same people who are spoken of in the Old
Testament as Canaanites, a word signifying merchants, and were after-
wards called by the Greeks Phoenician. Sidon, their capital, so often spoken
of by Homer, which was afterwards eclipsed by its own colony Tyre, was
founded by Sidon the eldest son of Canaan. Inhabiting a barren coun-
try, they applied themselves to commeice and the arts, and were distin-
guislied for their excellence in manufactures and works of taste. Their
first settlements were in the isles of Cyprus and Khodes, and they passed
successively into Greece, Sicily, and Sardinia, afterwards into Gaul ; and,
always advancing, discovered the southern and western coasts of Spain,
and lastly Britain. It is even thought that the isles of Cassiterides,
whence they obtained their tin, were the Solingues and part of Cornwall.
Of their beautiful city Tyre the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth chap-
ters of Ezekiel give a grand and poetical description : describing it as of per-
fect beauty, situate in the midst of the sea. Its public and private build-
higs and fortifications were of great extent : ' the men of Arvad with
thine army,' says the writer, ' were upon thy walls, and the Gammadims
were in thy towers ; they hanged their shields upon thy walls round about.'
The whole of the two chapters are worthy of reference for their striking
descriptions.
'• The Phcenicians built several cities distinguished for the magnificence
of their domestic architecture, their wealth, manufactures, and extended
commerce. Among the principal were Joppa, Damascus, and Baalbec.
Herodotus mentions among other celeljrated Phaniician structures a splen-
did temple dedicated to Hercules, at Tyre ; and Hiram, king of Tyre,
the friend and ally of Solomon and the patron of Hiram the great archi-
tect, is mentioned as the founder of many palaces and cities.
" It is probable that the style of Phoenician architecture differed from
that of other contemporary nations, as Strabo, in speaking of Tyrus and
Aradus, two islands in the Persian Gulf, says they had temples and other
structures resembling those of the Phoenicians.
" It has been conjectured, and with much probability, that the Phoenician
architects constructed the principal part of their edifices with timber, as
Mount Lebanus supplied them with great quantities, and its cedar is much
9
56 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
celebrated • and, from what we can learn of the construction of the pa-
laces and other buildings of Solomon by Plioenician architects and work-
men, much timber was used in its erection.
" Of the domestic architecture of tlie Chinese both ancient and modern,
for tliey scarcely difl'er, little need be said. Tents and pavilions were the
orio-inal types of its style, and appear to have served as models of design
to this extraordinary people. From this origin arises its essential charac-
ter lio-htness ; and its essential defects, weakness and Imd taste. The ma-
terials principally used by the Chinese, are wood of different sorts, bricks
and tiles burned in the sun. Marble and stone are not often used, which
may perhaps be attributed to their climate. The heat and humidity of
the southren provinces render it extremely unhealthy to reside in houses
built of stone; and, according to the missionaries who were at Pekin,
they would, in the northein provinces, be uninhabitable for more than
half the year. The general style of Chinese architecture cannot but be
familiar to any one who has ever drunk from a China tea-cup, or who
lias seen many of the signs of our grocers' shops, Sir William Chamber's
pagoda in Kew Gardens, or the Pavilion at Brighton.
" The Chinese are governed more by the laws of their police than by
either theory or good taste in their domestic architecture. These laws
prescribe with the greatest accuracy how the Ion, or palace, should be
buUt of a prince of the first, second, or third order of the imperial family,
of a grandee of the empire, or of a mandarine ; and they regulate, like
our building act of parliament, the public edifices of the capital, and of
provincial edifices, cities, and towns, according to their several ranks or
grades in the empire. According to these laws, which are said to be
very ancient, the number of courts, the dimensions of the terraces, the
length of the buildings, and the height of the roofs, are ordered, by pro-
gressive degrees of increase, from the simple citizen to the man of letters,
from the man of letters to the mandarine, from the mandarine to the
prince, and from the prince to the emperor himself.
"All these measurements are fixed to within a few inches, and these
laws have of course produced a uniformity in the houses of individuals ;
and, after the gradation prescribed among all buildings, it is not astonish-
ing that the common houses are but merely huts of a single floor : but
the climate may also prevent them from building many stories. Their
plan is also as uniform as their elevation ; more than half the ground-
floor is occupied by courts and passages. The fronts of Chinese dwelling-
houses next the street have no windows, except when the building is
used for a shop. There is but one opening, namely, the door, before
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY. 67
which they hang a mat or place a screen, to prevent the passers-by from
looking in. The form of the Chinese roof is characteristic of their style,
always producing the idea of the tent, or pavilion as the primeval type of
their architecture.
" In the domestic architecture of the Chinese are often found doors of a
circular form at the top, approaching somewhat to the idea of the arch,
but resembling more the door of a bird cage than that of the entrance of
a dwelling-house. The palaces of China, especially those of the emperor,
are distinguished by their vast extent, by the numljer of large courts,
turnings, galleries, porticoes, halls, »fec., of which they are composed.
" Some of their public buildings are of a more substantial and durable
nature than their domestic architecture ; but there is nothing in their style —
even after attentively perusing the best European Chinese critic and archi-
tect, Sir William Chambers, and inspecting the best designs both executed
and on paper — to commend either on the score of propriety, beauty, or good
taste.
" The domestic architecture of the Greeks cannot be accurately ascertain-
ed ; but that of the Romans can be well gathered from some of their ruins,
and the relations of their authors. The palaces and dwelling-houses of the
ancient Romans were in a profuse style of grandeur and superb decoration.
Their villas, baths, and town-houses were of vast extent, and embraced
every luxury that domestic architecture could demand, aided by painting,
sculpture, and all the arts of design and decoration.
" Among their most splendid and costly examples of domestic architecture
were their baths, their theatres, and their amphitheatres. In the latter de-
scription of building they aimed so much at prodigality that the relations of
their most authentic writers almost appear fabulous ; as the account of the
temporary theatre of Marcus Scaurus, erected while he was edile, which he
embellished with three hundred and sixty marble columns and three thou-
sand bronze statues. It was capable of holding eighty thousand persons.
The shafts of the lower range of columns were thirty-eight feet long, and
their weight so great that Scaurus was obliged to give security for the repara-
tion of the great sewers over which they were to pass, if they should be
damaged by their conveyance ; and this, we should remember, was only for
an occasional temporary amusement.
" Such also in character was the timber edifice erected by Curio for the
celebration of the funeral games in honor of his father ; which was so con-
trived as to form, according to the nature of the exhibition, either a theatre or
an amphitheatre. When to be used in the former manner, the circular backs
were placed against each other, thus becoming two separate theatres ; so
68 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY.
that the declamations, music, and applauding acclamations of the one were
not heard in the other. After the theatrical performances were concluded,
the two edifices, turning on pivots, were rolled round by machinery, with all
the audience within them, and the circle or ainphitheatre was completed :
tlie pit, cleared of the populace, forming the arena.
<' The splendour of the baths of tiie Romans was equal to their other
structures. Ammianus Marcelhnus describes them of immense size. Some
idea of their splendour may be gathered from the ruins of the baths of Titus,
and from the Pantheon ; which Cameron, in his dissertation on the baths of
the ancients, says was only a vestibule to the vast and magnificent baths of
Agrippa, who is the reputed founder of its fine portico.
" Before the introduction of pure taste and the importation of Grecian arts
and artists into Rome, we have the authority of all historians to prove that
its arcliitecture was as rude as that of any people of antiquity. Their Etrus-
can neighbours led them to copy Greek originals ; and one of their earliest
kings, Tarquinius Prisciis, was a native of Greece; hence the origin of the
Roman style. Nor was it the architecture of Greece alone that the Romans
imitated ; but also their hterature, their eloquence, their manners and cus^
toms, were-all borrowed from their illustrious predecessors. Vitruvius found-
ed his code of architectural laws upon those of the Greeks ; Virgil imitated
Homer; Cicero, Demosthenes; the early Roman plays were translations
from the Greek, and their later ones imitations.
" The elements, or constituent parts of Roman architecture, like those of
the Grecian, are the orders ; which consist in the style now before us of five,
as the Grecian does of three ; and are named the Tuscan, the Dork, the
Jonic, the Corinthian, and the Composite."
GLOSSARY
NAMES AND TERMS USED IN ARCHITECTURE.*
[from the encyclopedia BRITANNICA SEVENTH EDITION.]
Abaciscus (diminutive of Abacus, q. ».).
This term is applied to the cliequers or
squares of a tessellated pavement.
Abacus (Gr. a/Saf, a square tile or table). The
rectangular and equilateral tablet covering
the ovalo of the capital of the Doric column,
and on which the superimposed entablature
rests, is called the abacus ; and from it
the similar part (though differently shaped)
of all capitals is distinguished by the same
term. Abacus means the same thing, but
is opposed in application to Plinth.
AcROTERiuM (Gr. «K|wT»5nt;, the summit or
vertex), a statue or ornament of any kind
placed on the apex of a pediment. The
term is often incorrectly restricted to the
plinth, which forms the podium merely
for the acroterium. The statue of the saint
on the apex of the pediment of the west-
ern front of St. Paul's is an acroterium ;
the other statues may be called acroteral
figures.
AupHiPRosTTLE (Gr. ctM^/, arouud or about,
and prostyle, q. v.) A temple with a porti-
co at each end is said to be an amphi-
prostyle. This term would be more correctly
applied to a structure having projecting
porticoes on all its sides, especially if it be
equilateral like the Bourse or Exchange at
Paris, allowing no distinction of flanks or
wings to make it peripteral.
A.VNULET (Lat. annulus, a ring). This term
is applied to the small fillets or bands
which encircle the lower part of the Doric
capital immediately above the neck or tra-
chelium.
AnTjE (probably from the Gr. avrm, or some
other compound of the preposition uvrt, for,
or opposite to; it has no singular), the pier-
formed ends of the walls of a building, as
in the portico of a Greek temple. A por-
tico is said to be in antis when columns
stand between antas, as in the temple of
Theseus, supposing the peristyle or sur-
rounding columns removed.
Antefix.e (Lat. ante, before, and_^j:us, fixed),
upright blocks with an ornamented face
placed at regular intervals on a cornice,
AntefixK were originally adapted to close
and hide the lower ends of the joints of the
covering tiles on the roof of a temple.
ApophIi'ge (Gr. oLjro^uyti, a flying off), the low.
er part of the shaft of an Ionic or Corinthian
column, or the highest member of its base if
the column be considered as a whole. The
apophyge is the inverted cavetto or concave
sweep, on the upper edge of which the cylin-
drical shaft rests.
Apteral (Gr. a priv. and sttsjov, a wing), a
temple without columns on the flanks or
sides.
Ar.eostvle (Gr. ajaioc, rare or weak, and
a-Tuxii, a column), a wide intercolumniation.
The space assigned to this term is four dia-
meters.
Ar.eosystvle (compounded of arceostyle and
♦ Those marked thus t are either entirely, or almost entirely, peculiar to Pointed Architecture.
70
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
systi/lc, q. v.). This term is used to express
the arrangement attendant on coupled co-
hims, as in the western front of St. Paul's
Catliedral.
Arcade, a series of arches.
Arch (Lat. arcus, 3,how), a construction of
separate or distinct blocks or masses of any
liard material, cut wedge-wise, and arranged
in a howed form, so as to bear from end to
end horizontally, or across an opening,
though abutting or being supported only at
the ends.
Architrave (Gr. »§%», chief, and Lat. trabs, a
Iieam), the chief beam, — that part of the
entablature which rests immediately on the
heads of the columns, and is surmounted by
the frieze ; it is also called the epistylium or
epistyle. The moulded enrichment on the
sides and head of a door or window is called
an architrave.
Arciiivolt. This term is a contraction of the
Italian architrave vollato. It is applied to
the architrave moulding on the face of asi
arch, and following its contour.
Arris, the sharp edge or angle in which two
sides or surfaces meet.
Astragal (Gr. sts-rg^t^st^&f, a vertebral joints, a
conve.x moulding. This term is generally
applied to small mouldings, and (torus to
large ones of the same form. (See torus.)
Attic, a low story above an entablature, or
above a cornice which limits the height of
the main part of an elevation. The etymo-
logy of this term is unsettled : probably the
upper range of columns in a Greek hypiE-
thral temple was called a-reip^ov, from hav-
ing no coherent wall ; whence the Latin
atticum, and its application to a story super-
imposing the general ordinance. Other-
wise such a thing is unknown in Greek
architecture ; but it is very common in both
Roman and Italian practice. What is here
termed the tholobate in St. Peter's and St.
Paul's cathedrals are generally termed
attics.
Baluster, a small column or pier supporting
the coping in a pierced parapet : the para-
pet itself, when pierced, is hence called a
balustrade.
Band or T.enia, nearly synonymous with Fd-
let, q. 1). This term is, however, most ge-
nerally applied to that listel in the Doric
entablature which separates the frieze from
the architrave, and connects the lower parts
of the triglyphs.
Base (Gr. fiitrt;, from tlie verb to bear). The
congeries of mouldings generally placed
under the shaft of an Ionic or Corinthian
column is called its base. The term is ap-
plied also to the lowest part of a pedestal
or stylobate ; to the vertical moulded fit-
tings wliich go round walls on the floor ;
and generally to every thing that is put
lowest, for any thing to rest on.
Batter (Fr. battre, XoheaX). Building over
in projecting courses, like inverted steps,
is termed battering, beating, or corbelling
over.
t Battlement, a pierced or machicolatcd
parapet.
t Bay. The space between the mullions of a
window, between piers, and between the
principal beams of a roof, floor, or ceiling,
is a bay.
Bead, a small cylindrical moulding of fre-
quent use.
Bed-mould, the congeries of mouldings which
is under the projecting part of almost every
cornice, and of which indeed it is a part.
Blocking-course, a deep but slightly project-
ing course in an elevation, to act as cornice
to an arcade, or to separate a basement
from a superior story. (See String-course.)
t Boss, a sculptured knob which is placed on
the intersections of ribs in groined ceilings.
+ Buttre.ss, the projected piers against the
angles of towers, and against the ordinary
piers of walls, to strengthen them, and re-
ceive the outward thrust of the inner trans-
verse arches.
Cabling. The flutes of columns are said to
be cabled v hen they are partly occupied by
solid convex masses, or appear to be refilled
with cylinders after they had been formed.
t Canopy, a covering or hood, the enriched
projecting head to a niche or tabernacle.
The tablet cr drip-stone, whether straight or
circular, over the heads of doors or windows,
if enriched, is called a canopy.
Capital, Cap (Gr. xi^hm, the head), the spread-
ing, moulded, voluted, foliate, or otherwise
enriched head of a column. The term cap
is applied, in contradistinction, to the con-
geries of mouldings which forms the head
of a pier or pilaster.
Caryatides. Human female figures used
aa piers, columns, or supports, are called
Caryatides; and, adjectively, Caryatic is
applied to the human figure generally, when
used in the manner of Caryatides.
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
71
Cassoon, (Ilal.), a deep panel or coffer in a
soffit or ceiling, this term is often written
after the French caisson, whereas we derive
it directly from the Italian cassone, the aug.
mentalive of cassa, a chest or coffer.
Cathetus (Gr. xtOsToc, a perpendicular line).
The eye of the volute is so termed because
its position is determined, in an Ionic or
voluted capital, by a line let down from the
point in which the volute generates.
Cauliculus (Lat. a stalk or stem), tlie inner
scrolls or tendrils of the Corinthian capital
are called CauUculi. It is not uncommon,
however, to apply this term to the larger
scrolls or volutes of the same also.
Cavetto (Ital. casare, todig out), a moulding
whose form is a simple concave, and im.
pending.
Cella (Lat.), the cell or interior of a Cleithral
temple. The Greek term is Naos.
Chamfer. An edge or arris taken off equally
on the two sides which form it, leaves what
is called a chamfer, or a chamfered edge. If
the arris be taken off more on the one side
than the other, it is said to be splayed or
bevelled.
t CiNQUEFoiL, tracery in five foliations or
featherings.
Cleithral (vide Cleithros.) This is used of
a covered Greek temple, in contradistinction
to HypfBthral, which designates one that is
uncovered.
Cleithros (Gr. it.\s/''|(;c, an inclosed or shut up
place). A temple whose roof completely
covers it is a Cleithros.
Coffer, a deep panel in a ceiling.
Column (Lat. columna), a tapering cylindrical
mass, placed vertically on a level stylobate,
in some cases with a spreading congeries of
mouldings called a base, and having always
at its upper and smaller end a dilating mass
called a capital. Columns are either insu-
lated or attached. They are said to be
attached or engaged when they form part of
a wall, projecting one half or more, but not
the whole of their substance.
Co.xsoL or Console, a bracket or truss, gene-
rally with scrolls, or volutes, at the two ends,
of unequal size and contrasted, but connected
by a flowing line fro;n the back of the upper
one to the inner convolving face of the
lower.
Coping, the covering course or cornice of a
wall or parapet. The tenn coping is gene-
rally applied to a plain, slightly projected,
covering course, and cornice to a larger
moulded coping
t Corbel, a knob, boss, or consol, projecting
from a vertical face, to act as a prop or sup-
port. Its jutting or overhanging has in-
duced the application of the term to describe
the projection of one thing over another.
Cornice (Gr. if^mi;, the highest part, that
which is placed last on a building), the high,
est part of an entablature — that which rests
on the frieze. The term cornice is very ge-
nerally applied to any bold congeries of
moulding occupying the highest place in a
composition, whether external or internal.
A plain covering to a wall or parapet is
called a coping q. i'.
Corona {vide Cornice). This term is applied
to the deep verticle face of the projected part
of the cornice between the bed. mould and the
covering mouldings,
t Crocket (probably from the old Englisli
word crok, a curl), an ornament of foliage
or animals running up the back of a pedi-
ment, arch, pinnacle, or spire, from the cor-
bels below to the finial above, in which
latter the crockets on both sides appear to
merge. In the earlier examples the crocket
is a mere curl, or bent tendril, with an en-
riched end.
Cupola (Ital. cupo, concave, profound), a
spherical or spheroidal covering to a build-
ing, or to any part of it.
t Cusp (Lat. cuspis, a spear), the points in
which the foliations of tracery finish. These
are sometimes themselves enriched, and are
sometimes plain.
Cyclostylar (Gr. kukao;, a circle, and, (TTyxoc,
a column). A structure composed of a
circular range of columns without a core
is cyclostylar; for wilh a core, the range
would be a peristyle. This is the species of
edifice falsely called by Vitruvius Monopte-
ral. (See Monopteros.)
Cyma {Gr.xufia. a wave), the name of a mould,
ing of very frequent use. It is a simple,
waved line, concave at one end and convex
at the other, like an Italic/. In that man-
ner it is called a cyma-recta ; but if the con-
vexity appear above, and the concavity below
on the right hand, it is then a cyma-re-
versa.
CvRTOSTVLE (Gr. Ku^Tn;, convex, and d-tuxoc,
a column), a circular projecting portico.
Dado or Die, the vertical face of an insulated
pedestal, between the base and cornice or
surbase. It is extended also to the similar
part of all stereobates which are arranged like
pedestals in Roman and Italian architecture.
72
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
Decastyle (Gr. rSixi, ten, and o-tu>,oc, a col-
umn), a portico of ten columns in front. (See
note to the term He.iastyle.) The portico
to the London University is of this descrip.
tion ; more particularly doscribed, it is dcca-
prostylc and reces?cd.
Dentil (Lat. dens, a tooth). The cogged or
toothed member, so common in the bed-
mould of a Corinthian entablature, is said
to be Dcntilled ; and each cog or tooth is
called a dentil.
Design. Architects apply this term to what is
vulgarly called a plan, intending by it the
scheme or design of a building in all its
parts, the term plan liaving a distinct appli-
cation to a technical portion of the design.
(See Plan.) The plans, elevations, sec-
tions, and whatever other drawings may be
necessary for an edifice, exhibit the design.
Detail, As used by architects, detail means
the smaller parts into which a composition
may be divided. It is applied generally to
mouldings and other enrichments, and again
to their minutite.
Diameter (superior and inferior). The greater
diameter of the shaft of a column is tech-
nically termed its inferior, because it is that
of the lower end ; and the lesser, that of the
upper end, its superior diameter.
DiASTVLE (Gr. <r<i, through, and tr-niKu, a co-
lumn), a spacious intcrcolumniatiun, to
which three diameters arc assigned. {Vide
EUSTVLE.)
Dipteral. (See Dipteros.)
DiPTEUos (Gr. <f«, twice and ^Tigov, a wing),
a double winged temple. The Greeks arc said
to have constructed temples with two ranges
of columns all round, which were called
Dipteroi. A portico projecting two co.
lumns and their interspaces is of dipteral or
pseudo-dipteral arrangement.
DisTYLE(Gr. Jis, twice, and a-rvho!, a column),
a portico of two columns. This term is not
generally applied to the mere porch with two
columns, but to describe a portico with two
columns in antis. The elevation of the
pronaos of the he.xastyle peripteral temple
exhibits an example of distyle in antis.
DiTRiGLVPH (Gr. Jk, twice, and triglyph, q. v.),
an intereolumniation in tlic Doric order, of
tw'o triglyphs. (See Monotriglyph.)
DoDECASTYLE (Gr. J'xfiKi, twclve, and a-ru\ot,
a column), a portico of twelve columns in
front.
Dome (Gr. Ja^ft^, a structure of any kind ;
whence the Latin domus, a house or temple),
a cupola or inverted cup on a building. The
appliration of this term to its generally rc-
. ccivcd purpose is from the Italian custom of
calling an archiepiscopal church, by way of
eminence, // duomo, the temple ; for to one
of that rank, the cathedral of Florence, the
cupola was first applied in modern practice.
The Italians themselves never call a cupola
a dome : it is on this side the Alps the mis-
take has arisen, from the circumstance, it
would appear, that the Italians use the term
with reference to those structures whose
most distinguishing feature is the cupola,
tholus, (or as we now call it) dome. (See
Cupola.)
t Dripstone, the moulding or cornice which
acts as a canopy to doors and windows.
Horizontal running mouldings arc some,
times called tablets and soinctimcs drip-
stones.
Drops. (Sec Gutt.ts).
Echinus (Gr. ex"°'' ^" '^SS)' * moulding of
eccentric curve, which (when it is carved)
being generally cut into the forms of eggs
and anchors alternating, the moulding is
called by the name of the more conspicuous.
It is the same as Ovale, q. v.
Elevation, the front, or facade as the French
term it, of a structure. A geometrical draw,
ing of the external upriglit parts of a build-
ing. Architects speak of front, back-front,
and side or end elevations.
Entablature or Lntadlature (Lat. in, upon,
and tabula a tablet). The superimposed
horizontal mass in a columnar ordinance,
which rests upon the tablet or abacus of a
column, is so called. It is conventionally
composed of three parts, architrave, frieze,
and cornice.
Entasis Gr. ivr^ifi;, a stretching or swelling).
Columns are said to have entasis when they
do not diminish regularly, but in a curved
line.
Epistylium or Epistyle (Gr. sot, upon, and
a"Tywc, a column). This term may with
propriety be applied to the whole entablature,
with which it is synonymous ; but it is re-
stricted in use to the architrave or lowest
member of the entablature.
Escape, a term sometimes used for the apo-
phyge of a column. (See Apopiiyge.)
Euystyle (Gr. iu, well, and o-ti/ao?, a column),
a species of intereolumniation, to which a
proportion of two diameters and a quarter is
assigned. Tills term, together with the
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
73
others of similar import, — pycnostyle, sy-
style, diastylo, and aracostyle, referring to
tile distances of coliiiTins from one anotiicr
in composition, is from Vitruvius, who as.
signs to each tlie space it is to express. It
will be seen, however, by reference to them
individually, that the words themselves,
though perhaps sufficiently applicable, con-
vey no idea of an exactly defined space,
and by reference to the columnar structures
of the ancients, that no attention was paid
by them to such limitations. It follows,
then, that the proportions assigned to each
are purely conventional, and may or may
not be attended to without vitiating the pow-
er of applying the terms. Eustyle moans
the best or most beautiful arrangement ; but
as the effect of a columnar composition de-
pends on many things besides the diameter of
the columns, the same proportioned interco-
lumniation would look well or ill, accord-
ing to those other circumstances ; so that
the limitation of eustyle to two diameters
and a quarter is absurd, and so it is in the
case of the other similar terms. With
Doric intercolumniation it is different, as
may be seen by reference to the word
MoNOTBIGLYPH.
Facade. (See Elevation.)
Fascia (Lat. a band). The narrow vertical
bands or broad fillets into which the archi-
traves of Corinthian and Ionic entablatures
arc divided, are called fascia? or fascias ;
and the term is generally applied to any
similar member in architecture.
t Featherings. (See Foliations.)
Fillet, a narrow vertical band or listel, of
frequent use in congeries of mouldings, to
separate and combine them, and also to give
breadth and firmness to the upper edge of a
crowning cyma or cavetto, as in an external
cornice. The narrow slips or breadths be-
tween the flutes of Corinthian and Ionic
columns are also called fillets.
t FiNiAL (Lat. /nis, the end.) This term is
equivalent to the Greek Aeroterium. It is
applied to the carved ape.x of pediments,
piers, pinnacles, and canopies.
Flute, a concave channel. Columns whose
shafi,s are cliannelled are said to be fluted,
and the flutes are collectively called flutings.
t Foliations or Featiiehinqs, small arches
meeting in points or cusps, which are plain
or enriched. Tlicy are used as an enrich-
ment in tracery, and are distinguished as
10
trefoils, quatrefoils, and cinquefoils, as the
case may be.
Frieze (lldil. frcgio, from the ha.t. phrygio.
nius, enriched or embroidered), that portion
of an entablature between the cornice above
and the architrave below. It derives its
name from being the recipient of the sculp-
tured enrichments either of foliage or fio-urea
which may be relevant to the object of the
structure. The frieze is also called the
zoophorus.
Frontispiece, the front or principal elevation
of a structure. This term, however, is ge-
nerally restricted in application to a deco-
rated entrance.
Gable. When a roof is not hipped or returned
on itself at the ends, its ends are stopped by
carrying up the walls under them in the tri-
angular form of the roof itself. This is
called the gable, or indeed, the pediment.
The latter term, .however, is restricted to
the ornamental and ornamented gable ; and
gable itself is applied to a plain triangular
end.
GuADiNO (Ital. dim. of g-ro&s, a step). Ar-
chitects frequently used the plural of this
term, gradini, and to gradinate, instead of
the English, steps, and to graduate, perhaps
without sufficient reason, though they find
them useful to distinguish what they intend
from the meaning of the latter words in
their ordinary acceptation.
Groining. In vaulting or arching over from
insulated piers, the cross vaults meet in
angles, and lead to a common centre or aj>ex.
This is called groining.
GuiLocHE or Guji.ocHos (Gr. yvicv, a member,
M'}(p;, a snare). An interlaced ornament
like network, used most frequently to enrich
the torus.
GuTT.E (Lat. drops). The small cylindrical
drops used to enrich the mutules and reguliB
of the Doric entablature are so called.
Helix (Gr. i\i^, a wreath or ringlet), used
synonymously with Cauliculus, q. v. It
forms in the plural Helices.
Hemiglyph (Gr. ufxKT-u;, half, and jm/<})», an in.
eisiou or channel). The half-channels, or
rather chamfered edges, of a triglyph tablet,
may be so called. The two hcmiglyphs are
included to make the third channel, and com-
plete the triglyph. (See Triglyph.)
IIexastvle (Gr. e£, six, and o-tuxoc, a column).
A portico of six columns in front is of this
74
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
description. Most of tlie churches in Lon-
don which have porticoes have hexa-pro-
styles. (See Puostvle.)
Htp.'ethral. (See Hvp^thros.)
Hyp-ethros. (Gr. [Jsro, under, and ai9g», the
air), a temple open to the air, or uncoA'ered.
The Greeks frequently made the temples of
the supreme divinities hypjethral. For in-
stance, those of Jupiter Olympius at Agri-
gentum in Sicily, of Neptune at Passtum,
and of Minerva Parthenon at Athens, are
all of this description. The term may be
the more easily understood by supposing
the roof removed from over the nave of a
church in which columns or piers go up from
the floor to the ceiling, leaving the aisles still
covered. In that case it would be hypsethral,
after the manner of the Greek hyptethros.
The Pantheon in Rome having an opening
in the centre of the dome, is thereby rendered
hypoethral.
HvpoGEA (Gr. iJa-o, under, and yu, the earth).
Constructions under the surface of the earth,
or into the sides of a hill or mountain, are
hypogea.
HvroTRACiiELinM (Gr. i^o, upon, and T^ajraxoc,
the neck,) the part forming the junction of
the shaft with the capital of a column ; the
neck of the capital itself. In some styles it
is a projecting fillet or moulding, and in
others, as the Doric, it is composed of a
channel or groove, and sometijnes of more
than one.
Jamb, the side-post or lining of a door-way or
other aperture. The jambs of a window
outside the frame are called reveals.
IcHNOGRAPHY (Gr. ix'"!, ^ footstep or track,
and >5«<fii, a description or representation).
A plan or the representation of the site of
an object on a horizontal plane, is its ichno-
graphy. The term plan (q. v.) is, however,
much more frequently used than this.
Impost (Lat. impositus, laid upon). The ho-
rizontal congeries of mouldings forming the
capital of a pier, or edge pilaster, which has
to support one leg of an arch, is called the
impost ; sometimes, and more conveniently,
this term is used for the pilaster itself, when
its capital is called the impost cap or impost
mouldings.
Intercolumniation (Lat. inter, between, and
column, q. v.). The distance from column
to column, the clear space between columns,
is called the intercolumniation.
t Label, the level moulding or dripstone over
a door or window, common in the later
Pointed works. It is generally turned down
at the ends at right angles, and slightly re-
turned again horizontally and outwards.
Lacunar (Lat.), a panelled or coffered ceiling
or soffit. The panels or cassoons of a ceil-
ing are more classically called lacunaria.
+ Lantern (Lat. lanierna), a turret raised
above a roof or tower, and very much
pierced, the better to transmit light. In
modern practice this term is generally ap-
plied to any raised part in a roof or ceiling,
containing vertical windows, but covered in
horizontally.
Metope (Gr. /utro'jn, a middle space), the
square recess between tJie triglyphs in a
Doric frieze. It is sometimes occupied by
sculptures.
Mezzanine (Ital. mezzanino, dun. of mezzo,
the middle), a low story between two lofty
ones. It is called by the French entresol,
or inter-story.
MoDii-LioN (Lat. modulus, a measure of pro-
portion), so called because of its arrange-
ment in regulated distances ; the enriched
block or horizontal bracket generally found
under the cornice of the Corinthian enta-
blature. Less ornamented, it is sometimes
used in the Ionic. See also Mutule.
Module (Lat. modulus, u modus, a measure
or rule). This is a term which has been
generally used by architects in determining
the relative proportions of the various parts
of a columnar ordinance. The semidia-
meter of the column is the module, which
being divided into thirty parts called mi-
nutes, any part of the composition is said
to be of so many modules and minutes, or
minutes alone, in height, breadth, or projec-
tion. The whole diameter is now gene-
rally preferred as a modus, it being a better
rule of proportion than its half.
BIONOPTERAL. (SeC MoNOPTEROS.)
Monoptebos (Gr. /^ova;, one, or single, and
cTTf^oc, a wing). This term is incorrectly
used by Vitruvius to describe a temple com-
posed of a circular range of columns sup-
porting a tholus, cupola, or dome, but without
walls. (See Peripteral.) Such an edifice
would be more correctly designated as
Cyclostylar, }. ».
Mdnotriglyph (Gr. f^ova one, or single, and
triglyph. q. v.) The intercolumniations of
the Doric order are determined by the num-
ber of triglyphs which intervene, instead of
the number of diameters of the column, as
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
75
in other cases ; and tliis term designates the
ordinary intercolumniation of one triglyph.
Mouldings, eccentric curves of various kinds,
intended to enrich and ornament, by pro.
ducing light and shade, and obviating the
monotony attendant on many flat and ingu-
lar surfaces. Tliey may be variously carved
to increase their efficiency. The most usual
forms of mouldings are called the cyma-
recta and reversa, cavctto, scotia, torus,
astragal or bead, and the ecliinus or ovalo.
In Pointed architecture, mouldings are not
limited either to those names or to the forms
they are intended to designate, nor indeed is
any other style, except by absurd custom and
authority.
t MuLLioN, the columnar vertical bar used to
divide a window into breadths ; the trunk
out of which tracery flows.
MuTULE, (Lat. mututus, a stay or bracket,) the
rectangular impending blocks under the
corona of the Doric cornice, from v;hich
gutta; or drops depend. Mutule is equiva-
lent to modillion, but the latter term is ap-
plied more particularly to enriched blocks
or brackets, such as those of Ionic and
Corinthian entablatures,
Naos, (Gr. vxBt, a temple.) This term is some-
times used instead of the Latin CeUa, as
applied to the interior ; utrictly, howe rcr, it
means the body of the edifice itself, and not
merely its interior or cell.
Newel, the. solid or hollow column or cylinder
which bears up the handrail of a staircase
at the foot and in the most material parts.
It means also the core or hollow, as the case
may be, about which a circular staircase
winds.
Niche, a concave recess in a wall, \-.ith a
straight or single head. Niches are gene-
rally made to receive statues, vases, &c.
OcTASTYLE (Gr. oxTa', eight, and otuxih, a co.
lumn.) A portico of eight columns in front.
(See note to Hexastvle.) It may indeed be
called a pseudo-octa-prostylc. (See Pseudo-
prostyle.)
Ogee, the vulgar name for the Cyma, 7. v.
Opisthodomus (Gr. oTri^Siv behind, and /o^o?,
a house or other edifice,) the part behind a
Greek temple corresponding with tlio Pro-
naos before it. (See Pronaos.)
Order. A column with its entablature and
stylobate is so called. The term is the re-
sult of the dogmatic laws deduced from the
writings of Vitruvius, and has been exclu.
sively applied to tliose arrangements which
they were thought to warrant.
Ordinance, a composition of some particular
order or style. It need not, however, be
restricted to a columnar composition, for it
will apply to any species which is subjected
to conventional rules for its arrangement.
Orthography, (Gr. ogfloc, straight or true, and
jgitfs, a description or representation.) A
geometrical elevation of a building or other
object, in which it is represented as it ac-
tually exists, or may exist, and not perspec-
tively, or as it would appear, is called its
orthography.
Orthostyle, (Gr. 05S0C, straight or true, and
OTuyaf, a column,) any straight range of co-
lumns. This is a term suggested to desig-
nate what is generally but improperly called
a peristyle, q. v. ; that is, columns in a straight
row or range, but not forming a portico.
OvALO, (Ital.), egg-fonned (See Echinus.) This
is the name most commonly applied to the
moulding which appears to have originated
in the moulded head of the Doric column,
and, with an abacus, forming its capital.
Panel, a compartment with raised margins,
moulded or otherwise. Deep panels in a
ceiling are called Cassoons, and Lacunaria,
Parapet (Ital.) parapetto, against the breast, or
breast-high,) the low breast-high wall which
is used to front terraces and balconies, to
flank bridges, &.c. Tiie most common ap-
plication of the term in this country is to so
much of the external walls of a house as
stands above the level gutters of the roof
behind.
Pakastas (Gr. iragas-Txc, standing before.) an
antes or end pilaster. This is the Greek
term for which the latin antas is generally
used, and it has the same meaning. (See
Ant.e.)
Pedestal (Gr. Trnv;, a foot, and ot^/ai?, a co.
lumn.) An insulated stylobate is for the
most part so called. The term is, more-
over, generally applied to any parallelogra-
mic or cylindrical mass used as the base-
ment of any single object, as a statue or
vase.
Pediment, that part of a portico which rises
above its entablature to cover the end of
the roof, whose triangular form it takes.
The cornice of the entablature, or its corona
and part of the bed-mould only, with the
76
ARCIIITECTUKAL TERMS.
addition of a cyinatium, bounds its inclined
sides, and joins in an obtuse angle at the
apex. In Pointed Architecture, however,
tlie angle of a pediment is for the most part
acute,
t Pendent (Lat./)en(ie«s, hanging.) In some
of the later works of the Pointed style,
large masses depend from enriched ceilings,
and appear to be formed by the other legs
of intersecting arches : these are called
pendents. They also occur in canopies.
Periuolus (Gr. sj-t^j, around or about, and
fiihKce, to gird or throw around,) an inclo.
sure. Any inclosed space is a peribolus ;
but the term is applied more particularly to
the sacred inclosure about a temple. The
wall forming the inclosure is also called
the jicribolus.
Peripteral. (See Peripteros.)
Peripteros (Gr. mgi, around or about, and
TTTEgov, a wing.) A temple or other struc-
ture with the columns of its end, prostyles
or porticoes, returned on its sides or wings,
and one intercolumniation distant from the
walls. Almost all the Doric temples of the
Greeks were peripteral. Tlio term is, how-
ever, incorrectly applied by Vitruvius to
peristylar structures, thougli it is clear that
a perfectly round building, such as he de-
scribes to be peripteral, cannot be said to be
winged or to have wings.
Peristvler, having a Peristyle. (See Peri-
style.
PERisTrLE (Gr. 5rfj/, around or about, and
cTTyxsc, a coimun,; a range of columns en-
circling an edifice, such as that which sur-
rounds the cylindrical drum under the cu-
polaof St. Paul's. The columns ofa Greek
peripteral temple form a peristyle also, the
former being a circular and the latter a
quadrilateral peristyle. Tlie same terra is
generally but incorrectly applied to a range
of columns, in almost any situation, when
they do not form a portico. (See Ortho-
style.)
Pier. The solid parts of a wall between
windows, and between openings generally,
are called piers. The term is also applied
to masses of brick- work or masonry, which
are insulated to form supports to gates or to
carry arches.
Pilaster (Lat. pila, a pillar, and the Ital. aug-
mentative astro, which indicates an inferior
quality,) an inferior sort of column or pil-
lar ; a projection from or against a pier,
having the form and decorations of antse.
when used correctly ; but too frequently
they have capitals, like those of columns,
assigned them.
Pillar {hut. pila, anilla], piliere,) a columnar
mass of no particular form. Columns are
vulgarly called pillars ; but architects make
a distinction, restricting this term to such
pillars as do not come within the descrip.
tion of a column. (See Column.)
Pillowed. A swollen or rounded frieze is
said to be pillowed or pulvinated.
+ Pinnacle, the slender tapering headof a tur-
ret or buttress. A small spire, or the head
ofa spire or steeple.
Plan, a horizontal geometrical section of the
walls of a building ; or indications, on a
liorizontal plane, of the relative positions
of the walls and partitions, with the various
openings, such as windows and doors, — re.
cesses and projections, as chimneys and
chimney breasts, — columns, pilasters, &-c.
This term is often incorrectly used in the
sense of Design,
Planceer is sometimes used in the same sense
as soffit, but incorrectly, as it is from the
French plancher, to board or floor. It is
more particularly applied to the soffit of the
corona in a cornice.
Plinth (Gr. a-xivSof, a square tile.) In the
Roman orders the lowest member of the
base of a column is square and vertically
faced ; this is called a plinth.
Polytriglyph (Gr. tioxus, many, and triglyph,
q. V.) An intercolumniation in the Doric
order of more than two triglyphs. (See
MONOTKIGLYPH and DiTRIGLYPH.)
Portico (an Italicism of the Lat. Portions,) an
open space before the door or other entrance
to any building, fronted with columns. A
portico is distinguished as prostyle, or in
antis, as it may project from or recede with-
in the building, and is designated with either
of these terms by the number of columns its
front may consist of. (See Distyle, Tetra-
STYLE, HexASTYLE, OcTASTYLE, &C.
PoRTicus, (Lat. See Portico.) In an amphi.
prostylar or peripteral temple, this term is
used to distinguish the ]}ortico at the en.
trance from that behind, which is called the
posticum.
Posticuiu (Lat.) A portico behind a temple.
(See PoRTicus and Portico.)
Pronaos, (Gr. irgo, before, and vao s, a temple. )
The inner portico of a temple, or the space
between the porticus, or outer portico, and
the door opening into the coUa. This is a
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
77
conventional use of tlie tcrjn ; for, striclly,
the pronaos is tlie portico itself.
PropyljEcm (Gr. ^go, before, and iruW), a portal),
any structure or structures forming the en-
trance to the peribolus of a temple ; also the
space lying between the entrance and the
temple. In common usage this term, in the
plural (propylffia), is almost restricted to the
entrance to the Acropolis of Athene, which
is known by it as a name.
Prostyle (Gr. 5rgo before, and <r<ri/xoc, a co-
lumn). A portico in which the columns
project from the building to which it is
attached is calleil a prostyle. It is tautolo-
gous to say a prostyle portico, — a prostyle is
a portico. Custom, however, seems to war.
rant the impropriety, for the word portico is
always superadded. In determining the
number of columns of which a portico con-
sists, the Greek numerals are prefixed to the
term Style, q. v., and prostyle is repeated.
It would be more concise, and, at the least,
equally correct, to put the numeral before
prostyle, and say tetra-prostyle, lie.xa-pro-
style, &c. instead of tetrastvlc-prostyle, &c.
as the custom is ; that mode is adapted in
this article throughout.
PsEUDu-DiPTER.tL (Gr. 4»''>ic, false and dip.
teral, q. v. false double-winged. When the
inner row of columns of a dipteral arrange-
ment is omitted, and the space from the wall
of the building to the columns is preserved
of the consequent double projection, it is
jiseudo-dipteral. The portico of the Lon-
don University is pseudo-dipterally ar-
ranged, the returning columns on the ends
or sides not being carried through behind
those in front.
Pseudo-peripteral (Gr. ■^tuS'it;, false, and pe-
ripteral, q. v.), false-winged. A temple hav-
ing the columns on its flanks attached to the
walls, instead of being arranged as in a po-
ripteros, is said to be pseudo.peripteral.
Pseudo-prostyle (Gr. 4^'"'««. false, and pro-
style, q. v.). This is a term not in general
used, but is suggested to designate a portico
projecting less than the space from one co-
lumn to another, as the western porticoes to
St. Paul's cathedral, and the portico to the
East India House, in London ; but that they
are recessed also, and therefore may be de-
scribed as pseudo-prostyle and recessed.
The front of Trinity Church in the new
road, near the Regent's Park, in London
also, presents a mere pseudo-prostyle.
Pulvinated (Lat. puhinus, a cushion or bol-
ster), a term used to express the swelling or
bolstering of the frieze which is found in
some of the inferior works of the Roman
school, and is common in Italian practice.
It is used indifferently with pillowed.
Pycnostyle (Gr. sruxvoc, dense, and trruMs a
column), columns thickly set. Tlie space
or intercolumniation assigned to this term
is one diameter and a half. (See Eustvle.)
QuATRE-FOiL, traccry in four foliations or fea-
therings ; but applicable only to circular or
square panels, and not to arches.
Quoin (Lat. ancon, an elbow or corner, whence
the Fr. coin), a corner-stone. The stones
which are made to project from the regular
surface of the walls at the angles of a build-
ing are technically called quoins. The
front of the Farnese Palace exemplifies
them.
Regula (Lat.), a rule or square. The short
fillet or rectangular block, under the tamia,
on the architrave of the Doric entablature,
is so called.
t Rose or Catherine-wheel Window, the
large circular window filled with various
traccry, which is common in the upper part
of transept fronts in churches and cathe-
drals.
Scotia (Gr. o-»it/i, shadow or darkness), a
concave moulding, most commonly used in
bases, which projects a deeper shadow on
itself than any other form would possess in
an underview position. It is like a reversed
ovale, or rather what the mould of an ovale
would present.
Scroll, synonymous with volute. The term
scroll is commonly applied to the more or-
dinary purposes, while volute is generally
restricted to the scrolls of the Ionic capital.
Section, a drawing showing the internal
heights of the various parts of a building.
It supposes it to be cut through entirely, so
as to exhibit the walls, the heights of the
internal doors, and other apertures ; the
heights of the stories, thicknesses of the
floors, &e. It is one of the species of draw-
ings necessary to the exhibition of a De-
sign, }. V,
Shaft. The body or tapering cylindrical mass
of a column, from the base below to the eapi.
tal above, is so called.
Sill or Sole (Lat. Solum, a threshold, whence
the Fr. scuil). The horizontal base of a
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS.
door 01' window. frame ia called its sill,
though in practice a technical distinction is
made between the inner or wooden base of
the window. frame and the stone base on
which it rests, the latter being called the sill
of the window, and the former that of its
frame. Tliis term is not restricted to the
bases of apertures ; the lower horizontal
part of a framed partition is called its sill.
It is often incorrectly written cill.
Soffit (Ital. soffitta, a ceiling), the inverted
horizontal face of anything. The horizon-
tal face of an entablature resting on, and
lying open between, the columns, is its soffit.
The underface of an arch, where its thick-
ness is seen, is its soffit.
Spandrel. The unoccupied angles, or rather
the excluded triangles of a square, described
about a circle, are called spandrels ; whence
almost any triangular space is designated
by the same term.
t Spire, the tapering mass which forms the
summit of a steeple.
Steeple. This term is used in contradistinc-
tion to tower, the latter being upright, or
nearly so, and terminating abiiost abruptly,
or with pinnacles, and the steeple running
to a point with sides converging from the
base upwards, or from a certain height
only.
Stele (Gr. a-ruM, a cippus or small monu-
ment). The ornaments on the ridge of a
Greek temple, answering to the antefixte on
the summit of the flank entablatures, are
thus designated.
Stereobate (Gr. o-TsgHt, firm, or solid, and
fina-i!, a base or fulciment), a basement. It is
sought to make a distinction between this
term and Stylobate, (j. v., by restricting the
latter to its real import, and applying stereo-
bate toabasement in the absence of columns.
Stoa (Gr. 5-ToK, a portico.) This is the Greek
equivalent for the Latin portions and the
Italo-English portico, q. v.
String or String-course, a narrow, vertical-
faced, and slightly projecting course in an
elevation. If window-sills are made con-
tinuous, they form a string-course ; but if
this course is made thicker or deeper than
ordinary window-sills, it becomes a block-
ing-course.
Style (Gr. o-ti/>iOc, a column). Tlie term stjde
is of very constant use in the composition of
architectural names and distinctions, and in
those compositions it is not to be understood
jn its ordinary and almost unlimited appli-
cation, but in its simple and original mean-
ing,— a column. It is, however, not used in
■ that sense unless in composition ; but in its
ordinary acceptation it is applied to the va-
rieties of architecture, as the Greek and
Roman styles, &,c.
Stvlobate (Gr. o-tums, a column, and ^itk-, a
base or fulciment), a basement to columns.
(See Stereobate.) Stylobate is synonymous
with pedestal, but is applied to a continued
and unbroken substructure or basement to
columns, while the latter term is confined to
insulated supports.
SuRBASE (Lat. super, whence the Fr. sur, above
or upon, and base, q. v.), an upper base. This
term is applied to what, in the fittings of a
room, is familiarly called the chair-rail. It
is also used to designate the cornice of a
pedestal or stereobate, and is separated from
the base by the dado or die.
SisTYLE (Gr. cruv, together with, and a-TvKcc, a
column), columns rather thickly set. An
intereolumniation to which two diameters
are assigned. See Eustyle.
t Tabernacle, a canopied recess or niche.
The rich ornamental tracery forming the
canopy, &c. to a tabernacle, is called taber.
nacle-work : it is common in the stalls and
screens of cathedrals, and in them is gene-
rally open or pierced through.
t Tablet. Projecting mouldings, or moulded
strings in the Pointed style, are better de-
scribed as tablets than as cornices.
T.ENiA (Lat.) aband. (See Band.)
Terminal. Figures of which the upper
parts only, or perhaps the head and shoul-
ders alone, are carved, the rest running into
a diminishing pedestal, with feet indicated
below, or even without them, arc called ter-
minal figures.
Tetrastoon (Gr. T-eTgct, four, and o-toa, a porti-
co). An atrium or rectangular court-yard,
having a colonnade or projected orthostyle
on every side, is called a tetrastoon.
Tetrastvle (Gr.TtTg», four and c-ruMt, a co-
lumn), a portico of four columns in front.
Tholobate (Gr. 6oxoc, a dome or cupola, and
/S«cr;c, a basis or substructure), that on which
a dome or cupola rests. This is a term not
in general use, but not the less of useful
application. What is generally termed the
attic above the peristyle and under the cu-
pola of St. Paul's, would be correctly desig-
nated the tholobate. A tholobate of a dif-
ARCHITECTURAL TERMS,
79
ferent description, and one to which no
other name can well be applied, is the cir-
cular substructure to the cupola of the Lon-
don University.
Tholus or Tholos (Gr.) a dome or cupola,
or any round edifice. This is the only term
used by Greek writers that can be supposed
to apply to the conical chambers which ap-
proach, in internal form, to that of the mo-
dern cupola or dome, and is therefore made
the Greek equivalent for those terms.
Torus (Lat.), a protuberance or swelling, a
moulding whose form is convex, and gene-
rally nearly approaches a semicircle. It
is most frequently used in bases, and is for
the most part the lowest moulding in a base.
TowEa, a circular, square, or polygonal struc-
ture, with upright or slightly converging
sides, running to a height equal to or greater
than its diameter or base, and terminating
abruptly or in horizontal lines. A tower
may be flanked by buttresses whose pinna-
cles surmount it, and be superimposed by a
turret, lantern, or spire.
t Tracery. The transoms, mullions, and in-
terlaced or flowing continuations of the lat.
ter, with their foliations in windows, on
doors, panels, and in tabernacle-work, are
so called. The ribs on groined ceilings,
and almost all eccentric moulded enrich-
ments, come under the same denomination.
Tbachelium (Gr. Tfi;(^»xoc, the neck). In Do-
ric and Ionic columns there is generally a
short space intervening the hypotrachelium
and the mass of the capital, which may be
called the trachelium or neck.
Transom, the horizontal bar used to divide a
muUioned window into heights ; the straight
and horizontal parts of tracery.
t Trefoil, tracery in three foliations or
featherings.
Triglyph (Gr. tjs/c, three, and y\u<pi,, an inci-
sion or channel). The vertically chanelled
tablets of the Doric frieze are called tri.
glyphs, because of the three angular chan-
nels in them, two perfect and one divided ;
the two chamfered angles or hemiglyphs
being reckoned as one. The square sunk
spaces between the triglyphs on a frieze are
called metopes.
+ Turret, a small tower, or a tower of small
base in proportion to its height. Turrets
are sometimes placed on the angles of
towers ; but in the later works of the style
they are attached to the angles of structures
instead of buttresses, and they run up above
their height in lieu of pinnacles.
Tympanum, the triangular recessed space in.
closed by the cornice which bounds a pedi-
ment. The Greeks sometunes placed sculp,
tures representing subjects in connection
with the purposes of the edifice, in the tym-
pana of temples.
Vault, an arched ceiling or roof A vault is,
indeed, a laterally conjoined series of arches.
The arch of a bridge is, strictly speaking, a
vault. Intersecting vaults are said to be
groined. (See Groining.)
Volute (Lat. volutum, a volvo, rolling up or
over, convolving.) The convolved or spiral
ornament which forms the characteristic of
the Ionic capital is so called. The common
English term is scroll, q.v. Volute, scroll,
helix, and cauliculus, are used indifferently
for the angular horns of the Corinthian
capital.
ZooPHORUs (Gr. fabv, an animal, and^s^ato
bear.) This term is used in the same sense
as frieze, and is so called because that part
of the entablature is made the receptacle of
sculptures which arc frequently composed of
various animals.
A MODERN FRONT DOOR.
Plate 1.
This design is new, and in many instances may advan-
tageously be applied. It being original, and differing
materially from any at present executed, it may by many
be thought not practical, and (as is often the case) pre-
ference given to worn-out designs, instead of new. But
prejudices of this kind are fast passing away, and proprie-
tors of buildings are becoming more liberal in sentiment,
submitting matters of design and details to those more
scienced in the art of design and architecture generally.
Such being the case, a belief is entertained that the design
before you will find its admirers.
Fig. 1. The plan representing all parts of the elevation
standing thereon : a plinth of architrave, see a on elevation.
Fig. 2 ; b return of plinth to doorsill c, (see corresponding
letters on elevation ;) c doorsill ; d brick wall ; e plan of archi-
trave, (the architrave may be executed of stone or wood,
as may be seen in the enlarged drawing, Plate 3 ;) /"recess
jamb-piece which passes the same overhead, and forms the
soffit of said recess; g connected with / is a sort of back-
ing to the architrave g ; k enriched bead ; h door-jamb ; i
inside architrave ; j door. If the doorsill is of stone, it
should not extend from c toj, but stop within half an inch
of the door, in order to admit a good securing through the
front of the iron saddle to the floor, as well as to avoid the
necessity of a broad saddle.
Fig. 2. Elevation : a plinth to architrave as in plan ;
c stone sill ; d brick wall ; e architrave ; f enriched bead.
The upper pannels are designed to be finished with maho-
gany sash and plate glass.
li. I
^'^%
U=
/■>,/ 1
JiJi
AN ANT^ FRONT DOOR.
Plate 2.
In this is claimed the construction of the inner antte, and
the finish of the door, side-hghts, transom-hght, and transom
mouldings, with said antce, as original. The whole construc-
tion and relative connection of all the parts will be seen by-
referring to the sectional drawings to a large scale, Plates
3 and 4.
Fig. 1. The plan representing all parts associated with
the elevation referred to, and lettered thus : a plinth ; b re-
turn of plinth to doorsill ; c doorsill, (see corresponding let-
ters on elevation,) d brick wall ; /recess jamb ; g a narrow
architrave or facia, which is formed of the same width over-
head ; /* a jamb extending from g to n — this jamb is con-
nected with a soffit or head-piece of the same width ; i i
pannels under side-lights ; j front of inner antsB ; k door-
jamb and return, or flank of antse ; I inside antge ; m return
or flank of antse, which likewise forms a jamb to side-light ;
n inside architrave ; o outside line of the door ; p inside of
door ; q line of wall finish ; s plan of architrave.
Fig. 2. Elevation : a plinth to anta, (see corresponding
letters on plan ;) c doorsill ; g front of inner anta ; i pannel
or back under side-light ; j elevation of the outside antae.
84
PL. 2.
li'ji t jN'f.ii ffjij f ji: i».K Ejiiiif .if r.'ir f.a p.i skh
laffi
rang
Wv
-n
R?*r
' Fv
r
-"L
Ft,, 1
iT"
lay.
DETAILS.
Plate 3.
This is a section to an enlarged scale, showing the form
and connection of the parts under the side-lights of design,
Plate 2: a is the return plinth from the plinth 5, under fhe
side-light inside ; b (dotted line) plinth of anta between the
door and side-light. The antse between the door and side-
lights, stand in advance of the door, (as may be seen at h in
Plate 4.) This projection is to accommodate the projection
of the transom and its mouldings, as represented by the let-
ters/and pp, Plate 4; c (dotted line) represents the plinth
of outside anta between the door and side- light; d face of
inside anta ; e face of outside anta between door and side-
light ; f front of architrave, or facia, which passes up both
sides and overhead, as c and s, Plate 4 ; g inner extremity
of the architrave, which forms the finish of the door, (refer
to i and g, Plate 4, for further particulars ;) h h pannel
under side-light ; i i bottom rail to back or pannel ; j j top
rail to pannel under side-light ; k k facia to capital ; 1 1 ovolo
of capital ; m bottom rail and style of side-hght sash ; n re-
presents the inside shutter. It will be observed that the
shutter projects over the pannel, or back under the side-
light, which is only done to reduce the whole width of the
work ; o represents the return jamb of the architrave from
g to h ; p return jamb of outside architrave ; r return plinth
from under side-light to front anta ; s plinth under pannel ;
t plinth under outside pannel or back ; u part of the recess
jamb that finishes between the architrave and stone anta,
(see a and b, Plate 4.)
86
F/.3
[ I
v-
J
DETAILS.
Plate 4.
Is a section of the stone, brick, and wood work through
the head of design, Plate 2 : a size of the stone or outside
anta ; J jamb that finishes between the anta and architrave •
c and s ; c return or jamb of architrave ; d return side of
anta; e front of transom. The dotted hne e is that part of
the transom which projects over the side-hght further than it
does over the door ; / transom over the door. Here it may be
well to say that the transom is the width of e wider over the
side-light than over the door ; g represents a portion of the
door ; h that part of the anta which stands in front of the
door sufficient to receive the transom. The transom pro-
jects over the door on the inside about § of an inch ; i the
return or jamb of the architrave g ; j j represents the top
and bottom rails of the transom sash over the side-light ; k k
top and bottom rails of transom over the door ; I head-piece
(equal to the abacus and ovolo or echinus of the capital) in
which to fix the transom sash ; m m (dotted line) shows the
same piece over the transom of the side-light: n style of the
side transom sash ; o side style of transom sash over the
door; pipf ovolos on transom over door and side-light; q
architrave that forms the finish on the side wall, as shown
on the plan, Plate 2 ; r head-piece, or soffit, which passes
over all the parts directly connected with the side-lights
and door. This soffit is tongued, grooved, and glued to s
and q, and should be finished and fitted to the jamb on the
back in order to make a first rate job ; s outside architrave
or facia, which finishes on both sides and above ; t soffit or
head-piece; u furring joist ; w lath and plaster ; .r.rpartof
/'/ .4
89
two beams ; y wooden lintel to support the brick over the
aperture ; z brick-work ; 1 stone blocking over the cornice
of the door-way ; 2 cornice ; 3 bed mould; 4 frieze ; 5 tenia,
or upper fillet to the architrave moulding ; 6 fillet, or regula ;
7 drops, or guttae ; 8 face of architrave ; 9 capital of anta ;
10 front line of brick.
DETAILS.
Plate 5.
This plate represents one half of the head and architrave
of design Plate 1, on an enlarged scale, which will enable
the student to comprehend the subject without the least
difficulty.
Fig. 1, is the half head, and lettered as follows : A and B the
head and side architrave as at g in Fig. 1, Plate 1; de
face of architrave as at e in Fig. 1, Plate 1 ; f relieved
ovolo ; g corona. Fig. 2 is a plan of the architrave d e
in Fig. 1 : a facia as at d in Fig. 1 ; d return or flank of
architrave ; b the outer margin of architrave. See e in
Fig. 1 ; G backing-piece -,600 plinth to architrave. See a
b in Fig. 1, Plate 1.
The two different scales are for the two different figures,
and will give their correct dimensions when taken by a
divider.
oe
PL 5
Scale lofli^ /.
F,y i
"LT
« s Inches
Scale Fpf- Iiy S. .
PARLOR WINDOW.
Plate G.
Presents an original design for a parlor-window finish ;
in w^hicli it will be seen that a bead is executed on the archi-
trave, receding abont J of an inch, which appears well ; but
I am, at the present time, executing the design without the
bead, and give it a decided preference. It appears more
chaste, and is attended willi less labour in its execution.
Fig. 1. Elevation. Fig. 2, scale to Fig. 1. Fig. 3, plan
of architrave, plinth, and shutters : a jamb flap ; b back flap ;
c bade lining ; dd d plinth, this plinth is continued under
the elbows and back. Fig. 4, scale of feet to Fig. 3.
The jamb shutter is in one entire pannel when executed
with ornaments at bottom, top, and middle of pannel, which
is the case in those I am now executing.
fL£.
a b
c
d
U
%j
I—,
1
d
d
1
SLIDING DOORS
Plate 7.
This plate presents an original design for sliding doors,
and, if executed in every particular suggested, would eclipse
every tiling uf the kind yet introduced.
The two middle doors are. designed to slide into the two
wall doors, which are hung to the wall ; and when slid in
the wall door, thsy are together turned around to the wall.
In order that the wall door shall not sag, a way is let into
the floor, as shown in Plate S. To the outer and lower ex-
tremity of the wall doors is fixed a sheave crosswise of the
door, which will act upon the circular way-piece. And in
order that the middle door niav slide into the wall or hung
door, tlie lloor is § of an inch lower under that than any
other part of the floor, which will admit of a way being
secured at the bottom for the convenience of the middle
sliding doors. The circular ways as shown on the ])lan in
Plate S.
The doors are designed to be executed with plate glass
in tiie upper pannels, which would present a very striking
effect.
Th'j details of this plate and design follow in Plates 8, 9,
lU, and 1 I. Plate 9 is an entablature on an enlarged scale.
Plate 10 is a plan and section of the ceibng over the plan
Plate 8. Plate 11 is the base column and capital on an en-
larged scale, atlapted to practical jiurposcs. Tlic above, if
executed in a manner due to tiie design, m iU in etfect rarely
be e.fceiled.
PL.7.
r
^
3
:
^
r
^
:
1
;!
1
:
1
i
•li
r
j-^
Ja
SLIDING DOORS
Plate
This plate represents a plan of the design in Plate 7, and
explained in the explanation of that plate. Nothing can
surpass the beauty and effect of this design when correctly
executed in conformity to it. If at first the execution may
be thought impracticable, it will, on a correct and careful
examination, be found quite otherwise.
te
PL. 8.
■w
Jr^
DESIGN FOR AN ENTABLATURE.
Plate 9.
This plate is a design for the entablature of Plate 7, on
an enlarged scale, for practical purposes.
98
I'1.9.
/^n„vr^,,v
f I-. \/
w
DESIGN FOR A CEILING.
Plate 10.
Is a plan and section of ceiling over the sliding door ;
plan in Plate 8. Fig. 1, plan of the ceiling over sliding door :
a is a way fixed to the beam, (see b in Fig. 2.) Fig. 2, sec-
tion of Fig. 1 ; c is the upper end of sliding doors.
lOU
rue.
f«mnunn
Fi^- /
lOl
Fn--
DESIGN FOR A CAPITAL.
Plate 11.
This is a design composed of antique specimens, and re-
duced to accurate proportions ; with a view to render it
acceptable in many places, instead of the standard orders.
For the entablature see Plate 12. In many situations this
design will be preferable to those generally in use.
lOS
7v. y/.
5^
^ft
»
<r,'i
''i
-iPfr
L_«i_=^
p
n
1
i
1
n
J ic 2fi SO 4lf .>V
- u
)
1
t
J
^ . ^
v_
)
it's
Enf' i^ XgMrin If-T
ENTABLATURE.
Plate 12.
Entablature to Plate 11. When this entablature is
executed with a pediment, the effect would be improved on
the sides or flanks by discontinuing' the cymatium at a the
centre of the first tile ornament. It is not intended that the
tile ornaments should be executed, if the cymatium be re-
turned or continued on the sides or flanks : h is the front of
the water gutter, which stands behind the tile ornaments
when executed.
/v. /2
..-
s
1. ■•.•.■•.
S7)i
fli
3i>V,
2»
m^ ,— ..' .::
1
,
S
&*
Z8
se
1
S
•■i
ss
S
J
St
s
3SH
.
/
S8
J-t
ts
14
t8
1*
DESIGN FOR SLIDING DOORS
Plate 13.
This plate represents the entire elevation of the partition
separating the front and back parlours. In this elevation
are designs of sliding or folding doors, pannels in the side-
piers, cornice and frieze in the angle, formed by the ceiling
and side vv^alls. The vi^hole elevation is new in design, and
in many instances may be preferred to the antse or column
finish. In designing for interior finishings, and particularly
parlours, the architect has much to perform if he wishes to
excel, or even compare with, those of his profession. In this
elevation, the sliding door design presents original fixtures,
and by unprejudiced minds they will be favourably received,
and in appropriate instances supersede the use of those
which have been in use so long, and consequently become
common and not so desirable as when first introduced.
»»;
P/.I3
lens:
(!■ e & e © (i e t 0
D
© © © ® © €5 © © ®
(fell
t„
, i
®
©I
ri:|
©I
es
©I
e;
©
©
©
■r
PARLOUR ELEVATION.
Plate 14.
In tliis is represented an entire elevation of the side of
the parlours next the hall or entrance from the front door.
This elevation is connected with Plate 13. The doors are
trimmed in the architrave style, and executed next the door
without a bead. The door recedes from the face of the ar-
clxitraves, in order to relieve them from the face of the door.
108
Fl. ]4.
®
©
©
© 1^
© j
i
®
©
©
e
WINDOW DESIGN,
Plate 15.
In designing for parlour finishing, the most difficult task is
to produce a desired effect, with due proportions of enrich-
ments. In this, although considerably ornamental, yet in
no respect has it an appearance of over-rated or superfluous
labour. The capitals of the antse are of an original charac-
ter, and will equal any thing of a similar application yet in
use. The capitals, or caps, are continued across the head
of the window, under which the shutters will stand, when
closed before the window ; and the cap will project over
them the same as it does over the face of the antse and shut-
ters when they are shut into the box, and at the same time
forms the return sides or jambs of the antse, as will be seen
in the section. By this design it will be easy for the stu-
dent to discover the important effect produced by the depth
on the return of the antce, which, prior to the present time,
did not exceed one and a half inches in thickness, which
certainly presented a very indifferent effect. The follow-
ing are the lettered references to all the various parts : Fig. 1
is an entire elevation of a window with a part of the en-
tablature directly over it. Fig. 2 is a section of Fig. 1,
showing all the parts employed in the finish and execution
of the design : a in Fig. 1 is a portion of the entablature ;
a in Fig. 2 is the piazza floor; h stone sill, this sill forms a
common step from the floor c of window sill ; d bottom
rail of sash ; e base to antse and room, this base is six inches
high ; ythe thickness of antee to the shutter-box ; g shutter,
this shutter is in one entire piece, the back flap is executed
110
Ftgl.
JUUUULLUUUUUUUUULiUL,UUUUUUUUUUU(
.\,\ ,^..^.^^ \^j,xMa.vxAj->AJo ^ ^ ^ \ » « »};t
Mi!iibi^ij;jnMi'iCTi"n''rgjii an°;E'K'i!'Tr'iT'''i°'"i"'i°j'w,ygfeiii!ja
:$AMIlli^lOf^»^I^'^^^:
Fxy.i.
1 i r f
Ill
in two parts as usual ; h return of brick-work to the hang-
ing style ; i meeting rail of sash ; j marble or stone lintel ;
Hi section of that part of the antee cap that jiasses over the
window ; I return of antfe cap ; m section of the architrave
of the entablature ; n frieze of entablature ; o bed mould-
ings and dentals ; p soffit of cornice ; q corona ; r crown
moulding of a relieved ovolo ; s lath and plaster of the ceil-
ing ; t floor of second story ; u lath and plaster of the second
side wall ; v v sections of two beams ; 7V cross bridgings ;
X deafening boards ; y strips nailed on the sides of the beams,
to support the deafening board ; a; r is a section of a 4 x i j
piece of hard wood running the whole extent of the wall or
partition; 1 pocket-piece that raises up with the lowermost
sash into the groove ; 2 the second story stud ; 3 the first story
stud, this stud or post disappears behind the window finish ;
4 cross furring to form the window soffit ; 5 wooden lintel,
over which a brick arch is turned to take the wall from the mar-
ble or stone lintel, ^ ; 6 wooden lintel, over which is a brick
arch to take the weight of the wall, and to form a recess
for the pocket or groove to receive the sash when raised to
admit a passage from the parlour to the piazza ; 7 brick
wall ; 8 blank space ; 9 pocket on the head of the window-
frame to receive the lower sash. In the soffit or head-piece
of the window there will be executed a pocket-piece the
thickness of the sash, which will have a short tenon on each
end, and which are to slide up in grooves prepared for the
purpose ; when the sash comes in contact with it, or is
lowered down, it will follow it until it descends to its proper
place; 10 bracket for lathing to; 11 top rail to sash; 12
section of head-piece to hanging style ; 13 hanging style.
ANT7E BASE AND CAPITAL.
Plate 16.
The antse base and capital here represented, are designed
at a half-size scale, intended as a working drawing for Plate
15. The base in this design is much lower than the usual
height of parlour bases, which may by some be condemned;
but after wisely examining the matter, it will be acknow-
ledged that no architectural reasons can be assigned for its
being any liigher, but both utility and effect must be con-
ceded, in an architectural point of view, in favour of the pro-
portions here represented ; a in the antse capital represents
a section of the moulding.
PL 16
i.>*<<,i
^y\^
I] y^—--'(^j.
*->
OMi::i^OM[iii::ii::ior.
Fig.i.
y
~y"
\
5 H ' '»
n
DETAILS,
Plate 17.
In this })late are illustrated all the particulars necessary
to render the execution of the window design, Plate 15,
intelligible to the understanding of every workman.
The parts that are most difficult to comprehend in
Architecture, can no way be attained to, as readily as
by plans and sectional drawings, which in this plate are
fully set forth and explained. It contains a plan of the
brick wall, window frame, inside shutters, shutter box, and
a part of the inside architrave, and also a section of the
stone sill, wooden sill, the different parts in the window
frame, and an elevation and section of the base and anta.
The following are the references to the different figures and
letters : Fig. 1 represents a plan of the brick wall, window
frame, shutters, box, and architrave: a a brick wall; h
hanging style ; c outside lining, and outside stop bead; d
pulley style ; e back lining to window frame ; g inside lining ;
V inside stop bead ; x inside and bottom sash ; f parting
bead; w groove for uppermost and outside sash ; tf' box for
sash weights. The following are the letters for the parts
employed in the shutters, simtter box, &c. : y bed for the
shutter when closed on the window ; z z z projection of the
fillet of the base, (see u u in Fig. 2 ;)y style of jamb shutter ;
t sunk pannel of shutter ; k bead and butt pannel ; 7n style
of jamb shutter ; n style of ilap shutter ; o bead and butt
pannel of flap shutter ; p outside style of flap shutter ; r sunk
pannel; 5 5 style of back liring;y pannel of back lining :
V inside architrave. The piece on the back of the archi-
ng. I.
PL./?.
V
K
\A
\r\ \ J
^WMH
/■y,/ i
:o^ ^^<>:
115
trave, near the No. 22, is glued or otherwise fitted to the
architrave, to give it a sufficient projection from the wall,
against which this piece lies ; and is represented by the
short line extending on to Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 : a brick jamb, (see a in Fig. I ;) h hanging style ;
(see b Fig. 1 ;) c outside stop bead, (see c Fig. I ;) d groove
for outside sash, (see w Fig. 1 ]) e parting bead, (see/" Fig.
1 ;)/ inside sash, (see x Fig. 1 ;) g inside stop bead, (see v
in Fig. 1 ;) 0 thickness of jamb shutter when closed on the
window, (see y Fig. \ ;) p p inside shutter, and likewise
serves as a side or flank to the anta. The p on the extre-
mity of the return of the anta represents the side of the
anta when the shutters are folded over the window ; r repre-
sents the elevation of the base ; w the section of the base ;
u u the projection of the fillet of the base past the anta
and shutter, both when in the anta, and when closed over
the window ; s represents the plinth under the base mould-
ings ; w floor line ; m the height of stone sill and thickness
of piazza floor,/ under the sill is the tliickness of the piazza
floor, and in front represents the front thickness of sill ;
h is the difference between the height of the „ parlour and
piazza floors ; / underside of piazza floor ; i section of stone
sill.
DETAILS.
Plate 18.
The details described, are drawn to an enlarged scale for
the pannels in Plate 15, but will be applicable in various
situations. The designs are original, and designed and
drawn by C. L. Bell, Architect.
n. /d
■pieJ.Iiy C.LBtll
PARLOR DOOR.
Plate 19.
This design is original and appropriate fur parlours of the
first class. The composition is novel and judiciously
arranged, and in no instance where elegance is required
would it fail to produce a chaste and elegant effect.
Tiie workmen in making preparations, and through the
whole execution of this design, must pay particular atten-
tion to the neatness and perfection of all the parts engaged,
in order to render it more perfect.
The plan of the door jamb is moulded with a neat ogee
moulding, which will present it more chaste and acceptable
to classic observers. In order to make it useful in practice,
it is thought necessary to accompany it with the details in
working drawings, which are illustrated at large and explain-
ed in Plate 20.
Note. — The present and former custom of executing high skirtings and bases in
parlours being fixed in the minds of almost every workman as unavoidably necessary,
it rnay be well to remark, (notwithstanding the treatises in favour of such proportions,
that no one branch of finishing more requires a reform from the old school system.
The wTiter is aware of the prejudices against new designs in the architectural i^
partment ; he nevertheless resolves to carry into effect, as far as his abilities will
permit, a change in designs and proportions of interior finishings for private resi-
dences. He would therefore recommend to those concerned, to duly consider all
subjects of the above importance, prior to the execution thereof.
118
yv. j/j
i>^
S^^^A
.......... ^
1
I'v J~-^ si'y i> 2^ ^2/' iyiv ^iy i>3/ Ii':j ^ .-
I
,--^ ii ,
\
i
'
T*^. »t 1.9 »
WORKING DETAILS TO PLATE 19.
Plate 20.
Fig. 1 represents the plans of the studs, lath and plaster,
architrave, door jamb, plinth, and door, which are thus
described, viz. : a a a plinths ; b architrave ; c c mouldings
to door jamb ; d door jamb; e door ;// thickness of lath
and plaster ; g g studs or joists ; h space between studs ; i
backing of architrave ; j j front line of plaster.
Fig. 2, profile of architrave and cornice ; a crown mould-
ing ; h corona ; c soffit, or plancer of cornice ; d bed mould ;
e outer facia of architrave ; ^ inside facia.
Fig. 3, ornament across the door head, (see Plate 19.)
lao
/y. ivy
Fi:./.2.
/'V'/. .?
nz
srjj^ or ixcsjis
a
rf
•t
S
A
.1
/'
F,.,.J .
</
y
'
y
f
f
^
./
-
i
i
1
a
DESIGN FOR A CENTRE FLOWER
Plate 21.
The design presented is original, and appropriate to par-
lours of the first class. It may be varied in size to accom-
modate many situations.
122
/y. iv.
Fi^J
f>^ :
M., r.
1 S C A I, K
ENG BT J.r, K&ItlK, M -Y .
ANTA AND ENTABLATURE
Plate 22.
Is a miniature drawing of an anta and entablature, given
to show the comparative heights and proportions, and to
reduce it to a scale of minutes for operative purposes. The
numbers are figured the same as in the details of Plates 23
and 24. Fig. 1 is the anta and entablature. Fig. 2, an
enriched egg-moulding to an enlarged scale, but does not
belong with the above anta.
m
J^L.'23. .
H H P
Fic,i
5
Si
S-3
•sj-vi
ii'
i
2i .Ji
' 2^
1
..
1
il, JO
l-'H SS'l/i
1
4_~1_rL.~L^'i^^-riJi_r1_"lJ^— ^1— "i-."1_
3
30
II- v^
rra
1
'4.
— »r-^
v\
-
n,/ 1.
J
It
1-
J
1
-1
i.
1
1
,;'/■ *
.IMt
-Tfisl SfJi ' 1
J.
''/ - 'ki.
J
ANTA DETAILS
Plate 23.
The details of this plate are half full size, and reduced to
a scale of minutes, in order to render it intelhgible to the
student; for practice. This anta bears resemblance to the .
anta employed in the Choragic Monument at Athens, yet it
materially differs therefrom in the contours and proportions
of the details. The projections are figured from the centre.
The letter H at the top of the columns represents height,
and P projection.
The base mouldings are well adapted in form and propor-
tion for parlours.
N. B. — The termination of the base, which is a bevel, is
figured one and a half minutes high, but should have been
one half only.
rL.22.
Ji p
-n^
*-./.
■^
Jf-)t
'-/•
»Y«
if '*•/'
H/.
^\a
°1h
iJiVl
ANTA ENTABLATURE DETAILS.
Plate 24.
The architrave guttse, or drops, are formed in two lengths
and projections. The longest guttce,.or drops, may be either
round or square ; but the shortest row will be square, and
project to the centre of the round guttse. The projections
are figured from the centre, as in Plate 23.
128
PL tt^.
u
P
.5
SI
i ^7*
1
4?/»
/
ss
MS
.J/<
I 'A
37
/
a^
1
.5+
,50
7-'A
35-^
-;•. 3b
■i-l 31,u
"i^^^_
1 1 1
■JS.
30
H
SLIDING DOOR DESIGN
Plate 25.
This design is original in its features, and may be classed
with the richest compositions of the present style of finishing.
It may be remarked, with propriety, that many attempts
have been made to introduce appropriate and elegant finish-
ing, that might be executed without connecting it with the
cornice of the room, which in this case is effected, and may
in various situations be preferable to column or anta when
the architrave and frieze are terminated between the wails.
The plan and elevation are shown entire at Figs. 1 and 2.
Fig. 1, elevation; Fig. 2, the plan.
13d
PL. '2b.
F,.,. 1.
T-T-rit^l»ni[BBIKfllllUH!fIl»/rTllimBlIITB»IBl[l»BIlglimiBTriB»iriTZfHfg]rTrilKBWWflll'lBIIMIIlWM«ai«MlllBIII!Tli;] I iTTTTl
mm^.4.^^i.
^e^x^i^K'^'jA'^jit-A'Kr' ■ii'AAA'^-j.-AXJt-j^^-:A^J!>3,':^i^i
^:fi:jijk'fi.:^:fiji.i^ji:fi':fiji.j,j^v./^j,'JiJiJtJiZiijL.i.jfjijt'jj
m^'^mmm^mmm^L
®
®
®
r,;rj
_l ! 1 I L_
DETAILS OF SLIDING DOORS. PL. 25.
Plate 26.
These details are drawn to an enlarged scale, by which
the proportions and forms are distinctly shown, and by
which the v.-orkman may be instructed to execute with
a degree of correctness necessary to produce the required
effect. The drawing, as shown, represents the semi-eleva-
tion of the door-head, connected with a portion of the side
elevation : a represents the centre of the column ; h eleva-
tion of the architrave, (see h h in the design, PL 25 ;) e, the
dotted line, represents the extremity of the column.
n%
Fz.'jt;
I I I I I I I M
DETAILS OF SLIDING DOORS
Plate 27.
In order that the student may be furnished with neces-
sary instructions, which will enable him systematically to
carry these designs into execution, th-e details are, in this
and the two following plates, given on an enlarged scale,
with all the parts figured and referred to in the following
explanations.
Fig. 1 represents the plan with the studdings, base, boxing
for the door, the door in the box, and the columns ; a a Fig. 1,
plan of columns ; h facia back of column, (see a in Fig. 1,
Plate 25 ;) c return or flank of g in Fig. 2 ; d face of
architrave, (see g in elevation, Fig. 2 ;)y margin or band,
(see y in elevation. Fig. ^;) g lath and plaster, and likewise
grounds ; h regulating bead to the door ; i door jamb ; j j j
studs ; k k k spaces between the studs which requires pieces
worked in at about two feet apart for nailing to ; I plan of
door when slid on the box ; m represents the partitions,
door, &c., as broken off within the full extent. Fig. 2, a
broken elevation of the base, architrave, facia between the
architrave and columns, and the column ; a the base, and a
small portion of the column ; b plinth under the architrave ;
c d e base mouldings of the room ; f band or margin of the
architrave ; g facia of the architrave ; o represents the way-
piece.
134
I^l .2
1-7
L'L
. J
_J
1
u
J
_
, 1
M/. :d .
±
f.
,/
c
d
s.
« * e s ic la
-J — I — I — I — I — i — I I I I I
SECTION OVER SLIDING DOORS.
Plate 28.
This section represents all parts employed in cornicing,
furring, and finishing over the doors, and are designated by
the terms, viz. : a a facia of the architrave on vs^hich the or-
naments are applied over the door ; h h soffit over the door ;
c c regulating beads for the doors, (see h in Plate 27 ;) d be-
tween the regulating beads, represents the groove formed for
the door to slide in ; d d on the two extremes represent the
border or margin of the architrave ; e e bed mould ; ff
corona upon which the ornament is executed ; g the centre
ornament ; h h facia or frieze of the cornice around the
room, which is of plaster ; i i bed mould ; j dental, (see
Plates 30 and 31;) k anta, or intermediate dentals, (see
Plates 30 and 31 ;) Z ornamental bead, (see Plates 30 and
31 ;) 7n m corona of stucco cornice in the angle of the ceil-
ing and side wall ; n n crown moulding'; o o ceiling of the
room ; p p p p section of furring ', q q q q studding, or joists.
\ r
ri. 2rS'.
^?~7
7
'/
"^^^
-L. '
DETAILS
Plate 29.
Fig. 1 represents a section of parts of the styles and pan-
nels of the sliding doors on an enlarged scale ; a a a portion
of the two styles ; l b thickest part of the pannels, or that
part which forms the outer margin ; c c the inner recess or
pannel, the entire elevation of which may be seen in the de-
sign, PL 25. Fig. 2, a parlour base on an enlarged scale :
b represents a furring piece behind the plinth ; a represents
the wall line.
7"/.^^.
:^-^
: J
/^
J'kI 2
T^n, /
EXTERIOR EAVE CORNICE.
Plate 30.
This design consists of bold and prominent members, dis-
posed of in a manner that will not fail to produce an imi^osing
effect in any situation. It has proportions adapted to a three-
story house ; consequently, if required higher or lower, a
variation accordingly will be required : a represents the
frieze ; h a piece put on the back of the frieze, to make the
projection about two inches from the face of the brick wall ;
c should have set back of h, and represented the brick wall.
By the projectioiTS over the head of the plate, it will be seen
that the whole projects eighteen inches from the face of the
brick wall, and sixteen inches from the face of the frieze.
m
F/.30
V,'-^"-.X \ k
"^
to
IONIC ORDER
Plate 31.
This example has neither the proportions nor general fea-
tures of the antique Ionic order, nor is it pretended that it is
in general equal to it ; but it is hoped that it may not be
wholly inferior. The general proportions are as below
described, viz. :
The whole height of the column, base, and capital, is eight
diameters ; and the whole height of the entablature is three
diameters and five minutes ; and the whole entire height of
the order, including base, shaft, capital, frieze, and cornice, is
eleven diameters and five and a half minutes. For the pro-
portions of the capital, see Plate 32, which is designed for a
working drawing.
IJ-3
rL.il
/■ //
f^ -^ ~j^r -rfz s^<
I'M
til!
.lLU. • ' : L
P
_L
±
DETAILS OF IONIC CAPITAL.
Plate 32.
This capital is not of any particular specimen of antique
productions, but partakes of several, as well as of fancy.
The composition is a departure from the strict, perfect, and
arbitrary rules of design. Notwithstanding, it will be admit-
ted that it, as a modern combination of parts, presents rather
a pleasing effect.
Fig. 1 presents the abacus, volute, echinus, bead, the suc-
cle and lotus, necking ornament, and the heads of flutes
which are banded, or headed with an astragle, as at b. Fig. 2,
section of capital, Fig. 1. The quarter circle on the left
of the plate, and represented by the small letter a, is a rule
by which the spiral beads that revolve round the eye are pro-
portioned, and is performed thus : Take the whole dimen-
sions of the beads that are horizontal, under the abacus, and
describe a quarter circle ; which circle divide into sixteen
parts, and each part on the right line will give a correct dimi-
nish for each quarter, as it revolves around the eye. The
revolutions of the spirals are produced as follows : Divide the
eye, which is seven minutes from out to out of the hem, and
six and a half minutes within the hem of said eye, into the
number of parts shown in the eye ; then take the distances
fieured on the right lines, which are the number of minutes
required, and revolve the dividers ; the quarters, as described
by the dotted lines.
The method of describing this volute, was invented and
reduced to practice by Mr. James H. Daken, whose talents,
taste, and ideas, are of the first order, and by the v.'nter held
in very high estimation.
144
F/. ,32
IONIC DETAILS.
Plate 33.
These details are introduced in order to give the operative
workman a general view of the construction of this simple
and beautiful capital. The details here given are precisely
the same as they were in the original temple. The elevation
of the volute, as represented by Fig. 2, is figured in feet and
inches, as taken on the spot at the temple by Messrs. Stuart
and Revett. Fig. 1 represents a general plan of the angular
capital, and is figured by the scale of minutes, as at Plate 32.
Fig. 5 represents a section of the flank. Fig. 4, a section
through the volute, the same as Fig. 2 in Plate 32, and is not
iigured. Fig. 3 represents an elevation of the flank, the pro-
jections of which are figured on the under side of Fig. 5.
^/. ,'JS.
FROM THE ERECTHEION TEMPLE.
Plate 34.
Fig. 1, plan of the angular capital. Fig. 2, side elevation,
or profile of the capital. Fig. 3, section of capital. Fig. 4,
elevation of antse capital.
us
*','/'■'
hi I]. I.
t 1
I f 1 i
^^^^^^^^^
/VJ
/?,//
:;-:>;^)ji9iwi»;^^'
;3W
■ 'I
FROM THE ERECTHEION TEMPLE.
Plate 35.
This plate represents the front and side elevation of a
cargatides. Fig. 1, side or profile view. Fig. 2, front eleva-
tion. For the peculiar character, refer to the historical
description.
DETAILS OF CARVATICaE PANDROSEION.
TZ./;.?.
nj.i.
Kg. 2 .
%www
^mma
FROM THE ERECHTHEION.
THE PARTHENON AT ATHENS
Plate 36.
The elevation exhibited in this example is simple, beauti-
ful, rich, and unquestionably the most perfect of any bu.ilding
of antiquity. The reader, for an historical view, will refer
as in the preceding plate.
J'LiO
o
>
>
O
c
n
GREEK TEMPLE S.
Plate 37.
The plans here introduced are, for the purpose of stimu-
lating the rising generation to a correct taste, of severe and
perfect elegance of architecture. The different plans are to
distinsruish the different names originating out of the differ-
ent number of columns employed. For particulars refer to
definitions of terms.
GRIE'CIAIT AJRiL'HttTECTlUMIE.
F1..37.
Jll -ln/lj K- I'wsll/li.r
J^en^tems.
■ O.T D
u
a I o '
p'.XSS.
o i ^
b o o. i D ^o
o
o
J
J
_;
'J
O
o
J/yparhros
oooooooooo
oooooooooo
oooooooooo
0 0
o o
0 0
a 0
1 O O O O
TOO
O o
0 0
o o
^
0
0
0
u
o o
o o
0
0
Q
o
0 0
0 0
O 0
0 0
0
0
0
u
o o
O 0
0 o
: -
o
o o
0 o
O 0
5
0
'
0 o
L. 0 0 o
J
O O
0 0
O O
O 0
o o L
0 0
O 0 o o L
O u
O 0
OOOOOOOOOO
oooooooooo
0 O O Cj o O o o n r,
Amphtprestyles
JJifiUroj- kJ'seudt^Jiptms
F
'-> O J ;;. 0 J
o
0
0 0 o . „ .
J
o
^
~|] J o
^
u
0
o
o
u
0
0
0
0
o
u
1 1
-1
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
^
J
0
o
o
o
0
o
'J
^
0
o
o
\J
0
0
p ^
u
o
o
o
^
J
o
0
0
0 -L
o o L
o
o
0
0
0
o o o o o o
0
L
^ iJ O ^ _i '_)
o
1
irnMriPiEiiis
THE PARTHENON AT ATHENS.
Plate 38.
Fig. 1, a perspective view. Fig. 2, a front geometrical
view. Fig. 3, a longitudinal or side view.
]S6
FL.iH.
Fid.l.
H^.^
ail III III! illl liil [111 liil hi ii ' I I — ]_f [■•
Fi j. :i.
1 ^ Q-/'> -ht. n n ri_r:\ r\ ri__a_ri_'n j^_h-Ji-Ji
Fft?
IONIC DETAILS.
Plate 39.
The details here presented are from the temple of Minerva
Polias, which constitute one of the porticoes of the Erectheion
temple at Athens.
158
DttaH,^' ct- CafiUal and Basr f>tm rhf Tfmple it mn^fva Mus
I'imtitl CI' iVtutiili FteUi rii^ A'/f.'/if/ii
-JML
.^^
IONIC DE TAILS.
Plate 40.
Fig. 1, entablature to the preceding Plate 39. Fig. 2, base,
as in Plate 39. Fig. 3, antee base to Fig. 4 in Plate 34.
Fig. 4, architrave moulding to an enlarged scale. Fig. 5,
bed moulding to an enlarged scale.
J'l. J (J.
/•Va. J.
Jy.3.
Ft,/. 2.
as'i'
_L
",'^,N
*:*
1
«1 [■
"^Hii
*'*opOBOfd23
27 ?A.
i'Si.
GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE.
Plate 41.
This Plate presents a detail drawing of the Doric order,
from the Temple of Minerva, at Athens ; for a description of
which, refer to the History of the Temples. The parts in
height and projections are figured by a scale of minutes.
i
-^ '
DOR c ORDER FROM THE TEMPLE OF MINERVA AT ATHENS,
JPL.41.
"I'
i-y/'i
^-
OR
V,
ijyt
DETAILS OF THE DORIC CAPITAL.
Plate 42.
Fig. 1, plan of column at the neck. Fig. 2, semi-elevation
of the capital. Fig. 3, section of fillets, flute, and groove ;
a depth of the flute. It may be useful to the operative work-
man to remark that the flutes require to be vi'orked up to the
low^ermost fillet entire.
]G4
PL.4,'2.
CORINTHIAN COLUMN AND CAPITAL.
Plate 43.
From the monument of Lysicrates. Fig. 1, column, base,
and capital. Fig. 2, section of capital ; for historical descrip-
tion, refer to the preceding historical extracts.
FL.d'd
11
Y\.%V.
'» ' ^
\ I I
Jt' oV
T
f
v_
ENTABLATURE
Plate 44.
Entablature to Plate 43. This entablature is drawn to the
same scale as 43, and the dimensions are figured from the
centre of the column.
168
U v. H.
»iy ' fv»
PI. -11
74,^ 3ii
71314
«J»
<4p
UV
4'p
tS'/s
tt'li
DETAILS
Plats 45.
In this Plate is exhibited a cornice, which is designed to
explain the method of working the inclined cymatium to mitre
with the level cymatium. Fig. 1 represents the level mould-
ing, and Fig. 2 the inclined moulding. To form Fig. 2, first
draw ordinate lines, as at 1 1, 2 2, and 3 3, in Fig. 1, from
which on the contour of the moulding transfer the distances
1 1, 2 2, 3 3, and so on to 1 1, 2 2, 3 3, in Fig. 2 ; which will,
when traced, produce the cymatium required to mitre with
the level cymatium. Fig. 1.
PL a:
CHIMNEY PIECES
Plate 46.
Fig. 1, a truss chimney-piece, for either wood or marble.
Fig. 2, profile, showing the projections of the different parts.
Fig. 3, plan of the pilaster, jamb, &c. Fig. 4, elevation of an
architrave piece. Fig. 5, profile of Fig. 4. Fig. 6, plan of
Fig. 4.
iva
FiS.2 .
Fifi.l.
fi^.
■rn^MM
n
f
mmmmsmam
D
"^
®
ea^jyaaaasi
Fi^..1 .
Figh.
m
%
m
Fis.4.
J
FigJi
PULPIT
Plate 47.
Fig. 1, plan of Pulpit; Fig. 2, elevation; Fig. 3, caping,
half full size ; Fig. 4, base, half full size.
171
PL. -17.
A
n r
Fie. J,
'-^
Fi^.
Fi^.4.
X
GALLERY FRONT
Plate 48.
Fig. 1 elevation of gallery front, showing all the parts of
the gallery, and one capital of a column. Fig. 2, section of
Fig. 1. Fig. 3, elevation of two pews.
m
Fi-l
.^^^-
P^:
0 u
L' C
l_|, i
u u
Li lJ
a D
->
; C i2j
,;,-
■ '.J'
U L
"
-
Ly "-T
; 1
D D
! CC
1 C D
(CO
M ^'
'11
-
! tc
1 i- c
L D
P
1 u u 1
'-' ^ 1
\ u lJ
m
i U D
Fig.i
I I I I I I I I I . ■
^
^
\
A'JG 1 5 1962